Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 6 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Bloch, Schottky, and the Picard Theorems — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples make the Picard package concrete. The first records the explicit numerical bound produced by the elementary Bloch proof actually written on this page, the next specializes Schottky's theorem at a fixed center value, and the exponential examples show the sharpness of both Picard theorems.

The counterexample and false statements keep the holomorphic and meromorphic versions distinct: on the plane, a nonconstant meromorphic function may omit two sphere values, and Little Picard does not need any extra boundedness hypothesis.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The elementary Bloch proof on this page yields the explicit lower bound 1/48

Example

The proof of Bloch's theorem gives the concrete universal estimate

β(f)148(f(0)=1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic map f:DC with f(0)=1.

[L1]

Bloch's theorem on this page proves β(f)1/48 (Bloch's theorem).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Fact [L1] gives the lower bound β(f)1/48 for every normalized holomorphic disc map.

L1given
2.1

Applying step 1.1 to the present function is exactly the stated example.

step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Schottky's theorem applied to a disc map with center value 1/2

Example

For each 0<r<1 there is a constant Cr>0 such that every holomorphic f:DC{0,1} with f(0)=1/2 satisfies

f(z)Cr(zr).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A radius 0<r<1 and a holomorphic map f:DC{0,1} with f(0)=1/2.

[L1]

Schottky's theorem supplies a bound depending only on the center modulus and the target radius (Schottky's theorem).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L1] with R=1/2. This gives a constant C(1/2,r) depending only on r.

L1given
2.1

The constant from step 1.1 works for the present function, so one may take Cr:=C(1/2,r).

step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The exponential function omits exactly zero and shows little Picard is sharp

Example

The exponential function ez is entire, omits exactly the value 0, and therefore shows that Little Picard's "at most one omitted finite value" is sharp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complex exponential function.

[L2]

Its image is exactly C{0} (The complex exponential maps C onto C{0}).

[L3]

Little Picard allows at most one omitted finite value (Little Picard theorem).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Facts [L1] and [L2] show that ez is a nonconstant entire function whose omitted finite-value set is exactly {0}.

L1L2given
2.1

Fact [L3] says no nonconstant entire function can omit two finite values, while step 1.1 exhibits one omitting exactly one. Therefore the bound in Little Picard is sharp.

L3step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The function e^(1/z) omits zero and takes every nonzero value infinitely often near the origin

Example

The function

f(z):=e1/z

on 0<z<1 omits 0 and takes every nonzero value infinitely often near 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The punctured-disc function f(z)=e1/z.

[L1]

The exponential maps onto C{0} (The complex exponential maps C onto C{0}).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Since the exponential never vanishes, f(z) never equals 0 on the punctured disc.

L1given
1.2

Fix w0. By [L1] and [L2], choose λC with eλ=w; then every number λ+2πik is another logarithm of w. For every integer k with λ+2πik0, set zk:=1/(λ+2πik). At most one integer is excluded, while all the remaining zk satisfy f(zk)=w and zk0 as k. Thus every nonzero value occurs infinitely often near 0.

L1L2givenconstruct
2.1

Therefore Great Picard is sharp: one finite exceptional value can occur, namely 0.

step 1.1step 1.2
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The exponential function omits 0 and infinity as a meromorphic map on the plane

Statement refuted

A nonconstant meromorphic function on C omits at most one sphere value.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exponential function regarded as a meromorphic map ez:CC^.

[L2]

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Fact [L1] makes ez meromorphic on C with no poles, and [L2] identifies its image as C{0}.

L1L2given
2.1

As a sphere-valued map, the omitted values are therefore 0 and . Since ez is nonconstant, this refutes the claim that at most one sphere value can be omitted.

step 1.1
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

FALSE: little Picard needs a boundedness hypothesis

Statement

Little Picard's theorem needs an additional boundedness assumption on the entire function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Little Picard's theorem.

[L1]

A nonconstant entire function omits at most one finite value (Little Picard theorem).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Fact [L1] already states the omitted-value conclusion for every nonconstant entire function, with no boundedness hypothesis.

L1given
2.1

Therefore the asserted extra boundedness assumption is false.

step 1.1
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

FALSE: a nonconstant meromorphic function on the plane omits at most one sphere value

Statement

A nonconstant meromorphic function on C omits at most one value of C^.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The meromorphic exponential counterexample.

[L1]

The exponential meromorphic map on C omits 0 and (The exponential function omits 0 and infinity as a meromorphic map on the plane).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Fact [L1] is already a nonconstant meromorphic function on C omitting two sphere values.

L1given
2.1

Therefore the claim "at most one sphere value" is false.

step 1.1

Sources