Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The polydisc Bergman product and the different distinguished-torus Hardy kernel

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and let m≥1. The Bergman kernel of the polydisc is the product of disc kernels,

KDm(z,w)=∏j<mKD(zj,wj)=1πm∏j<m1(1−zjwj‾)2.

If instead one uses the distinguished torus Tm with product normalized Haar measure as the boundary, the monomials are orthonormal and the corresponding reproducing kernel is

Σ(z,w)=∑α∈Nmzαwα‾=∏j<m11−zjwj‾,

with reciprocal power 1 instead of the Bergman kernel’s 2. For m≥2, this uses a proper subset of the topological boundary and its product Haar measure; the library’s smooth-hypersurface Szegő definition does not apply to that polydisc. For m=1, the torus is the circle and Σ is precisely the disc Szegő kernel for normalized surface measure.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The only choice assumption is ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), inherited through the Bergman, Hardy and Hilbert-space suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is used.

[F1]

The monomials form complete orthogonal systems of A2(D) and of A2(Dm) with squared norms π/(k+1) and πm/∏j<m(αj+1) respectively; dividing each monomial by its norm gives a complete orthonormal system (Monomials form complete orthogonal systems of the Bergman spaces of the disc, the ball and the polydisc).

[F2]

For any complete orthonormal system (eα) of a Bergman space one has KΩ(z,w)=∑αeα(z)eα(w)‾, the finite-subset sums converging in A2(Ω) (A2(Ω) is closed, and the Bergman kernel is the sum over any complete orthonormal system).

[F3]

The disc kernel is KD(ζ,η)=1π(1−ζη‾)2, and the polydisc kernel is the displayed product formula (Bergman kernels of the disc, ball and polydisc, and Szegő kernels of the disc and ball).

[F5]

The monomials are orthonormal on the distinguished torus: ∫Tmζαζβ‾ dmTm=δαβ (Monomial integrals on the sphere and orthonormality on the distinguished torus).

[F6]

For a complete orthonormal family, the finite-subset Fourier sums converge in norm to each vector (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space).

[F8]

The inner product is continuous in its second variable: ∣⟨f,g⟩∣≤∥f∥2∥g∥2 (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥ ∥y∥, with equality exactly for dependent pairs).

[F9]

The polydisc and its distinguished torus are Dm={z:∣zj∣<1} and Tm with product normalized Haar measure (Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in Cm, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral).

[F10]

For m≥2 the topological boundary of the polydisc is not a C1 hypersurface, so the library's surface-measure Szegő definition does not apply to it; the distinguished torus is a proper subset of that boundary (The polydisc boundary is not a smooth hypersurface, so the Szegő definition does not apply, The Hardy boundary space, Szegő projection and Szegő kernel on a smoothly bounded domain).

[F12]

Under ACω, complex L2 is Hilbert; a closed linear subspace is therefore complete (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

[F14]

Verification

technique · direct, from the complete polydisc monomial system and torus orthonormality

Given: ACω, the unit polydisc Dm with Lebesgue measure, and the distinguished torus Tm with product normalized Haar measure.

1.1A1F1F2F3

By [F1] and [F2], the complete monomial expansion is KDm(z,w)=π−m∑α∈Nm∏j<m(αj+1)(zjwj‾)αj. The model theorem [F3] identifies this sum as π−m∏j<m(1−zjwj‾)−2, and its disc formula identifies each factor as KD(zj,wj). This is the stated Bergman product.

1.2A1F5F7F9F12F14algebra

The monomial classes are orthonormal by [F5]. Let H∂2 be their closed linear span in the Hilbert space [F12]; they form a complete orthonormal system there by construction. For z∈Dm, [F7] gives ∑α∣zα∣2=∏j<m(1−∣zj∣2)−1<∞. More strongly, ∑α∣zα∣=∏j<m(1−∣zj∣)−1<∞: box partial sums of the nonnegative family factor as products of finite geometric sums, and every finite index set lies in a box. Thus Σ(z,ζ):=∑αzαζα‾ converges absolutely and uniformly for ζ∈Tm. For complex ∣t∣<1, absolute convergence follows from ∑k≥0∣t∣k<∞, so [F14] supplies the complex sum. The finite telescoping identity (1−t)∑k=0Ntk=1−tN+1 gives ∑k≥0tk=(1−t)−1, since the real geometric convergence in [F7] makes ∣t∣N+1→0. Applying this identity coordinatewise and taking limits of finite box products gives Σ(z,ζ)=∏j<m(1−zjζj‾)−1. Haar measure has mass one, so uniform convergence implies L2 convergence; conjugating the polynomial sums shows kz:=Σ(z,⋅)‾∈H∂2, with ∥kz∥22=∑α∣zα∣2.

2.1A1F5F6F8F12F13step 1.2

Let f∈H∂2. By [F6] its Fourier sums pN(ζ)=∑∣α∣≤Ncαζα, with cα=⟨f,ζα⟩, converge in L2 to f; degree cutoffs contain every finite index set eventually. Orthogonality gives ∑α∣cα∣2=∥f∥22 by passing to the limit in ∥pN∥22. Cauchy–Schwarz and step 1.2 show that f~(z):=∑αcαzα is absolutely convergent. On ∣zj∣≤rj<1, the degree tail is bounded by (∑∣α∣>N∣cα∣2)1/2∏j<m(1−rj2)−1/2, which tends to zero uniformly. The polynomial extensions therefore converge locally uniformly, and [F13] makes f~ holomorphic. Pairing the finite sums with kz and passing to the norm limit gives ⟨f,kz⟩=f~(z) and ∣f~(z)∣≤∥f∥2∏j<m(1−∣zj∣2)−1/2. The extension of kw has coefficients wα‾, so its value at z is Σ(z,w), the displayed reproducing kernel.

3.1F3F9F10step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

The Bergman product in step 1.1 has reciprocal powers 2, whereas the torus kernel in steps 1.2–2.1 has powers 1. For m≥2, [F10] shows that the distinguished torus is a proper subset of the nonsmooth topological boundary, so the surface-measure Szegő definition does not apply to Dm. For m=1, the torus is ∂D and [F3] gives the same normalized-circle Szegő kernel (1−zw‾)−1. These are exactly the asserted comparisons.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

167 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources