Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A boundary score cone differs from its tangent space

Example

Assume the general DQM density-version convention uses AC and the mean-zero Hilbert-space convention uses Countable Choice; the two-point densities below are explicit, so this proof itself makes no choice. Let X={−1,+1} with all subsets measurable and let Pθ{x}=(1+θx)/2 for θ∈[0,1]. At the boundary law P0, consider allowed one-sided paths t↦Pθ(t) with θ(0)=0, θ(t)∈[0,1], and an existing right derivative at zero. Their DQM score set is the cone {aX:a≥0}, while its closed linear tangent space is all of L02(P0)={bX:b∈R}. Thus the score set and its linear tangent space are distinct.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and Countable Choice, the restricted model {Pθ:0≤θ≤1} on the two-point sample space, based at P0.

[A1]

AC is the axiom that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable Choice gives a choice function for every countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

A one-sided DQM score satisfies pt=p+(t/2)sp+oL2(t) (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).

[F2]

Such a score has mean zero and is unique P0-almost surely (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).

[F3]

The tangent set records the scores of allowed paths; the tangent space is the closure of their linear span (Tangent set of a statistical model at a law, Closed tangent space).

[F4]

The full power set is a sigma-algebra, and a measurable space is a set with a specified sigma-algebra (Sigma-algebras, Measurable spaces and measurable sets).

[F5]

Counting measure assigns a finite set its cardinality; on this two-point sample space its total mass is two (Counting measure on an arbitrary set).

[F6]

Counting measure is a measure, and a finite measure is sigma-finite (Counting measure is a measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).

[F7]

For every x>0, the square-root function is differentiable with derivative 1/(2x) (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).

[F8]

Under Countable Choice, L02(P0) is closed in L2(P0) (The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space).

Verification

technique · Identify every one-sided score and compare its cone with its real linear span
1.1givenF4F5F6algebra

Every subset of {−1,+1} and its complement lie in the full power set, and every countable union of such subsets is still a subset; thus the power set is a sigma-algebra by [F4], and with this sigma-algebra the sample set is a measurable space by [F4]. Counting measure on the two-point set is a measure of total mass two by [F5, F6], hence sigma-finite by the constant sequence of covers En={−1,+1}; its only null set is empty. For every θ∈[0,1], the masses (1+θ)/2 and (1−θ)/2 are nonnegative and sum to one, so Pθ is a probability measure dominated by counting measure. At θ=0 both masses are 1/2, so p0(x)=1/2.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

If a one-sided DQM path has score s, [F1] on each atom gives Pθ(t){x}=1/2+ts(x)/(22)+o(t). Squaring each expansion yields Pθ(t){x}=1/2+ts(x)/2+o(t).

2.2givenA1F1F7step 1.1algebra

Conversely, for each a≥0, take θ(t)=at for sufficiently small t≥0. Then Pθ(t){x}=(1+atx)/2, and [F7] at 1/2 gives Pθ(t){x}=1/2+tax/(22)+o(t) on each atom. The two-coordinate counting-measure L2 remainder is o(t), so this path has score aX. Its densities are explicit, so [A1] requires no selection in this construction. Thus every vector on the nonnegative ray is an allowed score.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra

Subtract the two mass expansions from step 2.1. Since θ(t)=Pθ(t){+1}−Pθ(t){−1}, we get θ(t)/t→(s(+1)−s(−1))/2. By [F2], P0s=(s(+1)+s(−1))/2=0, so this limit equals s(+1). The constraints θ(t)≥0 and t>0 force the limit a:=s(+1) to be nonnegative, and s(−1)=−a; hence every score is s(x)=ax with a≥0.

4.1A2F3F8step 2.2algebra∎

The real span of {aX:a≥0} is {bX:b∈R}, and every mean-zero function on the equiprobable two-point space has values (b,−b), so this span is L02(P0). This space is closed in L2(P0) by [F8], hence its closure—and therefore the tangent space by [F3]—is L02(P0). It strictly contains the non-linear score cone because X is in the cone but −X is not.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.