Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.

Semiparametric Models and Tangent Spaces — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples show how bounded mean-zero perturbations generate the unrestricted tangent space, compute the score and information in a regular Bernoulli path, and contrast a one-sided boundary score cone with its closed linear span.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Bounded mean-zero scores generate the unrestricted tangent space

Example

Assume the library's Axiom-of-Choice density convention in A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel and Countable Choice for The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space. Let P be any probability law and take the unrestricted dominated model M={Q:Q≪P}. Its allowed paths are all one-sided DQM paths through P with common dominator P. Every bounded mean-zero s∈L02(P) is such a path score, and the tangent space is all of L02(P). All densities constructed below are explicit, so the example's proof makes no density-selection choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice, a probability measure P, and a bounded measurable representative s with Ps=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice permits selecting from an arbitrary family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable Choice permits selecting from a countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

A DQM path with common dominator P has root-density expansion pt=1+(t/2)s+oL2(P)(t) (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).

[F2]

Every DQM score is in L02(P) (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).

[F3]

L02(P) is the mean-zero subspace of the quotient L2(P) (Mean-zero square-integrable functions).

[F4]

The tangent space is the L2(P)-norm closure of the finite linear span of allowed scores (Closed tangent space).

[F5]

Dominated convergence applies to pointwise-convergent functions dominated by an integrable function (Dominated convergence).

[F6]

On a probability space, ∣Pg∣≤∥g∥2 for g∈L2(P) by Cauchy–Schwarz against 1 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F7]

Under Countable Choice, L02(P) is closed in L2(P) (The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space).

[F8]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

Verification

technique · Construct normalized square-root perturbations, then use centered truncations
1.1F2F3F7A2

Every allowed score is in L02(P) by [F2]; because L02(P) is closed in L2(P) by [F7] under [A2], its closed tangent space is contained in L02(P).

1.2givenF3algebra

Let M=sup⁡x∈X∣s(x)∣<∞ for the bounded representative in Given, and choose 0<ϵ<(1+M)−1. For 0≤t<ϵ, let at=1+ts/2, ct=P(at2)=1+t2Ps2/4, and pt=at2/ct. The bound on t makes at≥0; ct>0 and Ppt=1, so pt is a probability density with respect to P.

1.3F3F5F6F8algebra

Let f∈L02(P) and choose a measurable representative. Define um=(−m)∨(f∧m). Then ∣um−f∣2≤f21{∣f∣>m}, whose right side tends pointwise to zero and is dominated by the integrable f2. By [F5], ∥um−f∥2→0. Put sm=um−Pum; it is bounded and Psm=0 by [F8] and P1=1. Also [F6] and [F8] give ∣Pum∣=∣P(um−f)∣≤∥um−f∥2. Therefore ∥sm−f∥2≤2∥um−f∥2→0.

2.1step 1.2F1A1algebra

Since ∥at∥2=ct, ∥pt−1−(t/2)s∥2=∥at/ct−at∥2=∣1−ct∣=O(t2)=o(t). The density family is explicit, so it fits [A1]'s general convention without any selection. Thus Pt=ptP is an allowed DQM path with score s, and every bounded mean-zero score lies in the tangent set.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3∎

Each sm is a tangent score by step 2.1, and the sequence converges to the arbitrary f∈L02(P) by step 1.3. Hence the tangent space contains L02(P) by [F4]; step 1.1 gives the reverse inclusion. Thus the tangent space is exactly L02(P).

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A regular Bernoulli submodel and its score

Example

Under the Axiom-of-Choice density convention of A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel, let p∈(0,1) and choose 0<δ<min⁡(p,1−p). On {0,1} with the full power-set sigma-algebra and counting measure, let Pt{1}=p+t and Pt{0}=1−p−t for ∣t∣<δ. This two-sided regular path, restricted to t≥0, is DQM at zero with score

s(1)=1p,s(0)=−11−p,

which has Ps=0 and Ps2=1/[p(1−p)]. The densities with respect to counting measure are displayed explicitly, so the finite-path calculation makes no choice of versions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, p∈(0,1), and 0<δ<min⁡(p,1−p).

[A1]

AC permits selecting representatives from an arbitrary family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

A common-dominated path is DQM when its square-root densities have an L2 first-order expansion with coefficient s/2 (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).

[F2]

The score is an equivalence class in L2(P) and DQM scores have mean zero (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).

[F3]

A probability measure is nonnegative and has total mass one (Probability measures and probability spaces).

[F4]

The full power set is a sigma-algebra, and a measurable space is a set with a specified sigma-algebra (Sigma-algebras, Measurable spaces and measurable sets).

[F5]

Counting measure assigns a finite set its cardinality; on the two-point sample space its total mass is two (Counting measure on an arbitrary set).

[F6]

The counting set function is a measure, and a finite measure is sigma-finite by the one-set cover (Counting measure is a measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).

[F7]

For every x>0, the square-root function is differentiable with derivative 1/(2x) (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).

Verification

technique · Expand the two square-root masses on the finite sample space
1.1givenF3F4F5F6algebra

Every subset of {0,1} and its complement lie in the full power set, and every countable union of such subsets is still a subset; thus the power set is a sigma-algebra by [F4], and with this sigma-algebra the sample set is a measurable space by [F4]. Counting measure on this two-point set is a measure of total mass two by [F5, F6], hence sigma-finite by the constant sequence of covers En={0,1} in [F6]. Its only null set is empty, so each Pt is absolutely continuous with respect to it. The choice of δ ensures p+t>0 and 1−p−t>0 throughout ∣t∣<δ; the displayed masses sum to one, so each Pt is a probability measure.

2.1step 1.1F1F7A1algebra

Since p,1−p>0, [F7] and the definition of derivative give p+t=p+t/(2p)+o(t) and 1−p−t=1−p−t/(21−p)+o(t). These are exactly the two coordinates of p+(t/2)sp+o(t) for the stated s; because counting-measure L2 on two points is the Euclidean norm, the combined remainder is o(t). The density versions are explicit, so the calculation uses [A1]'s convention without a selection. Thus the path is DQM with this score by [F1].

3.1F2algebra∎

Direct calculation gives Ps=p(1/p)+(1−p)(−1/(1−p))=0 and Ps2=p/p2+(1−p)/(1−p)2=1/[p(1−p)]<∞. Hence the score is in L02(P) and has the stated variance.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A boundary score cone differs from its tangent space

Example

Assume the general DQM density-version convention uses AC and the mean-zero Hilbert-space convention uses Countable Choice; the two-point densities below are explicit, so this proof itself makes no choice. Let X={−1,+1} with all subsets measurable and let Pθ{x}=(1+θx)/2 for θ∈[0,1]. At the boundary law P0, consider allowed one-sided paths t↦Pθ(t) with θ(0)=0, θ(t)∈[0,1], and an existing right derivative at zero. Their DQM score set is the cone {aX:a≥0}, while its closed linear tangent space is all of L02(P0)={bX:b∈R}. Thus the score set and its linear tangent space are distinct.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and Countable Choice, the restricted model {Pθ:0≤θ≤1} on the two-point sample space, based at P0.

[A1]

AC is the axiom that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable Choice gives a choice function for every countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

A one-sided DQM score satisfies pt=p+(t/2)sp+oL2(t) (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).

[F2]

Such a score has mean zero and is unique P0-almost surely (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).

[F3]

The tangent set records the scores of allowed paths; the tangent space is the closure of their linear span (Tangent set of a statistical model at a law, Closed tangent space).

[F4]

The full power set is a sigma-algebra, and a measurable space is a set with a specified sigma-algebra (Sigma-algebras, Measurable spaces and measurable sets).

[F5]

Counting measure assigns a finite set its cardinality; on this two-point sample space its total mass is two (Counting measure on an arbitrary set).

[F6]

Counting measure is a measure, and a finite measure is sigma-finite (Counting measure is a measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).

[F7]

For every x>0, the square-root function is differentiable with derivative 1/(2x) (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).

[F8]

Under Countable Choice, L02(P0) is closed in L2(P0) (The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space).

Verification

technique · Identify every one-sided score and compare its cone with its real linear span
1.1givenF4F5F6algebra

Every subset of {−1,+1} and its complement lie in the full power set, and every countable union of such subsets is still a subset; thus the power set is a sigma-algebra by [F4], and with this sigma-algebra the sample set is a measurable space by [F4]. Counting measure on the two-point set is a measure of total mass two by [F5, F6], hence sigma-finite by the constant sequence of covers En={−1,+1}; its only null set is empty. For every θ∈[0,1], the masses (1+θ)/2 and (1−θ)/2 are nonnegative and sum to one, so Pθ is a probability measure dominated by counting measure. At θ=0 both masses are 1/2, so p0(x)=1/2.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

If a one-sided DQM path has score s, [F1] on each atom gives Pθ(t){x}=1/2+ts(x)/(22)+o(t). Squaring each expansion yields Pθ(t){x}=1/2+ts(x)/2+o(t).

2.2givenA1F1F7step 1.1algebra

Conversely, for each a≥0, take θ(t)=at for sufficiently small t≥0. Then Pθ(t){x}=(1+atx)/2, and [F7] at 1/2 gives Pθ(t){x}=1/2+tax/(22)+o(t) on each atom. The two-coordinate counting-measure L2 remainder is o(t), so this path has score aX. Its densities are explicit, so [A1] requires no selection in this construction. Thus every vector on the nonnegative ray is an allowed score.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra

Subtract the two mass expansions from step 2.1. Since θ(t)=Pθ(t){+1}−Pθ(t){−1}, we get θ(t)/t→(s(+1)−s(−1))/2. By [F2], P0s=(s(+1)+s(−1))/2=0, so this limit equals s(+1). The constraints θ(t)≥0 and t>0 force the limit a:=s(+1) to be nonnegative, and s(−1)=−a; hence every score is s(x)=ax with a≥0.

4.1A2F3F8step 2.2algebra∎

The real span of {aX:a≥0} is {bX:b∈R}, and every mean-zero function on the equiprobable two-point space has values (b,−b), so this span is L02(P0). This space is closed in L2(P0) by [F8], hence its closure—and therefore the tangent space by [F3]—is L02(P0). It strictly contains the non-linear score cone because X is in the cone but −X is not.