How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Semiparametric Models and Tangent Spaces — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Domination and Likelihood Ratios
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semiparametric Models and Tangent Spaces
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Statistical Experiments, Models and Identifiability
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The examples show how bounded mean-zero perturbations generate the unrestricted tangent space, compute the score and information in a regular Bernoulli path, and contrast a one-sided boundary score cone with its closed linear span.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Bounded mean-zero scores generate the unrestricted tangent space
Example
Assume the library's Axiom-of-Choice density convention in A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel and Countable Choice for The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space. Let be any probability law and take the unrestricted dominated model . Its allowed paths are all one-sided DQM paths through with common dominator . Every bounded mean-zero is such a path score, and the tangent space is all of . All densities constructed below are explicit, so the example's proof makes no density-selection choice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice, a probability measure , and a bounded measurable representative with .
The Axiom of Choice permits selecting from an arbitrary family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
Countable Choice permits selecting from a countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A DQM path with common dominator has root-density expansion (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).
Every DQM score is in (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).
is the mean-zero subspace of the quotient (Mean-zero square-integrable functions).
The tangent space is the -norm closure of the finite linear span of allowed scores (Closed tangent space).
Dominated convergence applies to pointwise-convergent functions dominated by an integrable function (Dominated convergence).
On a probability space, for by Cauchy–Schwarz against (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for ).
Under Countable Choice, is closed in (The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space).
The Lebesgue integral is linear on (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
Verification
Every allowed score is in by [F2]; because is closed in by [F7] under [A2], its closed tangent space is contained in .
Let for the bounded representative in Given, and choose . For , let , , and . The bound on makes ; and , so is a probability density with respect to .
Let and choose a measurable representative. Define . Then , whose right side tends pointwise to zero and is dominated by the integrable . By [F5], . Put ; it is bounded and by [F8] and . Also [F6] and [F8] give . Therefore .
Since , . The density family is explicit, so it fits [A1]'s general convention without any selection. Thus is an allowed DQM path with score , and every bounded mean-zero score lies in the tangent set.
Each is a tangent score by step 2.1, and the sequence converges to the arbitrary by step 1.3. Hence the tangent space contains by [F4]; step 1.1 gives the reverse inclusion. Thus the tangent space is exactly .
A regular Bernoulli submodel and its score
Example
Under the Axiom-of-Choice density convention of A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel, let and choose . On with the full power-set sigma-algebra and counting measure, let and for . This two-sided regular path, restricted to , is DQM at zero with score
which has and . The densities with respect to counting measure are displayed explicitly, so the finite-path calculation makes no choice of versions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, , and .
AC permits selecting representatives from an arbitrary family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).
A common-dominated path is DQM when its square-root densities have an first-order expansion with coefficient (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).
The score is an equivalence class in and DQM scores have mean zero (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).
A probability measure is nonnegative and has total mass one (Probability measures and probability spaces).
The full power set is a sigma-algebra, and a measurable space is a set with a specified sigma-algebra (Sigma-algebras, Measurable spaces and measurable sets).
Counting measure assigns a finite set its cardinality; on the two-point sample space its total mass is two (Counting measure on an arbitrary set).
The counting set function is a measure, and a finite measure is sigma-finite by the one-set cover (Counting measure is a measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).
For every , the square-root function is differentiable with derivative (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).
Verification
Every subset of and its complement lie in the full power set, and every countable union of such subsets is still a subset; thus the power set is a sigma-algebra by [F4], and with this sigma-algebra the sample set is a measurable space by [F4]. Counting measure on this two-point set is a measure of total mass two by [F5, F6], hence sigma-finite by the constant sequence of covers in [F6]. Its only null set is empty, so each is absolutely continuous with respect to it. The choice of ensures and throughout ; the displayed masses sum to one, so each is a probability measure.
Since , [F7] and the definition of derivative give and . These are exactly the two coordinates of for the stated ; because counting-measure on two points is the Euclidean norm, the combined remainder is . The density versions are explicit, so the calculation uses [A1]'s convention without a selection. Thus the path is DQM with this score by [F1].
Direct calculation gives and . Hence the score is in and has the stated variance.
A boundary score cone differs from its tangent space
Example
Assume the general DQM density-version convention uses AC and the mean-zero Hilbert-space convention uses Countable Choice; the two-point densities below are explicit, so this proof itself makes no choice. Let with all subsets measurable and let for . At the boundary law , consider allowed one-sided paths with , , and an existing right derivative at zero. Their DQM score set is the cone , while its closed linear tangent space is all of . Thus the score set and its linear tangent space are distinct.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and Countable Choice, the restricted model on the two-point sample space, based at .
AC is the axiom that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
Countable Choice gives a choice function for every countable family of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A one-sided DQM score satisfies (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).
Such a score has mean zero and is unique -almost surely (A DQM score has mean zero and is unique).
The tangent set records the scores of allowed paths; the tangent space is the closure of their linear span (Tangent set of a statistical model at a law, Closed tangent space).
The full power set is a sigma-algebra, and a measurable space is a set with a specified sigma-algebra (Sigma-algebras, Measurable spaces and measurable sets).
Counting measure assigns a finite set its cardinality; on this two-point sample space its total mass is two (Counting measure on an arbitrary set).
Counting measure is a measure, and a finite measure is sigma-finite (Counting measure is a measure, Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).
For every , the square-root function is differentiable with derivative (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).
Under Countable Choice, is closed in (The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space).
Verification
Every subset of and its complement lie in the full power set, and every countable union of such subsets is still a subset; thus the power set is a sigma-algebra by [F4], and with this sigma-algebra the sample set is a measurable space by [F4]. Counting measure on the two-point set is a measure of total mass two by [F5, F6], hence sigma-finite by the constant sequence of covers ; its only null set is empty. For every , the masses and are nonnegative and sum to one, so is a probability measure dominated by counting measure. At both masses are , so .
If a one-sided DQM path has score , [F1] on each atom gives . Squaring each expansion yields .
Conversely, for each , take for sufficiently small . Then , and [F7] at gives on each atom. The two-coordinate counting-measure remainder is , so this path has score . Its densities are explicit, so [A1] requires no selection in this construction. Thus every vector on the nonnegative ray is an allowed score.
Subtract the two mass expansions from step 2.1. Since , we get . By [F2], , so this limit equals . The constraints and force the limit to be nonnegative, and ; hence every score is with .
The real span of is , and every mean-zero function on the equiprobable two-point space has values , so this span is . This space is closed in by [F8], hence its closure—and therefore the tangent space by [F3]—is . It strictly contains the non-linear score cone because is in the cone but is not.