How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Semiparametric Models and Tangent Spaces
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Domination and Likelihood Ratios
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Statistical Experiments, Models and Identifiability
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page builds semiparametric score geometry from common-dominated paths that are differentiable in quadratic mean. It proves score mean-zero and uniqueness, defines the tangent set and its closed linear span separately, and fixes the nuisance tangent space by designated paths with zero right derivative of the target. It also records the nuisance orthogonal complement in the mean-zero Hilbert space. Countable Choice is the exact assumption used for completeness; the broader likelihood-density convention retains its separate Axiom-of-Choice dependency. One-sided boundary score cones remain distinct from their linear tangent spaces.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Mean-zero square-integrable functions
Definition
Let be a probability measure on . Here is the real space of square-integrable measurable functions modulo equality -almost surely, with its usual quotient norm (The space as the quotient by null functions, The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for ). For , the integral is finite and independent of the representative: Cauchy–Schwarz on the probability space gives , and the expectation of integrable representatives is invariant under almost-sure equality (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for , Expectation depends only on the almost-everywhere class).
Define the mean-zero square-integrable space by
It carries the norm inherited from . Countable Choice is not needed for this definition; a later local Hilbert-space argument uses it only to inherit completeness from the library's general Hilbert-space result.
A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel
Definition
Let be a model of probability measures on a measurable space , let , and let be a path for with . It is dominated by a common measure when one supplied sigma-finite positive measure satisfies for every (Dominated statistical experiments). Write and for simultaneously supplied nonnegative density versions; the existence and normalization of each density are the Radon–Nikodym properties in Likelihood densities and A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density. The Axiom of Choice is the library convention for selecting such a family of versions along a path (The Axiom of Choice). The DQM property below is unchanged by replacing any by another version, since each norm is unchanged by a -null modification.
The path is differentiable in quadratic mean at , with score , when
Here means that the displayed norm divided by tends to as ; and are quotient spaces modulo almost-everywhere equality (The space as the quotient by null functions). The definition is directional. A two-sided regular submodel qualifies by restricting it to . No mean-zero condition is assumed in this definition.
The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). For any probability measure , the space of Mean-zero square-integrable functions is a closed real linear subspace of real with pairing ; consequently it is a real Hilbert space (Hilbert space). The only choice use is the Countable Choice assumption already required by the general completeness supplier.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and a probability measure on .
Countable Choice is the stated selection principle (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Under Countable Choice, real with pairing is a complete real inner-product space ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
Cauchy–Schwarz in an inner-product space gives (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
, with well-defined on equivalence classes (Mean-zero square-integrable functions).
Proof
The constant function belongs to and has norm , since . For each , the pairing in [F1] satisfies , so [F2] gives . Thus is a bounded linear functional, and its kernel is exactly by [F3].
The kernel is linear. If and in , then by step 1.1 and linearity of the pairing [F1], so . Hence the kernel is closed.
Every Cauchy sequence in is Cauchy in , which is complete by [F1] under the Countable Choice assumption [A1]; its limit lies in by step 2.1. The restricted inner product is therefore complete, proving the asserted Hilbert-space property.
A DQM score has mean zero and is unique
Statement
Assume the density-version convention for the path in A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel. If is a DQM score, then , so (Mean-zero square-integrable functions). Moreover, any two scores satisfying the same DQM expansion agree -almost surely. The normalization argument itself uses no choice beyond the density versions already supplied in the definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A common-dominated probability path through , with density versions and a DQM score .
DQM means as (A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel).
A Radon–Nikodym density represents by for every measurable (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density).
The pairing is finite and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for ).
The Lebesgue integral is linear on (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
Proof
Put , , and . By [F1], , while [F2] gives and .
If is another score with remainder , subtracting its expansion from [F1] gives .
Set . Since , we have and . The products and are integrable by [F3]. Pointwise expansion and linearity [F4] give . By [F3], and . Dividing by and taking gives .
Divide by and let . Then , so as an element of . Together with step 2.1 this proves mean zero and uniqueness.
Tangent set of a statistical model at a law
Definition
Fix a model containing a law and designate a collection of allowed submodels through . Each allowed submodel is a one-sided DQM path as in A dominated differentiable-in-quadratic-mean submodel. Its score is the -almost-sure equivalence class proved unique by A DQM score has mean zero and is unique, and it belongs to (Mean-zero square-integrable functions).
The tangent set is the set of scores of the designated paths. The model specification determines which paths are allowed. In particular, the tangent set need not be a linear space: it may be a cone, meaning it is closed under multiplication by nonnegative real scalars, while failing closure under negative scalars. One-sided restrictions can produce this behavior. The closed linear span of the tangent set is a separate construction.
Closed tangent space
Definition
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) so that is the real Hilbert space established by The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space. For a tangent set , its linear span is the set of all finite real linear combinations of elements of ; the span of the empty set is . Its tangent space is the closure of that span in the norm. The closure consists of limits of sequences from the span, equivalently of points every positive-radius norm ball around which meets the span.
The tangent set itself is retained separately and may be a cone rather than a vector space.
A tangent space is a closed linear subspace
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be any tangent set in the real Hilbert space . Its tangent space , defined as the norm closure of its finite real linear span (Closed tangent space), is a closed linear subspace of (Linear subspace of a vector space).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a probability law , and a tangent set .
Countable Choice is the selection principle required by the general completeness supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The tangent space is the norm closure of all finite real linear combinations of tangent-set scores (Closed tangent space).
Under Countable Choice, is a complete real inner-product space (The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space).
A linear subspace is a subset containing the zero vector and closed under addition and real scalar multiplication (Linear subspace of a vector space).
Proof
Let be the finite real span in [F1]. By collecting coefficients of each score, the sum of two finite linear combinations is another finite linear combination; scalar multiples have the same form, and is the empty sum. Thus is a linear subspace by [F3].
If , some has . For any with , the triangle inequality gives , so . Hence the complement of is open and is closed.
Write . If and , choose with and . Then and , so . For , if then ; if , choose with , giving and . Thus is linear.
A Cauchy sequence in converges in by [F2] under [A1]. Since is closed by step 1.2, that limit lies in . Therefore the tangent space is complete as well as a closed linear subspace, as asserted.
Nuisance tangent space
Definition
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), as required by the ambient Hilbert-space and tangent-space conventions. Let be a model through , let be a specified finite-dimensional parameter-of-interest functional, and let the model designate its nuisance submodels. A nuisance submodel is a designated allowed DQM path through for which the right derivative exists and is the zero vector in . Its score belongs to the tangent set (Tangent set of a statistical model at a law).
The nuisance tangent space is the norm closure in of the finite real linear span of scores of nuisance submodels. It is a closed linear subspace by Closed tangent space and A tangent space is a closed linear subspace. The designated nuisance submodels are part of the model specification; this definition does not assert that every path with zero first-order target derivative is nuisance unless the model designates it as such.
Orthogonal complement of a nuisance tangent space
Definition
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), so that is the real Hilbert space of The mean-zero L² space is a Hilbert space. The orthogonal complement of the nuisance tangent space within is
This is the ordinary orthogonal complement from Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement applied in the mean-zero Hilbert space, not in all of . It is a closed linear subspace by Orthogonal complements are closed.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.