How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A cancelling zero-one handle pair
Example
Assume . In dimension attach a -handle to a compact manifold as a disjoint ball and then attach a -handle by an embedding whose attaching -sphere consists of one point on the new boundary sphere of (its belt sphere) and one point on . In the endpoint convention of the definition the pair is geometrically cancelling, exactly one point of the -sphere lying in the belt sphere with transversality automatic, and relative to . The local model is the identity : two -balls joined by a -handle are one -ball.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Dimension , a compact manifold , a -handle attached as a disjoint ball and a -handle attached by an embedding whose attaching -sphere has one point on the new boundary sphere of and one point on .
Geometrically cancelling adjacent handle pair and K handle core cocore attaching region and belt sphere: the belt sphere of a -handle is the new boundary sphere (disconnected when ), the attaching sphere of a -handle is a -sphere, and the endpoint convention counts exactly one point of the -sphere lying in the belt sphere, transversality being automatic.
The standard complementary pair fills a ball: for the standard embedding the union of the standard -handle and the standard -handle is an -disc: in its case the standard complementary pair fills the ball, i.e. for the standard hemisphere embedding.
Handle cancellation, Attaching a smooth handle with corner rounding and The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume ; a geometrically cancelling pair may be deleted, giving a diffeomorphism relative to the incoming boundary; attachments are formed with corners rounded. The assumption is used through the standard-pair model of [F2] and through this deletion.
Verification
Given: The configuration of the statement.
The attaching -sphere of consists of two points, one on the belt sphere of the attached -handle and one on ; in the endpoint convention of [F1] exactly one point of the -sphere lies in the belt sphere, with transversality automatic in these dimensions. Hence the pair is geometrically cancelling.
The local model is [F2] with : two -balls joined by a -handle form one -ball, , and the total is the boundary connected sum of with a disc along the point of at which the second foot lands.
By [F3] the cancelling pair may be deleted from ; equivalently the boundary connected sum with a disc is again, so relative to . The attaching-belt matrix is not defined for (the definition requires ), so this endpoint case is handled directly by the geometric criterion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. T. C. Wall, Differential Topology (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 156; complete PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Wolfgang Lück, A Basic Introduction to Surgery Theory (ICTP lecture notes; complete author PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)