Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Path determinants dk=dk−1−cos⁡2(π/m)dk−2 and the three-arm inequality

Example

(i) Path recursion. Let Γ be the path s1−⋯−sn with labels m1,…,mn−1 (n≥1) and cosine matrix C (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Coxeter diagrams: edges, labels, components and finite type), and let dk be the determinant of the leading k×k principal submatrix of C. Then cos⁡(π/∞):=1 is the coefficient convention. Then d0=1, d1=1, and dk=dk−1−cos⁡2(π/mk−1) dk−2(2≤k≤n). For the path with all labels 3 this gives dk=(k+1)/2k and det⁡(2C)=n+1; for a path whose only label ≥4 is m on the edge between the i-th and (i+1)-st vertices, positive definiteness requires the constraint (i+1)(j+1)>4ijcos⁡2(π/m) of Exclusions for positive definite diagrams: trees, valency, labels, chains and arms (5)(ii), with j=n−i.

(ii) The three-arm inequality. For the star with central vertex v and three arms of p,q,r≥1 vertices, all edges labelled 3, positive definiteness is equivalent to 1p+1+1q+1+1r+1>1.

(iii) Numerical checks. The triples satisfying the inequality are, up to order, (1,1,r) for every r≥1 (type Dr+3), (1,2,2) (type E6), (1,2,3) (type E7) and (1,2,4) (type E8); the boundary cases (1,2,5) (type E9), (2,2,2) and (1,3,3) give equality 1, and the overlong star (1,2,5) has an explicitly non-positive vector, as treated in A cycle and an overlong arm: explicit non-positive witnesses.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The paths of (i) and the three-arm star of (ii), with their labelled diagrams, the space V=RS with Coxeter form B and cosine matrix C=(B(es,et))s,t∈S, the standard basis vectors es, and the leading minors dk of C.

[F1]

An edge of the diagram is present exactly when m(s,t)≥3 and carries the label m(s,t); the subdiagram on a vertex subset is the induced labelled graph (Coxeter diagrams: edges, labels, components and finite type).

[F2]

B(es,es)=1 and B(es,et)=−cos⁡(π/m(s,t)) for finite m(s,t); B(es,et)=−1 for m(s,t)=∞; B is symmetric and bilinear, so B(u,w)=∑s,t∈Su(s)w(t)B(es,et), and the es form a basis of V (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps).

[F4]

For every row i the determinant expands as det⁡A=∑kaikCik(A), where Cik(A) is the cofactor and A(i,k), the matrix with row i and column k deleted, is the deleted matrix (Laplace expansion computes the determinant along every row and every column over a commutative ring, Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring).

[F5]

Determinant is multilinear in the columns and normalized, so multiplying an n×n matrix by the scalar 2 multiplies its determinant by 2n, and the determinant of a block triangular matrix is the product of the determinants of its diagonal blocks (The determinant is the unique normalized alternating multilinear function on the columns, Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring).

[F7]

For c:=cos⁡(π/3) one has cos⁡(2π/3)=2c2−1 and cos⁡(2π/3)=−cos⁡(π/3)=−c, cosine is strictly decreasing on [0,π] and cos⁡π=−1 (Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); and for a real symmetric positive definite form on a subspace, B(u,w)2≤B(u,u)B(w,w) with equality exactly when u,w are linearly dependent (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors).

[F8]
[F9]

The standard irreducible diagrams of the classification are An (all labels 3), Dn (arms 1,1,n−3), E6,E7,E8 (arms 1,2,2; 1,2,3; 1,2,4), and the types Dr+3, E6,E7,E8 carry those diagrams (Classification of finite Coxeter systems, including the H and dihedral families (1)).

[F10]

The star with arms 1,2,5 has the explicit non-positive vector of A cycle and an overlong arm: explicit non-positive witnesses (ii), and the triple (1,2,5) fails the inequality of (ii) with equality.

Verification

1.1F1F2F4algebra

(The recursion by expansion.) Set d0:=1; the leading 1×1 matrix is (1), so d1=1 [F2]. For 2≤k≤n let Ck be the leading k×k submatrix and put a:=cos⁡(π/mk−1), with a=1 for an infinite label. By [F1, F2] its diagonal entries are 1, its adjacent off-diagonal entries are −cos⁡(π/mj) and all others are 0. In the last-row Laplace expansion [F4], the diagonal entry contributes dk−1. Deleting row k and column k−1 leaves a matrix whose last column has only its bottom entry −a; expanding that column gives determinant −adk−2, also for k=2 with the empty minor. The last-row cofactor sign at (k,k−1) is −1, so the other contribution is −a2dk−2. Therefore dk=dk−1−a2dk−2 without any positivity assumption.

1.2algebra

(The integer cases.) Let 1≤p≤q≤r satisfy the inequality of (ii). If p≥2 then 1p+1+1q+1+1r+1≤3⋅13=1 with equality only for p=q=r=2, so p=1. Then 1q+1+1r+1>12: for q=1 this holds for every r≥1; for q=2 it says 1r+1>16, i.e. r<5, so r∈{2,3,4}; and for q≥3 the sum is at most 14+14=12, a contradiction. Hence the triples are (1,1,r) for r≥1, (1,2,2), (1,2,3) and (1,2,4) up to order. The equality cases 1p+1+1q+1+1r+1=1 are found the same way: p≥3 gives a sum ≤34<1; p=2 forces q=r=2; and p=1 forces 1q+1+1r+1=12, i.e. q=2,r=5 or q=3,r=3. Thus (2,2,2), (1,2,5) and (1,3,3) are exactly the boundary triples.

2.1F5F6F7F8step 1.1algebra

(The all-3 path.) First cos⁡(π/3)=1/2: putting c=cos⁡(π/3), [F7] gives 2c2−1=cos⁡(2π/3)=−c, so (2c−1)(c+1)=0, and c>−1 because 0<π/3<π, cosine is strictly decreasing on [0,π] and cos⁡π=−1 [F7], hence c=1/2. If every label is 3, then cos⁡(π/mj)=1/2, so the recursion of 1.1 reads dk=dk−1−14dk−2 with d0=d1=1; by the induction principle [F8] the formula dk=(k+1)/2k holds for all k≥0, since k2k−1−14⋅k−12k−2=k+12k. Hence dk>0 for every k, the leading principal minors of 2C are 2kdk=k+1>0 by [F5], and 2C and C are positive definite by [F6]; in particular det⁡(2C)=2ndn=n+1.

3.1F4F6F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra

(One large edge: the two-subpath formula.) Let the path have all labels 3 except one edge labelled m between the i-th and (i+1)-st vertices, and put c:=cos⁡(π/m), j:=n−i≥1. Write δk:=(k+1)/2k for the determinant of an all-3 path on k vertices, including δ0=1, as proved in 2.1 [step 2.1]; these are distinct from the leading minors dk of the labelled path. Then det⁡C=δiδj−c2 δi−1δj−1. Proof by induction on j [F8], writing C(i,j) for this matrix: for j=1 the large edge is the last one and expansion along the last row [F4] gives det⁡C(i,1)=δi−c2δi−1=δiδ1−c2δi−1δ0; for j=2 the last edge has label 3, so the recurrence of 1.1 [step 1.1] gives det⁡C(i,2)=det⁡C(i,1)−14δi=δi(δ1−14δ0)−c2δi−1, which is δiδ2−c2δi−1δ1 since δ2=34; for j≥3 the last edge again has label 3, so det⁡C(i,j)=det⁡C(i,j−1)−14det⁡C(i,j−2), and substituting the induction hypothesis and the recursion δj=δj−1−14δj−2 of 2.1 [step 2.1] gives the formula. With δk=(k+1)/2k of 2.1 [step 2.1] this is det⁡C=(i+1)(j+1)−4ijc22 n; and since positive definiteness of the path would give det⁡C>0 by [F6], such a path satisfies (i+1)(j+1)>4ijcos⁡2(π/m), which is the constraint of Exclusions for positive definite diagrams: trees, valency, labels, chains and arms (5)(ii).

3.2F1F2F6step 2.1algebra

(The arm vectors.) For the star of (ii) with centre v and arm spans A1,A2,A3 on the three arms, V=Rev⊕A1⊕A2⊕A3 and the arm spans are pairwise B-orthogonal, because distinct arms share no edge [F1, F2]. On the arm with vertices s1,…,sp (sp adjacent to v) put w:=∑k=1pk esk. Then B(w,w)=∑k=1pk2−∑k=1p−1k(k+1)=p2−∑k=1p−1k=p(p+1)2 and B(ev,w)=−p2 by [F2], and for every u=∑k=1pukesk the identity B(w,u)=p+12 up holds, because the coefficient of uk in B(w,u) is k−k−12−k+12=0 for 1<k<p (also for k=1 when p>1), while the coefficient of up is p−p−12=p+12; for p=1 the coefficient is 1=(p+1)/2 directly. In particular B(ev,u)=−up2=−B(w,u)p+1 on the arm span. By 2.1 and [F6] the form restricted to each arm span (an all-3 path) is positive definite; hence B is positive definite on all of A=A1⊕A2⊕A3, since a nonzero element z1+z2+z3 has some nonzero component and B(z,z)=∑iB(zi,zi)≥B(zj,zj)>0.

4.1F2F6F7step 3.2algebra

(Completing the square: equivalence of positive definiteness and the inequality.) Keep the notation of 3.2 [step 3.2] with arms of p1,p2,p3 vertices and vectors w1,w2,w3, put μ:=∑ipi2(pi+1) and wˉ:=−∑iwipi+1∈A:=A1⊕A2⊕A3, so that wˉ≠0 because its components in the distinct summands are the nonzero multiples −wi/(pi+1). Then B(wˉ,u)=B(ev,u) for every u∈A by the last identity of 3.2 [step 3.2], and B(wˉ,wˉ)=∑ipi(pi+1)/2(pi+1)2=μ. Since wˉ is a nonzero vector of A, on which B is positive definite [step 3.2], every u∈V has a unique form u=αev+γwˉ+z with α,γ∈R, z∈A and B(wˉ,z)=0: the ev-coordinate α is forced, and u−αev∈A has the unique orthogonal decomposition γwˉ+z along wˉ in the inner product space (A,B), with γ=B(u−αev,wˉ)/B(wˉ,wˉ) and z=u−αev−γwˉ. Then B(u,u)=α2+2α(γB(ev,wˉ)+B(ev,z))+γ2B(wˉ,wˉ)+B(z,z)=α2(1−μ)+μ(γ+α)2+B(z,z), because B(ev,wˉ)=B(wˉ,wˉ)=μ and B(ev,z)=B(wˉ,z)=0 [F2]. If 1−μ>0 then B(u,u) is a sum of three terms that are ≥0 and is 0 only when α=0, γ=−α=0 and z=0, i.e. only for u=0; conversely, if 1−μ≤0, then u=ev−wˉ≠0 (its ev-coordinate is 1) has B(u,u)=1−μ≤0, so B is not positive definite [F6]. Hence B is positive definite if and only if 1−μ>0, and 1−μ>0 is equivalent to ∑ipipi+1<2, i.e. to 3−∑i1pi+1<2, which is the inequality of (ii). When B is positive definite, the same identity exhibits the strict Cauchy-Schwarz bound B(wˉ,wˉ)<B(ev,ev)=1 of the projection of ev onto A used in Exclusions for positive definite diagrams: trees, valency, labels, chains and arms (6), strict because ev∉A [F7].

5.1F9F10step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2step 4.1∎

(Conclusion.) The recursion and the all-3 values of (i) are steps 1.1 and 2.1 [step 1.1, step 2.1], and the two-subpath determinant formula giving the constraint (i+1)(j+1)>4ijcos⁡2(π/m) is step 3.1 [step 3.1]. The equivalence of (ii) is step 4.1 [step 4.1], proved by completing the square along the three positive definite arms of 3.2 [step 3.2]. The list of triples of (iii) and the boundary triples are step 1.2 [step 1.2], and the boundary star (1,2,5) is the one with the non-positive vector of A cycle and an overlong arm: explicit non-positive witnesses [F10]; the names Dr+3,E6,E7,E8 of the surviving triples are those of the classification [F9].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

89 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources