How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A stipulated cold two-stream periodic PIC experiment
Statement
Here is a fully specified cold two-stream input for the fixed- periodic grid model. Let , , , , , , and with steps to . For and , assign charge and mass and set Use the smooth assignment shape, neutralizing background, centered periodic Poisson solve, and exact-arithmetic update of Classical RK4 step for the fixed-grid regularized PIC particle ODE. The two beams are cold because each beam has one velocity value. This is a stipulated numerical experiment only: it asserts no growth rate, nonlinear saturation, or physical validation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite parameter tuple above, the two beam labels, and the fixed-regularization periodic PIC definitions.
Fixed-regularization periodic PIC pair kernel: the equal-weight particle system uses total charge , total mass , and the fixed smooth grid interaction kernel.
Periodic PIC deposition conserves charge and satisfies Poisson compatibility: normalized assignment deposits total charge , and subtracting gives a compatible zero-mean source.
Classical RK4 step for the fixed-grid regularized PIC particle ODE: the exact-arithmetic RK4 step evaluates the periodic PIC field at each stage and returns the updated particle state.
Proof
There are labels. Their positive charges sum to and their positive masses sum to . Within each fixed , every velocity equals , so the two populations are cold counter-streaming beams.
The stated positions are points of after reduction modulo , and is odd as required by the grid convention. At each of the finitely many RK4 stages, the smooth-shape deposition conserves charge ; subtracting the uniform background makes the source compatible by [F2]. By [F3], the exact finite Fourier Poisson solve therefore returns a potential at every stage, so this exact-arithmetic experiment is defined. No physical conclusion follows from this specification.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulation Using Particles, Chapters 2 and 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Myers, P. Colella, and B. Van Straalen, A 4th-Order Particle-in-Cell Method with Phase-Space Remapping for the Vlasov–Poisson Equation, Section 2 (standard reference, not scraped)