How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Point operations and the open closed constructible line
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and let be a field. (1) The constructible category of a point is the bounded derived category of finite-dimensional -vector spaces, (Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves). For the identity map of the point, all four pullback/pushforward operations are the identity functors of that category, the tensor product and internal Hom are the usual finite cochain constructions, and the dualizing object is concentrated in degree (Derived tensor–Hom and inverse/direct image for field sheaves ↗, Derived operations on analytic field sheaves ↗). (2) On the complex line with the open inclusion and the closed inclusion , there is a -linear short exact sequence of sheaves and its associated exact triangle is the ordinary localization triangle of the constructible derived category.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field , the point with its unique stratification, and the complex line with and . The point-operation clauses use the actual ordinary-operations lemma and the exceptional-candidate Definition named by the two later-page forward references.
is the full subcategory of of complexes with bounded, algebraically constructible cohomology, constructibility being local constancy of finite rank on the strata of a witnessing finite smooth algebraic frontier stratification (Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves).
Under AC the -sheaves carry functorial injective resolutions, and with the dependent choice supplied by AC the bounded-below injective complexes with bounded cohomology model the bounded derived category, so Hom groups are computed by these replacements (Analytic field sheaves have injective derived models).
For an open inclusion with closed complement and inclusion , every sheaf of abelian groups on fits into a short exact sequence (Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence).
A sheaf of abelian groups on whose stalks vanish off a closed subset is canonically the pushforward of its restriction to (A sheaf with no stalks off a closed subset is a pushforward).
Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on sheaves of abelian groups (Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves).
The mapping cone of a chain map has degree- term with differential (The mapping cone of a chain map).
The derived category is triangulated with cone triangles, and every distinguished triangle gives a long exact cohomology sequence; rotating a triangle gives a distinguished triangle (The derived category inherits a triangulated structure).
The axiom of choice is used through the injective models of [F2] and in the degreewise splitting of a bounded complex of possibly infinite-dimensional vector spaces in step 1.1; the line computation itself is finite and explicit (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
A sheaf on the point is its vector space of sections, and the point's unique stratification makes constructibility exactly finite-dimensional cohomology by [F1]. For a bounded complex , choose complements and using AC. The differential identifies with , so is the direct sum of the zero-differential complex and a contractible complex of pairs . If all cohomology is finite-dimensional, is a bounded finite-dimensional representative, including the acyclic case where it is zero. Every vector space is injective under AC, because extending a basis splits every vector-space inclusion and extends every linear map from its subspace. Bounded complexes of vector spaces thus compute derived morphisms as homotopy classes by [F2], in both the finite-dimensional and full vector-space categories. For two finite-dimensional complexes these chain maps and homotopies are identical in both categories, proving full faithfulness as well as essential surjectivity. Hence .
On the point inverse and direct image of the identity are exact identity functors, and every section has compact support, so the proper-support functor is also the exact identity. Their derived functors are therefore identities. In the exceptional candidate of Derived operations on analytic field sheaves ↗, the fibre opens are only the point and the empty set; compact sections are exact, giving dimension bound , and the constant sheaf is itself -soft, so take . For a bounded finite-dimensional complex every term is injective over , and the candidate has sections on the point and zero on the empty set. Thus is the identity with its ordinary evaluation adjunction, and . The ordinary-operations lemma Derived tensor–Hom and inverse/direct image for field sheaves ↗ identifies tensor and internal Hom with the finite signed complexes: , with , and , with . Their terms and amplitudes are finite, so they belong to the category identified in step 1.1. Here and in the Example denote their derived operations, which coincide with their exact underived functors in this case.
Apply [F3] to the constant sheaf on , with and : the restriction is the constant sheaf , the restriction to the closed point is , and the sequence reads , the terms being computed by [F5] for the extension by zero. Stalkwise the middle sheaf is exact: at the stalk of is and the stalk of is , while at the first stalk is and the last is ; the quotient of by has no stalks off , and by [F4] it is canonically the pushforward of its restriction to the closed point. All maps are -linear, since they are obtained from the canonical adjunction units of [F5] applied to -sheaves.
In cochain grading, the cone of the map has , and differential , by reindexing [F6]. Put . The chain map given by the kernel inclusion in degree is a quasi-isomorphism: step 2.2 gives , , and induces the identity on the only possible nonzero cohomology. The cone triangle is distinguished by [F7]. Its signed inverse rotation and the quasi-isomorphism give the distinguished triangle with the kernel inclusion as first arrow: the inverse rotation negates the projection , cancelling the sign of . All three sheaves restrict to constant finite-rank sheaves (including rank zero) on each stratum of , so this localization triangle lies in .
Remarks
-
The point computation specializes the actual later-page operation interfaces to and . The line computation uses the published extension-by-zero sequence, mapping-cone convention and triangulated structure.
-
The example deliberately makes no claim that the four operations of the later formalism exist for arbitrary maps here; it computes only the identity map of the point and the two inclusions of the line, where the triangle is the localization triangle.
Depends on
- Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves
- Analytic field sheaves have injective derived models
- Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves
- Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence
- A sheaf with no stalks off a closed subset is a pushforward
- The derived category inherits a triangulated structure
- The mapping cone of a chain map
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Goresky, Lecture Notes on Sheaves and Perverse Sheaves, version of June 26, 2026 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Joseph Bernstein and Valery Lunts, Equivariant Sheaves and Functors, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1578, Part I (Derived category D(X) and functors) (standard reference, not scraped)