Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Analytic Constructible Sheaf Foundations Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page works the two smallest instances of the constructible calculus introduced on analytic-constructible-sheaf-foundations: the point, where the constructible category is the bounded derived category of finite-dimensional vector spaces and the identity map realizes all six operations as the identity, tensor, Hom and the dualizing object k in degree zero; and the open closed pair j:C∗↪C, i:{0}↪C, where the extension-by-zero sequence 0→j!kC∗→kC→i∗k→0 produces the ordinary localization triangle of the constructible derived category. The point-operation clauses rest on the declared later interfaces of analytic-derived-six-operations-and-duality; the line computation is closed locally from published extension-by-zero and mapping-cone material, and the item carries that forward obligation openly rather than assuming it.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adapted↗ rests on later materialOpen item page →

Point operations and the open closed constructible line

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and let k be a field. (1) The constructible category of a point is the bounded derived category of finite-dimensional k-vector spaces, Dcb(pt⁡;k)≃Db(k-Vectfd) (Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves). For the identity map of the point, all four pullback/pushforward operations f∗,f∗,f!,f! are the identity functors of that category, the tensor product and internal Hom are the usual finite cochain constructions, and the dualizing object is k concentrated in degree 0 (Derived tensor–Hom and inverse/direct image for field sheaves ↗, Derived operations on analytic field sheaves ↗). (2) On the complex line with the open inclusion j:C∗↪C and the closed inclusion i:{0}↪C, there is a k-linear short exact sequence of sheaves 0→j!kC∗→kC→i∗k→0, and its associated exact triangle is the ordinary localization triangle of the constructible derived category.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a field k, the point pt⁡ with its unique stratification, and the complex line with j:C∗↪C and i:{0}↪C. The point-operation clauses use the actual ordinary-operations lemma and the exceptional-candidate Definition named by the two later-page forward references.

[F1]

Dcb(X;k) is the full subcategory of Db(Sh⁡k(X)) of complexes with bounded, algebraically constructible cohomology, constructibility being local constancy of finite rank on the strata of a witnessing finite smooth algebraic frontier stratification (Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves).

[F2]

Under AC the k-sheaves carry functorial injective resolutions, and with the dependent choice supplied by AC the bounded-below injective complexes with bounded cohomology model the bounded derived category, so Hom groups are computed by these replacements (Analytic field sheaves have injective derived models).

[F3]

For an open inclusion j:U↪X with closed complement Z and inclusion i:Z↪X, every sheaf of abelian groups F on X fits into a short exact sequence 0→j!(F∣U)→F→i∗(F∣Z)→0 (Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence).

[F4]

A sheaf of abelian groups on X whose stalks vanish off a closed subset Z is canonically the pushforward of its restriction to Z (A sheaf with no stalks off a closed subset is a pushforward).

[F5]

Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on sheaves of abelian groups (Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves).

[F6]

The mapping cone of a chain map f:C∙→D∙ has degree-n term Cone⁡(f)n=Dn⊕Cn−1 with differential dn(y,x)=(dnD(y)+fn−1(x),−dn−1C(x)) (The mapping cone of a chain map).

[F7]

The derived category is triangulated with cone triangles, and every distinguished triangle gives a long exact cohomology sequence; rotating a triangle gives a distinguished triangle (The derived category inherits a triangulated structure).

[A1]

The axiom of choice is used through the injective models of [F2] and in the degreewise splitting of a bounded complex of possibly infinite-dimensional vector spaces in step 1.1; the line computation itself is finite and explicit (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2A1algebra

A sheaf on the point is its vector space of sections, and the point's unique stratification makes constructibility exactly finite-dimensional cohomology by [F1]. For a bounded complex V, choose complements Zn(V)=Bn(V)⊕Hn and Vn=Zn(V)⊕Ln using AC. The differential identifies Ln with Bn+1(V), so V is the direct sum of the zero-differential complex (Hn) and a contractible complex of pairs Ln→∼Bn+1(V). If all cohomology is finite-dimensional, (Hn) is a bounded finite-dimensional representative, including the acyclic case where it is zero. Every vector space is injective under AC, because extending a basis splits every vector-space inclusion and extends every linear map from its subspace. Bounded complexes of vector spaces thus compute derived morphisms as homotopy classes by [F2], in both the finite-dimensional and full vector-space categories. For two finite-dimensional complexes these chain maps and homotopies are identical in both categories, proving full faithfulness as well as essential surjectivity. Hence Dcb(pt⁡;k)≃Db(k-Vectfd).

2.1F1F2A1step 1.1

On the point inverse and direct image of the identity are exact identity functors, and every section has compact support, so the proper-support functor is also the exact identity. Their derived functors are therefore identities. In the exceptional candidate of Derived operations on analytic field sheaves ↗, the fibre opens are only the point and the empty set; compact sections are exact, giving dimension bound d=0, and the constant sheaf k is itself c-soft, so take K=k[0]. For a bounded finite-dimensional complex B every term is injective over k, and the candidate has sections Hom⁡k∙(k,B)=B on the point and zero on the empty set. Thus f! is the identity with its ordinary evaluation adjunction, and ωpt⁡=apt⁡!k=k[0]. The ordinary-operations lemma Derived tensor–Hom and inverse/direct image for field sheaves ↗ identifies tensor and internal Hom with the finite signed complexes: (A⊗B)n=⨁p+q=nAp⊗kBq, with d(a⊗b)=dAa⊗b+(−1)pa⊗dBb, and Homn(A,B)=∏pHom⁡k(Ap,Bp+n), with dφ=dBφ−(−1)nφdA. Their terms and amplitudes are finite, so they belong to the category identified in step 1.1. Here f∗ and f! in the Example denote their derived operations, which coincide with their exact underived functors in this case.

2.2F3F4F5step 1.1

Apply [F3] to the constant sheaf F=kC on X=C, with U=C∗ and Z={0}: the restriction kC∣C∗ is the constant sheaf kC∗, the restriction to the closed point is k, and the sequence reads 0→j!kC∗→kC→i∗k→0, the terms being computed by [F5] for the extension by zero. Stalkwise the middle sheaf is exact: at x≠0 the stalk of j!kC∗ is k and the stalk of i∗k is 0, while at 0 the first stalk is 0 and the last is k; the quotient of kC by j!kC∗ has no stalks off {0}, and by [F4] it is canonically the pushforward i∗k of its restriction to the closed point. All maps are k-linear, since they are obtained from the canonical adjunction units of [F5] applied to k-sheaves.

3.1F1F6F7step 2.2construct∎

In cochain grading, the cone C of the map g:kC→i∗k has C−1=kC, C0=i∗k and differential g, by reindexing [F6]. Put A=j!kC∗. The chain map u:A[1]→C given by the kernel inclusion in degree −1 is a quasi-isomorphism: step 2.2 gives H−1(C)=A, H0(C)=0, and u induces the identity on the only possible nonzero cohomology. The cone triangle kC→i∗k→C→kC[1] is distinguished by [F7]. Its signed inverse rotation and the quasi-isomorphism −u:A[1]→C give the distinguished triangle A→kC→i∗k→A[1] with the kernel inclusion as first arrow: the inverse rotation negates the projection C[−1]→kC, cancelling the sign of −u. All three sheaves restrict to constant finite-rank sheaves (including rank zero) on each stratum of {C∗,{0}}, so this localization triangle lies in Dcb(C;k).

Remarks

  • The point computation specializes the actual later-page operation interfaces to d=0 and K=k[0]. The line computation uses the published extension-by-zero sequence, mapping-cone convention and triangulated structure.

  • The example deliberately makes no claim that the four operations of the later formalism exist for arbitrary maps here; it computes only the identity map of the point and the two inclusions of the line, where the triangle is the localization triangle.

Sources