How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves
Definition
Let be a separated finite-type complex algebraic variety, i.e. a classical algebraic variety over (Classical algebraic prevarieties, regular maps, and varieties), regarded as a topological space with its analytic topology (Analytic topology and finite smooth algebraic stratifications of complex varieties), and let be a field. Write for the category of sheaves of -vector spaces and -linear morphisms (A sheaf on a topological space, Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules, Modules on a ringed space); it is an abelian category (Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories), so its bounded derived category is defined with the conventions of Derived category of an abelian category, under the standing smallness hypothesis recorded there.
The category is the full subcategory of consisting of the complexes satisfying:
- is cohomologically bounded: for sufficiently large; and
- is algebraically constructible: there exists a finite smooth algebraic stratification with the frontier condition of (Analytic topology and finite smooth algebraic stratifications of complex varieties) such that for every stratum and every integer the restriction is locally constant of finite rank (Locally constant sheaves of finite rank).
These are topological constructible sheaves, not coherent or quasi-coherent sheaves. We use the shift convention of Derived category of an abelian category: . A groupoid local system is identified with a locally constant sheaf only through an explicit local comparison, which is not made here.
Constructibility is a condition on the cohomology sheaves of a complex, and it is quantified existentially over finite smooth algebraic frontier stratifications: no stratification is fixed, and no existence or common-refinement theorem for stratifications is asserted by this definition. Shifting replaces by , which preserves cohomological boundedness and shifts a witnessing stratification nowhere, so the class is closed under shifts and under isomorphisms in . No choice principle is used.
Depends on
- Analytic topology and finite smooth algebraic stratifications of complex varieties
- Locally constant sheaves of finite rank
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Presheaves and sheaves of groups, rings, and modules
- Modules on a ringed space
- Sheaves of abelian groups, and likewise sheaves of modules on a ringed space, form abelian categories
- Derived category of an abelian category
Used by
- Equivariant constructible derived category of complex varieties Definition
- Point operations and the open closed constructible line Example
- Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations Lemma
- Acyclic product fibers stabilize bounded constructible pullback Hom Lemma
- Affine morphisms have one-sided perverse exactness Lemma
- Analytic field sheaves have injective derived models Lemma
- Artin vanishing on complex affine varieties Lemma
- Cartesian simplicial sheaves model actual equivariant derived Hom Lemma
- Complex stratified Morse data, constructible transport and complex links Lemma
- General linear Stiefel approximations stabilize bounded constructible Hom Lemma
- Locally split Cech nerves give actual derived Cartesian sheaf descent Lemma
- Proper surjections have cohomological descent for constructible field sheaves Lemma
- Smooth and noncharacteristic complex pullbacks are perverse-exact Lemma
- Universal hyperplanes give relative weak Lefschetz and maximal pullback subobjects Lemma
- Coherent six operations on analytic constructible field sheaves Theorem
- Constructible six functors, proper base change and normalized equivariant duality Theorem
- Constructible Verdier duality and complex orientation Theorem
- Equivariant constructible Ext is degreewise finite and compatible with characteristic zero scalars Theorem
- Logarithmic construction of smooth-open mixed Hodge structures Theorem
- Middle perverse t structure glues and has simple intersection complexes Theorem
- Proper hypercovers compute constructible derived cohomology Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mark Goresky, Lecture Notes on Sheaves and Perverse Sheaves, version of June 26, 2026 (standard reference, not scraped)