Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Geometric sequences: the complete classification for every real ratio

Example

For every real r, let ak=rk for natural k≥0, using the integer powers of Integer powers am, so a0=1 even when r=0, and ak+1=akr. This notation is valid for negative real ratios and is not rational exponentiation of a negative base. The complete classification is: if ∣r∣<1, then rk→0; if r=1, the sequence is constantly 1 and converges to 1; if r=−1, its even and odd subsequences are constantly 1 and −1, so it is bounded but divergent; if r>1, then rk→+∞; if r<−1, then ∣rk∣→+∞, while the even subsequence diverges to +∞ and the odd subsequence to −∞, and the whole sequence neither converges nor diverges to either signed infinity. Consequently (rk) converges exactly when −1<r≤1. Here signed-infinity assertions mean Divergence to +∞ and to −∞, not a finite limit value. Quantitative checks: if 0<∣r∣<1 and h=∣r∣−1−1>0, then ∣rk∣≤(1+kh)−1 for every natural k, and for k≥1 one has ∣rk∣<(kh)−1; if ∣r∣>1 and d=∣r∣−1>0, then ∣rk∣≥1+kd. The weak Bernoulli estimates have equality for k=0,1 and are strict for k≥2. Thus (1/2)k and (−1/2)k are both null, 2k diverges positively, and (−2)k grows in absolute value while alternating sign.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real r, the sequence ak:=rk with integer powers (Integer powers am, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences), the alternating sequence (sk) with s0=1, sσ(k)=−sk and its index map n with n0=0, nσ(j)=σ(σ(nj)) (FALSE: every bounded sequence converges), and mj:=σ(nj).

[F1]

Integer powers: a0=1 and aj+1=aja for every real a and every natural j (Integer powers am).

[F2]

Power laws: ai+j=aiaj, (ai)j=aij and (ab)j=ajbj for all naturals i,j; and if a≠0 then aj≠0 for every j (Laws of integer exponents).

[F3]

Signs of powers: if a≥0 then aj≥0, and if a>0 then aj>0 (Monotonicity of x↦xn and of n↦an).

[F4]

Bernoulli's inequality: for x≥−1 and every natural j, (1+x)j≥1+jx, with equality if and only if j≤1 or x=0 (Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n≥1+nx).

[F5]

Archimedean property: for every real x there is a natural number j≥1 with x<j⋅1R (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

[F6]

Inverses of positives: a>0 implies a−1>0; and 0<a<b implies 0<b−1<a−1 (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[F7]

Canonical naturals: n↦n⋅1R is strictly increasing, hence preserves non-strict order, on {1,2,3,… } (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[F8]

0<1 and 1≠0 (The multiplicative identity is positive).

[F9]

Absolute value: ∣uv∣=∣u∣ ∣v∣, ∣−u∣=∣u∣, ∣u∣≥0, ∣u∣=0 if and only if u=0, and ∣u∣=u for u≥0 (Basic properties of the absolute value, Absolute value in an ordered field).

[F10]

A product with a zero factor vanishes: 0⋅a=0 (Multiplication by zero: 0⋅a=0).

[F11]

The alternating sequence: (sk) is the unique sequence with s0=1 and sσ(k)=−sk (FALSE: every bounded sequence converges).

[F25]

The index map n of the same item satisfies n0=0, nσ(j)=σ(σ(nj)), is strictly increasing, and has snj=1 for every j (FALSE: every bounded sequence converges).

[F12]

Growth of index maps: if p is strictly increasing then pj≥j for every j (A strictly increasing index map satisfies nk≥k).

[F13]

Consecutive comparisons suffice: if pi<pσ(i) for every i then p is strictly increasing (A strictly increasing index map satisfies nk≥k).

[F14]

Discreteness: for naturals a,b, a<b  ⟺  σ(a)≤b (Discreteness: σ(n) is the immediate successor).

[F15]

Subsequences inherit limits, and the divergence test: if a sequence converges to x and p is strictly increasing, then the subsequence along p converges to x; consequently, if two subsequences converge to different limits the sequence does not converge (Subsequences inherit the limit).

[F16]

Every convergent sequence is bounded (Every convergent sequence is bounded).

[F17]

Divergence to +∞ and to −∞ means, respectively, that for every real M one has xk>M eventually and xk<M eventually (Divergence to +∞ and to −∞).

[F18]

Trichotomy, and u≤v<w implies u<w (Ordered field).

[F19]

Scaling a strict inequality by a positive factor: if c>0 then a<b  ⟺  ac<bc (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication).

[F20]

Convergence: (zk) converges to z when for every rational ε>0 there is K with ∣zk−z∣<ε for all k≥K (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

[F21]

Field arithmetic: multiplication is associative and commutative, it distributes over addition, and every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse (Field).

[F22]

Adding a constant preserves the strict order: a<b implies a+c<b+c (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities).

[F23]

Induction principle: if a property P satisfies P(0) and P(n)⇒P(σ(n)) for all n, then P(n) holds for all n∈N (The principle of mathematical induction).

[F24]

Boundedness: (zk) is bounded when there is a real M with ∣zk∣≤M for every k∈N; it is unbounded otherwise (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).

Verification

technique · cases
1.1baseihdischarge-inductiongivenF1F8F9F23

Absolute values of powers: for every real r and every k one has ∣rk∣=∣r∣k, by induction. The base case is ∣r0∣=∣1∣=1=∣r∣0 by [F1], [F8] and [F9]; and assuming ∣rk∣=∣r∣k for a fixed k, the recursion [F1] and multiplicativity [F9] give ∣rσ(k)∣=∣rkr∣=∣rk∣ ∣r∣=∣r∣k∣r∣=∣r∣σ(k). Hence by the induction principle [F23] the identity holds for every k; in particular ∣(−b)k∣=∣−b∣k=bk for every real b≥0 and every k.

1.2givenF4F5F6F7F9F17F19algebra

Growth for bases above 1: let b>1 be real and put d:=b−1>0. Bernoulli [F4] gives bk=(1+d)k≥1+kd for every k, with equality exactly when k≤1, since d≠0. Given any real M, apply [F5] to the real 1+∣M/d∣ to get a natural N≥1 with N>1+∣M/d∣; then Nd>d+∣M∣≥∣M∣, so for every k≥N the order preservation [F7] and scaling by d>0 [F19] give kd≥Nd>∣M∣≥M, hence bk≥1+kd>M. Therefore bk→+∞ in the sense of [F17].

1.3assume-case zerogivenF1F9F10F20

The case r=0: here r0=1 by [F1], and rk=0 for every k≥1 by induction, since rσ(k)=rkr and a product with a zero factor vanishes [F10]. Given a rational ε>0, for every k≥1 we have ∣rk−0∣=∣0∣=0<ε by [F9], so rk→0 by [F20] with threshold K=1.

1.4F9F20

Constant sequences converge to their values: for every real c, given a rational ε>0 one has ∣c−c∣=∣0∣=0<ε at every index by [F9], so the threshold K=0 witnesses [F20].

1.5baseihdischarge-inductiongivenF1F2F9F11F21F23

Alternating powers: for every positive real b and every k, (−b)k=skbk by induction: the base case is (−b)0=1=s0b0, and if (−b)k=skbk then (−b)σ(k)=(−b)k(−b)=skbk(−b)=(−sk)bkb=sσ(k)bσ(k) by [F1], [F2], [F11] and field arithmetic [F21]. Alongside, ∣sk∣=1 for every k by induction: ∣s0∣=∣1∣=1, and ∣sσ(k)∣=∣−sk∣=∣sk∣=1 by [F9] and [F11].

1.6givenF11F12F13F14F25

The index maps: n is strictly increasing with n0=0 and snj=1 [F25], so nj≥j [F12]; the map mj=σ(nj) is strictly increasing, because nj<nσ(j) gives mj=σ(nj)≤nσ(j)<σ(nσ(j))=mσ(j) by [F14] and [F13], and then mj≥j by [F12]; moreover smj=sσ(nj)=−snj=−1 by [F11].

2.1assume-case smallstep 1.1givenF2F3F4F5F6F7F9F19F20F21algebra

The case 0<∣r∣<1: put b:=∣r∣∈(0,1) and h:=b−1−1>0, positive by [F6]. Bernoulli [F4] applied to h≥−1 gives (b−1)k=(1+h)k≥1+kh for every k, with equality exactly when k≤1; since bk(b−1)k=(bb−1)k=1k=1 by [F2], uniqueness of inverses [F21] gives bk=((b−1)k)−1≤(1+kh)−1 by the reciprocal reversal [F6], both sides positive by [F3]; for k≥1 also 1+kh>kh>0, so (1+kh)−1<(kh)−1 and ∣rk∣=bk<(kh)−1 by step 1.1. Now let a rational ε>0 be given; [F5] applied to 1/(hε) supplies a natural N≥1 with N>1/(hε), so (Nh)−1<ε; for every k≥N the order preservation [F7] and scaling by h>0 [F19] give kh≥Nh, hence (kh)−1≤(Nh)−1<ε by [F6], and therefore ∣rk−0∣=∣rk∣<ε by [F9]. So rk→0.

2.2assume-case unitstep 1.4givenF1

The case r=1: then rk=1 for every k, by induction from 10=1 and 1σ(k)=1k⋅1=1 by [F1]; hence rk→1 by step 1.4.

2.3assume-case negunitstep 1.1step 1.4step 1.5step 1.6givenF8F15F17F18F22F24

The case r=−1: by step 1.5 with b=1 one has rk=(−1)k=sk for every k. The even subsequence along n is constantly 1 and the odd subsequence along m is constantly −1: rnj=snj=1 and rmj=smj=−1 by step 1.6, and both index maps are strictly increasing by step 1.6, so these are subsequences in the sense of [F15] converging to 1 and to −1 respectively. The limits differ: −1<1 since 0<1 by [F8] and adding −1 preserves the order by [F22], so 1≠−1 by [F18], and the divergence test [F15] shows that (rk) does not converge. It is bounded in the sense of [F24], since ∣rk∣=∣r∣k=1 for every k by step 1.1, and it diverges to neither signed infinity: at the bound M=1 the condition xk>1 of [F17] fails at every index, and at M=−1 the condition xk<−1 fails at every index.

2.4assume-case bigstep 1.2givenF3F16F17F24

The case r>1: with b:=r>1, step 1.2 gives bk→+∞, and rk=bk for every k; hence rk→+∞ in the sense of [F17]. Since the terms are positive and eventually exceed every real bound, the sequence is unbounded and cannot converge by [F16].

2.5assume-case negbigstep 1.1step 1.2step 1.5step 1.6givenF9F16F17F24

The case r<−1: put b:=∣r∣>1. By step 1.5, rk=skbk for every k, so ∣rk∣=∣sk∣bk=bk→+∞ by step 1.1, step 1.2 and [F9]; since bk exceeds every real eventually, no real M satisfies ∣rk∣≤M for all k, so (rk) is unbounded in the sense of [F24] and therefore not convergent by [F16]. Along the even index map, rnj=snjbnj=bnj by step 1.6: given a real M, step 1.2 gives K with bk>M for all k≥K, while nj≥j≥K for j≥K by step 1.6, so rnj=bnj>M for all j≥K, which is divergence of that subsequence to +∞ by [F17]. Along the odd index map, rmj=smjbmj=−bmj by step 1.6: given a real M, step 1.2 supplies K such that bk>−M for k≥K, and mj≥j≥K for j≥K by step 1.6; hence bmj>−M, so −bmj<M for every j≥K, so the odd subsequence diverges to −∞ by [F17]. Finally the whole sequence fails both signed-infinity tests at M=0: the condition xk>0 eventually fails because rmj=−bmj<0 at the arbitrarily large indices mj≥j, and the condition xk<0 eventually fails because rnj=bnj>0 at the arbitrarily large indices nj≥j; so it neither converges nor diverges to either signed infinity.

3.1cases-exhaustivestep 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 2.4step 2.5givenF18∎

The cases are exhaustive: by trichotomy [F18] every real r satisfies exactly one of r<−1, r=−1, −1<r<1, r=1, r>1, and these have been disposed of in steps 2.5, 2.3, 2.1 and 1.3 (for −1<r<1, splitting at r=0), 2.2 and 2.4 respectively. So (rk) converges exactly when −1<r≤1: to 0 for −1<r<1 by steps 1.3 and 2.1, and to 1 for r=1 by step 2.2, while it diverges for r=−1, for r>1 and for r<−1. The quantitative bounds are those derived in steps 1.2 and 2.1 — ∣rk∣≤(1+kh)−1 and ∣rk∣<(kh)−1 for k≥1 when 0<∣r∣<1, and ∣rk∣≥1+kd when ∣r∣>1 — and the displayed numerical instances (1/2)k, (−1/2)k (null), 2k (diverging to +∞) and (−2)k (absolute values diverging, signs alternating) are the substitutions r=±1/2 and r=±2 into the proved clauses.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources