Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized Hermite Fourier eigenfunctions

Statement

Assume countable choice. On R set h0(x)=21/4e−πx2,a†=πx−12πddx,hm=(m!)−1/2(a†)mh0. Then (hm)m≥0 is an orthonormal basis of complex L2(R), each hm is Schwartz, and h^m=(−i)mhm. Basis means every f∈L2 has the norm-convergent expansion f=∑m≥0⟨f,hm⟩hm, with the pairing linear in its first variable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), the Schwartz definition Schwartz space and its seminorms, and the everywhere-convergent exponential series The complex exponential by its power series.

[F1]

Polynomial Gaussians are Schwartz (Polynomial Gaussians are Schwartz).

[F2]

The Gaussian transform and integral have the stated 2π normalization (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).

[F3]

Fourier interchanges differentiation and polynomial multiplication with their 2π factors (Fourier transform acts continuously on Schwartz space).

[F4]

Complex integration by parts holds on decaying lines (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines).

[F5]

Complex L2 is complete, with Cauchy–Schwarz and the first-variable-linear pairing (Complex completeness, density, and inner product: the consumer interface).

[F6]

An integrable function with zero transform vanishes a.e. (Uniqueness of the L1 Fourier transform).

[F7]

Dominated convergence passes limits through integrals (Dominated convergence).

[F8]

Plancherel identifies the resulting eigenfunction identities also in L2 (Plancherel theorem).

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

Put a=πx+(2π)−1d/dx and um=(a†)mh0. Differentiation gives ah0=0 and aa†−a†a=I, since (d/dx)(xf)−xf′=f. Induction gives aum=mum−1 for m≥1, and a†aum=mum for m≥0. If um=Qmh0, then Qm+1=2πxQm−(2π)−1Qm′. Thus Qm is real of degree m with leading coefficient (2π)m, and [F1] makes every um Schwartz.

2.1step 1.1F2F4F5

For polynomial Gaussians v,w, [F4] gives ⟨a†v,w⟩=⟨v,aw⟩: derivative products are polynomial Gaussians and integrable, and their endpoint products vanish. Consequently N=a†a is symmetric on these functions, since ⟨Nv,w⟩=⟨av,aw⟩=⟨v,Nw⟩. Step 1.1 implies (m−l)⟨um,ul⟩=0. Also ∥um∥22=⟨a†um−1,um⟩=m∥um−1∥22. The base norm is ∥h0∥22=2∫e−2πx2 dx=1 by [F2]. Hence ∥um∥22=m! and the normalized functions are orthonormal, including m=0.

2.2step 1.1F2F3F8

The derivative identities [F3] give F(a†v)=(i/(2π))(v^)′−iπξv^=−ia†v^. Since [F2] gives h^0=h0, induction yields u^m=(−i)mum and the asserted normalized identity. All operations are on Schwartz functions, so this also holds for their Plancherel classes.

2.3step 1.1F5F6F7given

Suppose f∈L2 is orthogonal to all hm. By the nonzero real leading coefficients in step 1.1, triangular induction expresses each monomial xr as a real linear combination of Q0,…,Qr. Therefore ∫f(x)h0(x)xr dx=0 for every r; these integrals exist by [F5], since xrh0∈L2. Put v=fh0∈L1 by [F5]. For fixed real ξ, the exponential Taylor partial sums are bounded by e2π∣ξ∣∣x∣. The majorant ∣f∣h0e2π∣ξ∣∣x∣ is integrable by [F5]: its second factor has finite square integral, because −2πx2+4π∣ξ∣∣x∣≤−πx2+4πξ2. Thus [F7] integrates the exponential series termwise, all terms being the zero moments. It gives v^(ξ)=0 for every ξ. By [F6], v=0 a.e.; positivity of h0 gives f=0 a.e.

3.1step 2.1step 2.3F5∎

For arbitrary f∈L2, put sN=∑m=0N⟨f,hm⟩hm. Finite orthogonality in step 2.1 gives ∥f−sN∥22=∥f∥22−∑m=0N∣⟨f,hm⟩∣2≥0. Hence the coefficient-square partial sums are bounded increasing and converge; their tails give ∥sM−sN∥22→0. Completeness in [F5] supplies s∈L2 with sN→s. Pairing continuity shows ⟨f−s,hm⟩=0 for every m, so step 2.3 gives f=s. This proves the promised expansion, not merely orthogonality. All sequences are specified; countable choice is inherited from the complex integral and completeness interfaces.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

62 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources