Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The intersection pairing on the projective plane

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited through the Euler-characteristic and cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let k be a field and let X=Pk2 with its twisting sheaves O(d) (Twisting sheaf on Proj, Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings). Then O(d)⋅O(e)=defor all d,e∈Z. Consequently the class l:=O(1) of a line satisfies l⋅l=1, and for nonzero homogeneous forms f,g of degrees d,e≥1 with zero schemes C=Z(f), D=Z(g) and O(C)≅O(d), O(D)≅O(e) (effective Cartier divisors) one has C⋅D=de; in particular a line has l⋅l=1, a smooth conic C has C⋅C=4, and a line and a smooth conic meet with l⋅C=2=deg⁡l(O(2)∣l). All values lie in Z and agree with the restriction-degree theorem Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a field k, the projective plane X=Pk2 with twisting sheaves O(d), a line l, and nonzero homogeneous forms f,g of degrees d,e≥1 with zero schemes C=Z(f), D=Z(g).

[F1]

Pk2 is an integral regular projective surface over k of pure dimension two: its affine charts are spectra of polynomial domains in two variables over k, whose local rings are regular and whose dimension is two (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings, Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree), and the irreducible charts form a pairwise intersecting open cover (Relative projective space from standard charts, Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Integral schemes, Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface). Its twisting sheaves are invertible and satisfy O(m)⊗O(n)≅O(m+n) and O(−d)≅O(d)∨ (Invertible twists for degree-one generated rings, Dual of a line bundle is its tensor inverse).

[F2]

Cohomology of twists: on Pk2 the cohomology of O(m) vanishes except in degrees 0 and 2, with H0≅k[x0,x1,x2]m for m≥0 (dimension (m+22)), H0=0 for m<0, and H2 described by the negative Laurent monomials, nonzero exactly for m≤−3 with dimension (−m−12) (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space, Relative projective space from standard charts). Consequently the Euler characteristic of Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf satisfies χ(X,O(m))=(m+22)=(m+2)(m+1)2for every m∈Z.

[F3]

Regular sections and divisors: on the integral scheme X a nonzero global section of an invertible sheaf is regular, so its zero scheme is an effective Cartier divisor Z(s) with OX(Z(s))≅L (A regular global section of an invertible sheaf glues to an effective Cartier divisor, Zero scheme of a line-bundle section, Effective cartier divisor, Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor). For the nonzero form f of degree d≥1 the section f∈Γ(X,O(d)) is nonzero and its zero scheme is C; likewise for g.

[F4]

The restriction-degree theorem (Intersection with a curve is the degree of the restriction): for effective Cartier divisors C,D on the surface X one has C⋅D=deg⁡C(O(D)∣C), where deg⁡C is the Euler-characteristic degree of Degree of an invertible sheaf on a proper one-dimensional scheme. For the line l=Z(x0)⊆X, which by [F3] is an effective Cartier divisor with associated line bundle OX(l)≅O(1), with closed immersion j:l↪X, twisting the exact sequence of Twisting the exact sequence of an effective Cartier divisor gives 0→O(m−1)→O(m)→j∗(O(m)∣l)→0 for every m∈Z; additivity of χ on short exact sequences of coherent modules (Euler characteristic is additive in short exact sequences) and the closed-immersion projection formula χ(X,j∗F)=χ(l,F) for coherent F on l (Projection formula for a closed immersion and an invertible sheaf) therefore give χ(l,O(m)∣l)=χ(X,O(m))−χ(X,O(m−1))=m+1 by [F2], in particular deg⁡l(O(2)∣l)=3−1=2.

[F5]

The intersection product on the integral regular projective surface X is the symmetric Z-bilinear pairing of The surface intersection product is symmetric and bilinear, defined by the alternating sum of Intersection numbers of Cartier divisors on a smooth projective surface.

[F6]

The Axiom of Choice enters through the cohomology and Euler-characteristic suppliers of [F2] and the curve-degree supplier of [F4]; no selection is made below.

Verification

Given: a field k, the plane X=Pk2, integers d,e, and nonzero forms f,g of degrees d,e≥1 with zero schemes C,D.

1.1F2

The Euler characteristic of twists. By [F2] only the degrees q=0 and q=2 contribute to χ(X,O(m))=∑q(−1)qdim⁡kHq(X,O(m)); for m≥0 one gets (m+22), for −2≤m≤−1 all groups vanish and hence χ=0, and for m≤−3 the term (−1)2(−m−12) equals (m+22) by the identity (−m−12)=(m+22) for those m. In all cases χ(X,O(m))=(m+22).

1.2F1F3

Forms cut out effective divisors. The forms f and g are nonzero global sections of the invertible sheaves O(d) and O(e); since X is integral, they are regular sections, so their zero schemes C=Z(f) and D=Z(g) are effective Cartier divisors with O(C)≅O(d) and O(D)≅O(e).

2.1F1F5step 1.1

The pairing of twists. By definition and [F1], O(d)⋅O(e)=χ(X,OX)−χ(X,O(−d))−χ(X,O(−e))+χ(X,O(−d−e)). Substituting χ(X,O(m))=(m+22) from step 1.1, this is (2)(1)2−(2−d)(1−d)2−(2−e)(1−e)2+(2−d−e)(1−d−e)2, and expanding, the numerator is [2−(d2−3d+2)]−[(e2−3e+2)−((d+e)2−3(d+e)+2)]=d(3−d)−d(3−d−2e)=2de, so O(d)⋅O(e)=de. In particular l⋅l=O(1)⋅O(1)=1.

3.1F1F5step 1.2step 2.1

The divisor computation. By the definition of the pairing, C⋅D=O(C)⋅O(D) for the effective Cartier divisors of step 1.2, and by [F1] the classes of O(C) and O(D) are those of O(d) and O(e); hence C⋅D=de by step 2.1.

4.1F4step 2.1step 3.1

Specialisations and the independent cross-check. Taking d=e=1 and f linear gives l⋅l=1; taking d=e=2 and g a nonzero quadratic form gives C⋅C=4, in particular for a smooth conic. For the line l=Z(x0) and a conic C=Z(g) of degree two, step 3.1 gives l⋅C=2, and independently the restriction-degree theorem [F4] applied to the effective divisors l and C gives l⋅C=deg⁡l(O(2)∣l)=2, since the twisting sequences of [F4] give χ(l,O(2)∣l)=χ(X,O(2))−χ(X,O(1))=6−3=3 and χ(l,Ol)=χ(X,O)−χ(X,O(−1))=1−0=1. Both computations agree, as asserted.

5.1F6step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Conclusion and choice accounting. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 give O(d)⋅O(e)=de and C⋅D=de, and step 4.1 records the line, conic and restriction-degree specialisations. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the cohomology and Euler-characteristic suppliers recorded in [F6]; the form f, the form g and the line are given data, and steps 1.1–4.1 make no selection.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

152 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources