How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Worked case: the figure-eight complement
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be the standard figure-eight knot and its compact exterior. Its interior admits a complete finite-volume hyperbolic metric obtained by gluing two regular ideal tetrahedra; each edge class has total angle , both generators of the peripheral torus have trivial rotation-and-scale cusp multiplier, and its complete hyperbolic volume is .
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the standard figure-eight knot exterior.
The standard two-tetrahedron figure-eight gluing is complete constructs the complete finite-volume metric from the specified two-tetrahedron face gluing and verifies both edge classes and a basis of cusp multipliers.
Volume of the regular ideal tetrahedron gives the volume of each regular ideal tetrahedron as .
Mostow–Prasad rigidity and knot volume proves uniqueness and volume preservation for complete finite-volume hyperbolic metrics on this knot exterior.
Lobachevsky Fourier expansion and a certified π/3 value gives the positive series for and bounds the tail after the first terms by .
Verification
Given: The explicit complete metric in [F1], built from two regular ideal tetrahedra.
The two tetrahedra have disjoint interiors in the face-glued triangulation, and their common faces have three-dimensional volume zero. Additivity of the Riemannian volume integral and [F2] therefore give total volume .
For and , let and . Exact integer division gives . Also , as verified by squaring both integer endpoints against . The truncated volume is , because [F3] gives times that series. The preceding integer bounds and give . Exact cross-multiplication places between and . Its omitted positive tail is less than because . Thus the complete interval lies strictly between and , giving the stated five-decimal rounding.
Steps 1.1–2.1 compute the volume of the explicit complete gluing metric. For any other complete finite-volume hyperbolic metric on the same exterior interior, the identity fundamental-group isomorphism satisfies [F4], which supplies a volume-preserving isometry. Therefore the computed value is independent of the chosen complete hyperbolic metric and is the asserted complete hyperbolic volume of the figure-eight complement.
Remarks
The metric-independent identification is proved in step 3.1 using the full local finite-volume rigidity theorem. The rounded value follows from the exact integer bounds in step 2.1.
Depends on
- Knot exterior
- Finite-volume hyperbolic knot exterior
- The standard two-tetrahedron figure-eight gluing is complete
- Volume of the regular ideal tetrahedron
- Lobachevsky Fourier expansion and a certified π/3 value
- Mostow–Prasad rigidity and knot volume
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jessica S. Purcell, Hyperbolic Knot Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- William P. Thurston, The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)