Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 1 also cleared it.

Hyperbolic knot complements and volume — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The trefoil exterior is Seifert-fibered

Statement refuted

Every compact exterior of a smooth knot in S3 is non-Seifert-fibered.

Counterexample description

Let S3={(z,w)∈C2:∣z∣2+∣w∣2=1} with the weighted circle action gθ(z,w)=(e3iθz,e2iθw), and let K(t)=2−1/2(e3it,e2it) for t∈R/(2πZ). The Clifford torus ∣z∣=∣w∣=2−1/2 separates S3 into two solid tori; K winds twice around the core of ∣z∣≤∣w∣ and three times around the core of ∣w∣≤∣z∣, so it is the standard (3,2) torus knot, the trefoil. Let q:S3→S3/S1 be the orbit map and choose a small closed disk D about q(K) disjoint from the axis orbits. Then N(K)=q−1(D) is an invariant solid torus neighborhood and EK=S3∖int⁡N(K) is Seifert-fibered over a disk with cone points of orders 2 and 3; a regular fiber is central in π1(EK).

Diagram

The disk marks the regular orbit removed to form the exterior. The two filled points mark the axis orbits, with their stabilizer orders. The proof uses the explicit circle action and does not depend on the drawing.

\begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.15] \draw[thick] (0,0) circle (1.6); \fill[gray!15] (0.45,0.15) circle (0.33); \draw[thick] (0.45,0.15) circle (0.33); \fill (0,1.6) circle (2pt); \fill (0,-1.6) circle (2pt); \node at (0.45,0.15) {q(K)}; \node[right] at (0,1.6) {order 3}; \node[right] at (0,-1.6) {order 2}; \node at (0,-2.0) {quotient sphere; remove the shaded disk}; \end{tikzpicture} \end{center}

Facts & Assumptions

Given: S3={(z,w)∈C2:∣z∣2+∣w∣2=1}, the weighted circle action gθ(z,w)=(e3iθz,e2iθw), its orbit K(t)=2−1/2(e3it,e2it), the orbit map q:S3→S3/S1, a small closed disk D around q(K) disjoint from the two axis orbits, and the invariant tube N(K)=q−1(D) with exterior EK=S3∖int⁡N(K).

[F1]

Knot exterior defines the compact exterior by removing the interior of the chosen closed tube.

[F2]

Incompressibility, Seifert fibrations, and JSJ systems defines a Seifert fibration by local fibered-solid-torus models; multiplicity 1 fibers are regular, while multiplicity q>1 fibers are exceptional of order q.

[F3]

Thurston hyperbolization for atoroidal knot exteriors explicitly requires that the exterior not be Seifert-fibered.

Counterexample

1.1givenalgebraconstruct

The action preserves ∣z∣2+∣w∣2, so it acts smoothly on S3. The orbit of (2−1/2,2−1/2) is exactly K. A group element stabilizes this point only if 3θ and 2θ are both multiples of 2π; coprimality of 2 and 3 makes the stabilizer trivial. The regions ∣z∣≤∣w∣ and ∣w∣≤∣z∣ are solid tori, parametrized respectively by (z,w)=(z,1−∣z∣2η) and (z,w)=(1−∣w∣2η,w) with the disk coordinate bounded by 2−1/2 and η∈S1. The w coordinate is the core direction of the first solid torus and winds twice along K; the z coordinate is the core direction of the second and winds three times. This proves the claimed (3,2) torus-knot type. On the axis z=0 the stabilizer has order 2, and on the axis w=0 it has order 3.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1construct

On zw≠0, write α=arg⁡z and β=arg⁡w modulo 2π. The integer coordinate change θ=α−β, ϕ=2α−3β has determinant −1 and is invertible on the phase torus. The circle action changes θ by its parameter and fixes ϕ, while r=∣z∣∈(0,1) is fixed; thus the quotient of this open set is the cylinder with coordinates (r,ϕ), and the inverse image of any disk D around q(K) in it is explicitly Sθ1×D. At r=0 and r=1 the phase circle collapses to one point at each end, so the full orbit space is a sphere; the two axis orbits have stabilizer orders 2 and 3. The complement of D is a disk with those two cone points. Its orbits give the fibers of EK, and [F2] identifies the axis fibers as exceptional of orders 2 and 3.

3.1givenstep 2.1construct

Choose a basepoint x on a regular fiber, let h be that fiber loop, and let γ be any loop in EK based at x. The map F:[0,1]2→EK defined by F(s,t)=g2πs(γ(t)) is well-defined because the tube is invariant. Its boundary represents hγh−1γ−1: the two vertical sides are γ and γ−1 since g0=g2π=id⁡, and the horizontal sides are the fiber loop and its reverse. The square contracts its boundary, so h commutes with [γ]. Since γ was arbitrary, the regular fiber class is central in π1(EK).

4.1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

By [F3], a Seifert-fibered exterior does not satisfy the required non-Seifert-fibered hypothesis. Step 2.1 establishes that EK is Seifert-fibered, so this example refutes the statement that every knot exterior is non-Seifert-fibered and also fails that hypothesis of the hyperbolization contract.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Worked case: the figure-eight complement

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let K be the standard figure-eight knot and EK its compact exterior. Its interior admits a complete finite-volume hyperbolic metric obtained by gluing two regular ideal tetrahedra; each edge class has total angle 2π, both generators of the peripheral torus have trivial rotation-and-scale cusp multiplier, and its complete hyperbolic volume is 6Λ(π/3)=2v3≈2.02988.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the standard figure-eight knot exterior.

[F1]

The standard two-tetrahedron figure-eight gluing is complete constructs the complete finite-volume metric from the specified two-tetrahedron face gluing and verifies both edge classes and a basis of cusp multipliers.

[F2]

Volume of the regular ideal tetrahedron gives the volume of each regular ideal tetrahedron as v3=3Λ(π/3).

[F4]

Mostow–Prasad rigidity and knot volume proves uniqueness and volume preservation for complete finite-volume hyperbolic metrics on this knot exterior.

[F3]

Lobachevsky Fourier expansion and a certified π/3 value gives the positive series for Λ(π/3) and bounds the tail after the first N+1 terms by 3/(72N2).

Verification

Given: The explicit complete metric in [F1], built from two regular ideal tetrahedra.

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The two tetrahedra have disjoint interiors in the face-glued triangulation, and their common faces have three-dimensional volume zero. Additivity of the Riemannian volume integral and [F2] therefore give total volume 2v3=6Λ(π/3).

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

For N=10,000 and Q=1030, let ak=⌊Q/(3k+1)2⌋ and bk=⌊Q/(3k+2)2⌋. Exact integer division gives 781302412526189990283977435641≤∑k=0N(ak−bk−1)≤Q∑k=0N((3k+1)−2−(3k+2)−2)≤∑k=0N(ak−bk+1)=781302412526189990283977455643. Also r=1732050807568877293527446341505<Q3<r+1=1732050807568877293527446341506, as verified by squaring both integer endpoints against 3Q2. The truncated volume is VN=332∑k=0N((3k+1)−2−(3k+2)−2), because [F3] gives Λ(π/3)=34 times that series. The preceding integer bounds and r<Q3<r+1 give 3r(781302412526189990283977435641)2Q2≤VN≤3(r+1)(781302412526189990283977455643)2Q2. Exact cross-multiplication places VN between 2.02988321185 and 2.02988321187. Its omitted positive tail is less than 1.445×10−9 because 63/(72N2)=3/(12N2)<1.445×10−9. Thus the complete interval lies strictly between 2.029875 and 2.029885, giving the stated five-decimal rounding.

3.1givenF1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Steps 1.1–2.1 compute the volume of the explicit complete gluing metric. For any other complete finite-volume hyperbolic metric on the same exterior interior, the identity fundamental-group isomorphism satisfies [F4], which supplies a volume-preserving isometry. Therefore the computed value is independent of the chosen complete hyperbolic metric and is the asserted complete hyperbolic volume of the figure-eight complement.

Remarks

The metric-independent identification is proved in step 3.1 using the full local finite-volume rigidity theorem. The rounded value follows from the exact integer bounds in step 2.1.

Sources