Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A conditional three-dimensional computation with no uniqueness claim

Example

Let D=(0,1)3, f=0, and choose a nonzero χ∈Cc∞(0,1), for example a smooth bump supported in (1/4,3/4). Put ψ(x,y,z)=χ(x)χ(y)χ(z) and u0=(∂yψ,−∂xψ,0). This supplies explicit smooth no-slip data for a three-dimensional MINI backward Euler computation; initialize the discrete scheme with uh0=PZhu0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, ν>0, the unit cube, the displayed compactly supported initial field, zero forcing, and any shape-regular matching mesh and finite time partition.

[F1]

The L2 orthogonal projector PZh exists, and the MINI backward Euler equations have a solution and every solution satisfies the discrete energy inequality. (Discrete Helmholtz projection and pressure Schur identities, The mixed mini-element backward Euler Navier–Stokes scheme, Backward Euler MINI step existence and discrete energy bound)

[F2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, in three dimensions the uniqueness result is conditional on a strong solution branch with the regularity and equation hypotheses stated there. (The Axiom of Choice, Two-dimensional uniqueness and conditional three-dimensional weak–strong uniqueness)

[F3]

H01(D) is the H1-closure of compactly supported smooth fields. (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Stokes velocity and pressure spaces and weak forms)

Verification

1.1F3givenalgebra

The field u0 is smooth and compactly supported in D, so it belongs to H01(D)3. Its divergence is ∂x∂yψ−∂y∂xψ=χ′(x)χ′(y)χ(z)−χ′(x)χ′(y)χ(z)=0, by direct product differentiation. Thus u0∈Vσ and has zero boundary trace.

2.1F1F2givenstep 1.1algebra∎

For any mesh and finite partition, [F1] supplies a discrete trajectory; with f=0, its kinetic energy, time jumps and accumulated viscous dissipation obey the budget in Zero-forcing discrete energy budget. If additionally the Axiom of Choice holds and the continuum data admit a strong branch satisfying [F2], the comparison theorem makes that branch unique among energy weak solutions on its interval. Without that additional strong-solution hypothesis, neither the scheme's existence nor its energy budget selects a unique three-dimensional weak trajectory or asserts that the computed flow is turbulent.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.