Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Natural transformations between tensor composites are governed by bimodule maps

Example

Let A,B,C be unital rings, let M be a (B,A)-bimodule and N a (C,B)-bimodule, with further bimodules M′,N′ of the same types ((S,R)-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions), and write TM=M⊗A− and TN=N⊗B−. By A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product the outer actions make N⊗BM a (C,A)-bimodule, and the associativity isomorphism αX:(N⊗BM)⊗AX→N⊗B(M⊗AX) of Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules identifies the composite functor TN∘TM with the tensor functor TN⊗BM of that bimodule.

Consequently natural transformations TN∘TM⇒TN′∘TM′ correspond bijectively to (C,A)-bimodule maps N⊗BM→N′⊗BM′: conjugating by the two associativity isomorphisms reduces the classification to Natural transformations between tensor functors are bimodule maps. Each pair of bimodule maps g:N→N′ and f:M→M′ yields the transformation with components

αX′∘((g⊗f)⊗1X)∘αX−1:n⊗(m⊗x)⟼g(n)⊗(f(m)⊗x),

and the classification covers all bimodule maps, not only those of the form g⊗f: the verification below exhibits a bimodule map between tensor products of bimodules that is not induced by any pair (g,f).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Unital rings A,B,C, a (B,A)-bimodule M, a (C,B)-bimodule N, bimodules M′,N′ of the same types, and a field k for the witness.

[F1]

The associativity map α:(N⊗BM)⊗AX→N⊗B(M⊗AX), α((n⊗m)⊗x)=n⊗(m⊗x), is a natural isomorphism in X and respects compatible outer actions (Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules).

[F2]

Outer actions: if N is a (C,B)-bimodule and M a left B-module, then N⊗BM carries a left C-action c(n⊗m)=(cn)⊗m; if N is a right B-module and M a (B,A)-bimodule, then N⊗BM carries a right A-action (n⊗m)a=n⊗(ma); when both are present they commute, so N⊗BM is a (C,A)-bimodule. Over a commutative ring k, every left k-module is a (k,k)-bimodule for the same action (A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product, (S,R)-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions).

[F3]

Natural transformations are families of components satisfying the naturality equation, and their vertical composites are componentwise and natural (Natural transformation and its components, Identity natural transformation and vertical composition, Vertical composites of natural transformations satisfy naturality).

[F4]

Induced tensor maps satisfy (f⊗g)(n⊗m)=f(n)⊗g(m) and (f′∘f)⊗(g′∘g)=(f′⊗g′)∘(f⊗g), with id⁡⊗id⁡=id⁡ (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).

[F5]

For (C,A)-bimodules K,K′ the assignment f↦(f⊗1X) is a bijection Hom⁡C-A(K,K′)→Nat⁡(TK,TK′) compatible with vertical composition (Natural transformations between tensor functors are bimodule maps).

[F6]

ρ:k⊗kk→k, ρ(x⊗y)=xy, is a group isomorphism, so every element of k⊗kk is detected by its image under ρ (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

[F7]

Every balanced map into an abelian group factors uniquely through the tensor product: a map β‾ with β‾(m⊗n)=β(m,n) exists exactly for balanced β (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).

[F9]

The module k2 is the direct sum k⊕k with coordinate inclusions ȷ1,ȷ2; for every family of maps k→P there is a unique map k2→P with the prescribed composites, and the empty case is the zero module (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules, Universal property of a direct sum of modules).

Verification

Given: The data of the Example, and for the witness a field k with e1=ȷ1(1), e2=ȷ2(1) the standard generators of k2.

1.1F1F2

The associativity maps αX:(N⊗BM)⊗AX→N⊗B(M⊗AX)=(TN∘TM)(X) are natural isomorphisms in X by [F1], and N⊗BM is a (C,A)-bimodule by [F2], so α is a natural isomorphism of functors TN⊗BM⇒TN∘TM.

1.2F7F8F9

Witness data: take A=B=C=k, M=N=k2, M′=N′=k, all regarded as bimodules via the field action by [F2]. Define β:k2×k2→k by β(m,n)=m1n1+m2n2 for m=m1e1+m2e2, n=n1e1+n2e2. The map β is bilinear, hence balanced by [F8], so by [F7] there is a unique group homomorphism β‾:k2⊗kk2→k with β‾(m⊗n)=β(m,n); it is k-linear because β‾(c(m⊗n))=β(cm,n)=c β(m,n) on generators, and β(ei,ej)=δij since e1,e2 are the standard generators.

2.1F3step 1.1

Conjugation by α and by the corresponding isomorphism α′ for the primed bimodules is a bijection from Nat⁡(TN∘TM,TN′∘TM′) to Nat⁡(TN⊗BM,TN′⊗BM′): for η in the first set put ηX′:=(αX′)−1∘ηX∘αX, a natural transformation by [F3], and the assignment ξ↦(αX′∘ξX∘αX−1) is inverse to it by the componentwise cancellation of inverse natural isomorphisms.

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1

A pair of bimodule maps g:N→N′, f:M→M′ gives the natural transformation TN∘TM⇒TN′∘TM′ with components (g⊗1M′⊗AX)∘(1N⊗(f⊗1X)), equal to αX′∘((g⊗f)⊗1X)∘αX−1 by [F1] and agreement on every n⊗(m⊗x); this is natural by [F3] and [F4], and under the conjugations of step 2.1 it corresponds to the bimodule map g⊗f:N⊗BM→N′⊗BM′ with (g⊗f)(n⊗m)=g(n)⊗f(m) of [F4].

4.1F5step 2.1step 3.1

By [F5] the natural transformations TN⊗BM⇒TN′⊗BM′ correspond bijectively to (C,A)-bimodule maps N⊗BM→N′⊗BM′; composing with the bijection of step 2.1 classifies the transformations between the composites, and step 3.1 identifies the image of every pair (g,f).

5.1F4F6step 1.2step 4.1

The element τ:=ρ−1∘β‾∈Hom⁡k-k(k2⊗kk2,k⊗kk) is a bimodule map by [F6] and step 1.2. Suppose that τ=g⊗f for k-linear g,f:k2→k, i.e. τ(m⊗n)=g(m)⊗f(n) by [F4]; applying the isomorphism ρ of [F6] and evaluating on the four elementary tensors ei⊗ej gives g(ei)f(ej)=ρ(τ(ei⊗ej))=β(ei,ej)=δij. These four equations are contradictory: g(e1)f(e1)=1 forces g(e1)≠0 and f(e1)≠0, then g(e1)f(e2)=0 forces f(e2)=0, and then g(e2)f(e2)=0 contradicts g(e2)f(e2)=1. Hence no pair (g,f) produces τ, while step 4.1 classifies τ as a genuine bimodule map N⊗BM→N′⊗BM′.

6.1step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 4.1 identify TN∘TM with TN⊗BM and classify all natural transformations between the composites by all (C,A)-bimodule maps of kernels, step 3.1 gives the components αX′∘((g⊗f)⊗1X)∘αX−1 for pairs (g,f), and steps 1.2 and 5.1 exhibit a bimodule map not of the form g⊗f. No basis of an infinite-dimensional space and no presentation is chosen, and no commutativity of the rings is assumed.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources