How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonharmonic exact dbar form
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the Hodge-decomposition and elliptic-regularity items used below. Let be the square flat torus with its trivial holomorphic line bundle , constant Hermitian metric and flat compatible metric, and let regarded as a smooth function on . Then is a nonzero -exact -form which is not harmonic, and no nonzero -exact -form is harmonic: the harmonic summand of the Hodge decomposition of meets only at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The square torus, its flat metric, the trivial holomorphic bundle with constant positive Hermitian weight, and full AC as in the Example. All exact forms below are smooth exact forms.
The Wirtinger formula is , and in the trivial frame (The Wirtinger derivatives and , and antiholomorphic functions, Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface).
Smooth sections belong to the maximal domain; the Hilbert adjoint identity is , and (The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface).
The smooth degree-one Hodge decomposition is the orthogonal sum of harmonic forms and smooth exact forms (Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface).
A covering-space action has a covering quotient, and a Riemann surface is a nonempty connected Hausdorff second-countable space with a holomorphic atlas (Covering-space actions by disjoint translates of neighbourhoods, The orbit map of a covering-space action is a covering, with the acting group equal to the deck group when the total space is path-connected, Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases).
Verification
Given: The data in the Example and Facts.
Translation by preserves the Euclidean metric, , and , so these descend to the square torus. The lattice translation action is a covering-space action: disks of radius less than have disjoint nontrivial lattice translates, so [F4] gives a covering quotient and holomorphic charts with translation transitions. The quotient map is open because the preimage of the image of an open set is the union of its translates. For inequivalent , the distance from to the square lattice is positive: only finitely many lattice points lie in any bounded disk, and none equals . Small disks about therefore project to disjoint neighborhoods, proving Hausdorffness. Images of a countable base of plane disks form a countable base of the quotient; it is nonempty and connected as a continuous image of . The image of the closed unit square covers the quotient and is compact, so these charts make it a compact Riemann surface. By [F1], ; this coefficient equals at . Thus is a nonzero smooth exact form.
If a smooth exact form on any compact Riemann surface with the stated metrics is harmonic, [F2] gives and . The first-variable-linear adjoint identity yields , so . Applying this to step 1.1 proves that its exact form is not harmonic. The harmonic and exact summands therefore intersect only at zero, as also expressed by [F3]. Full AC is inherited through those operator and Hodge interfaces; the calculation selects no new family.
Source notes
Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of $\mathbb C$
- Covering-space actions by disjoint translates of neighbourhoods
- Hermitian metric and $L^2$ pairing on a compact Riemann surface
- Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface
- The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface
- Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases
- Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold
- The Wirtinger derivatives $\partial_z f$ and $\partial_{\bar z}f$, and antiholomorphic functions
- The Dolbeault adjoint and Laplacian: local formulas and ellipticity
- Elliptic regularity for Dolbeault harmonic forms
- Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface
- The orbit map of a covering-space action is a covering, with the acting group equal to the deck group when the total space is path-connected
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Pierre Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry (author manuscript, Universite Grenoble Alpes) (standard reference, not scraped)