Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 5 results · all verified · 5 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 5 also cleared it.

Hodge Theory on Compact Riemann Surfaces: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples distinguish smooth Dolbeault cohomology from its metric-dependent harmonic representatives. The square torus supplies a nonzero exact form that cannot be harmonic. On every compact connected curve the degree-zero harmonic functions of the trivial bundle are constants. A varying Hermitian weight on a flat torus changes the degree-one harmonic space, with an explicit normalized representative for the same cohomology class. The sphere has no holomorphic differential and therefore has vanishing degree-one Dolbeault cohomology; a flat torus has one-dimensional cohomology represented by its descended constant form.

All harmonic spaces here use the maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint from hodge-theory-on-compact-riemann-surfaces, with their stated operator domains and choice assumptions. The notation dz on a torus denotes a descended differential, not a global coordinate.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Nonharmonic exact dbar form

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the Hodge-decomposition and elliptic-regularity items used below. Let X=C/(Z⊕iZ) be the square flat torus with its trivial holomorphic line bundle E=X×C, constant Hermitian metric and flat compatible metric, and let f(x,y):=sin⁡(2πx) regarded as a smooth function on X. Then ∂ˉf=πcos⁡(2πx) dzˉ is a nonzero ∂ˉ-exact (0,1)-form which is not harmonic, and no nonzero ∂ˉ-exact (0,1)-form is harmonic: the harmonic summand of the Hodge decomposition of Ω0,1(E) meets ∂ˉE(Ω0,0(E)) only at 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The square torus, its flat metric, the trivial holomorphic bundle with constant positive Hermitian weight, and full AC as in the Example. All exact forms below are smooth exact forms.

[F1]

The Wirtinger formula is ∂zˉ=12(∂x+i∂y), and ∂ˉf=(∂zˉf)dzˉ in the trivial frame (The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions, Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface).

[F2]

Smooth sections belong to the maximal domain; the Hilbert adjoint identity is ⟨Dˉf,a⟩=⟨f,Dˉ∗a⟩, and ker⁡Δ1′′=ker⁡Dˉ∗ (The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface).

[F3]

The smooth degree-one Hodge decomposition is the orthogonal sum of harmonic forms and smooth exact forms (Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface).

[F4]

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts.

1.1F1F4givenconstructalgebra

Translation by m+in preserves the Euclidean metric, dzˉ, and sin⁡(2πx), so these descend to the square torus. The lattice translation action is a covering-space action: disks of radius less than 1/2 have disjoint nontrivial lattice translates, so [F4] gives a covering quotient and holomorphic charts with translation transitions. The quotient map is open because the preimage of the image of an open set is the union of its translates. For inequivalent z,w, the distance from z−w to the square lattice is positive: only finitely many lattice points lie in any bounded disk, and none equals z−w. Small disks about z,w therefore project to disjoint neighborhoods, proving Hausdorffness. Images of a countable base of plane disks form a countable base of the quotient; it is nonempty and connected as a continuous image of C. The image of the closed unit square covers the quotient and is compact, so these charts make it a compact Riemann surface. By [F1], ∂zˉsin⁡(2πx)=πcos⁡(2πx); this coefficient equals π at z=0. Thus ∂ˉf is a nonzero smooth exact form.

2.1F2F3step 1.1givenalgebra∎

If a smooth exact form a=∂ˉEb on any compact Riemann surface with the stated metrics is harmonic, [F2] gives Dˉ∗a=0 and Dˉb=a. The first-variable-linear adjoint identity yields ∥a∥2=⟨Dˉb,a⟩=⟨b,Dˉ∗a⟩=0, so a=0. Applying this to step 1.1 proves that its exact form is not harmonic. The harmonic and exact summands therefore intersect only at zero, as also expressed by [F3]. Full AC is inherited through those operator and Hodge interfaces; the calculation selects no new family.

Source notes

Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

One dimensional constant zero mode of dolbeault laplacian

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the finite-dimensional-kernel and ellipticity items used below. Let X be a compact Riemann surface, E=X×C the trivial holomorphic line bundle with the constant Hermitian metric h0(1,1)=1, and g any compatible Riemannian metric on X. Then the constant function 1 satisfies Δ′′1=0, and the kernel of the Dolbeault Laplacian on functions is exactly H0,0(E)={u∈L2(X): ∂ˉu=0}=C⋅1. Thus the constant zero mode of the Dolbeault Laplacian is one-dimensional, and H0,0(X,E)=H0(X,O)=C: every holomorphic function on a compact connected Riemann surface is constant. The same conclusion holds for the trivial bundle with any Hermitian metric.

Here H0,q(E) denotes the harmonic space H0,q(E)=ker⁡Δq′′ with its smooth representatives, while H0,q(X,E) denotes smooth Dolbeault cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact connected Riemann surface, the trivial holomorphic bundle, any supplied positive smooth Hermitian metric and compatible metric, and full AC. The L2 kernel denotes the kernel on the block-composition operator domain, with equality of functions understood almost everywhere.

[F1]

The degree-zero kernel equals ker⁡Dˉ, and its elements are smooth; conversely smooth sections killed by ∂ˉE are harmonic (The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface, Elliptic regularity for Dolbeault harmonic forms).

[F2]

For the trivial holomorphic bundle, ∂ˉEu=0 means that u is a holomorphic function. A Riemann surface is nonempty and connected (Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface, Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases).

[F3]

A continuous real function on a nonempty compact topological space attains its maximum; a holomorphic function with an interior local maximum of its modulus is constant on a connected plane domain (A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism, Local maximum modulus principle).

[F4]

The Dolbeault degree-zero group is the holomorphic-section space, and is identified with the harmonic degree-zero space (Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional).

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts.

1.1F1F2F3given

If u∈ker⁡Δ0′′, [F1] supplies a smooth representative with ∂ˉEu=0, so [F2] makes it holomorphic. Its modulus attains a maximum M at a point p by compactness and [F3]. Put c=u(p) and S={x:u(x)=c}. This set is closed by continuity and nonempty. At each x∈S, ∣u(x)∣=M, so a connected coordinate disk about x has an interior maximum of ∣u∣; [F3] makes u=c on that disk. Hence S is open, and connectedness forces S=X. Thus every element of the operator kernel is an almost-everywhere constant.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Every constant is smooth, has zero Dolbeault derivative, belongs to the maximal domain, and has zero image in the adjoint domain; therefore it lies in the degree-zero Laplacian domain with Δ0′′u=0. In particular Δ′′1=0 and ker⁡Δ0′′=C⋅1, a one-dimensional space since X is nonempty. By [F4], this is also H0,0(X,E)=H0(X,O). The argument used no value of the Hermitian weight or of the compatible metric, so it proves the final assertion for every supplied smooth positive Hermitian metric. Full AC is inherited through [F1] and [F4].

Source notes

Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Dolbeault cohomology is independent of hermitian metric

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the Hodge-decomposition and finiteness items used below. Let Λ=Zω1⊕Zω2 have real-linearly independent periods and keep the flat torus X=C/Λ with its trivial holomorphic line bundle E=X×C and flat metric, and let h0 be the constant Hermitian metric h0(1,1)=1 and h1 the Hermitian metric h1(1,1)=eφ for a nonconstant smooth real function φ on X. Then:

  1. The harmonic spaces differ: with h0, the harmonic (0,1)-forms are C⋅dzˉ, while with h1 they are C⋅e−φdzˉ, so the harmonic representative of the class [dzˉ] is dzˉ for h0 and the suitable multiple of e−φdzˉ for h1.
  2. The Dolbeault cohomology does not depend on the metric: H0,1(X,E) and H0,0(X,E) are computed from ∂ˉE alone, and the harmonic-representative isomorphisms for h0 and for h1 show H0,1(X,E)≅C  (dimension 1),H0,0(X,E)=C, for both choices.
  3. Consequently the numbers h0,0(X,E) and h0,1(X,E) are invariants of the holomorphic line bundle; the dependence on the Hermitian metric lies entirely in the choice of harmonic representative.

Here H0,q(E) denotes the harmonic space H0,q(E)=ker⁡Δq′′ with its smooth representatives, while H0,q(X,E) denotes smooth Dolbeault cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rank-two lattice Λ⊂C, its flat compact torus, the trivial holomorphic bundle, weights ψ0=1, ψ1=eφ with smooth nonconstant real φ, and full AC. Write dA=dx dy, A=∫XdA>0 and J=∫Xe−φdA>0.

[F1]

Smooth degree-one harmonic forms are exactly those with zero Hilbert adjoint; the adjoint on a smooth form in a flat chart is ∂ˉh∗(u dzˉ)=−2ψ−1∂z(ψu). Harmonic forms are smooth (The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface, The Dolbeault adjoint and Laplacian: local formulas and ellipticity, Elliptic regularity for Dolbeault harmonic forms).

[F2]

A bounded entire function is constant. A smooth function satisfies ∂zˉf=0 exactly when it is holomorphic (Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant, Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface).

[F3]

Smooth degree-one forms split orthogonally into harmonic and smooth exact forms; every Dolbeault class has one harmonic representative. The cohomology groups are the smooth Dolbeault kernel and quotient, and their dimensions are finite (Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface, Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional).

[F4]

The first-variable-linear degree-one pairing in flat charts is ⟨u dzˉ,v dzˉ⟩L2=2∫Xψuvˉ dA (Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Translation charts on X have identity derivatives, so dzˉ is a global nonvanishing form and every smooth (0,1)-form is u dzˉ with a smooth lattice-periodic coefficient on the cover. For any positive smooth weight ψ, [F1] says it is harmonic precisely when ∂z(ψu)=0. Then ψu‾ lifts to an entire function, bounded because it is periodic and bounded on the closed fundamental parallelogram. By [F2] it is constant. Conversely u=c/ψ is smooth and satisfies that adjoint equation, hence is harmonic. Thus the two spaces are Cdzˉ and Ce−φdzˉ; they differ because their equality would force the positive function e−φ to be constant. Holomorphic functions on this torus likewise lift to bounded entire functions and are constant.

2.1F3F4step 1.1givenalgebra

Set b=e−φdzˉ. By [F4], ⟨dzˉ,b⟩h1=2A and ⟨b,b⟩h1=2J. Hence the orthogonal projection of dzˉ onto Cb is (A/J)b in the first-variable-linear convention. By [F3] the projection differs from dzˉ by a smooth exact form, so the harmonic representative of [dzˉ] for h1 is precisely (A/J)e−φdzˉ. For h0 it is dzˉ itself. In particular the class is nonzero, since its harmonic representative is nonzero.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1given∎

The smooth operator ∂ˉE is determined by the holomorphic transitions, so the same vector space ker⁡∂ˉE in degree zero and the same quotient Ω0,1(E)/∂ˉEΩ0,0(E) in degree one define the cohomology for both metrics. The harmonic isomorphisms of [F3] and step 1.1 therefore give H0,0(X,E)=C and dim⁡H0,1(X,E)=1 for either metric. For any compact Riemann surface and fixed holomorphic bundle the same kernel/quotient observation proves that h0,0,h0,1 are invariant under changing either supplied metric; only the harmonic representative can change. Full AC is inherited through [F1] and [F3]; the explicit projection uses no additional choice.

Source notes

Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Dolbeault h zero one of the riemann sphere vanishes

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the harmonic-star duality and finiteness items used below. Let X=C^ be the Riemann sphere with its holomorphic charts (The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity, Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere with the unit two-sphere, The Riemann sphere is the published one-point compactification of the complex plane), let E=X×C be the trivial holomorphic line bundle with the constant Hermitian metric, and let g be any compatible Riemannian metric. Then

H0,0(X,E)=C⋅1,H0,1(X,E)=0, so the Dolbeault group H0,1 of the trivial bundle on the sphere vanishes in every degree q=1; equivalently the space H0(X,K) of holomorphic differentials is zero, so there is no nonzero holomorphic 1-form on the sphere. In particular every ∂ˉ-closed (0,1)-form on the sphere is ∂ˉ-exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact Riemann sphere, the trivial holomorphic line bundle with constant positive weight, any compatible metric, and full AC.

[F1]

The sphere has charts z on C and w=1/z about infinity. A holomorphic differential has holomorphic chart coefficients with the differential transition law (The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity, Meromorphic differentials, orders and residues, Holomorphic line bundles and meromorphic sections on a Riemann surface).

[F2]

Every bounded entire function is constant (Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant).

[F3]

Harmonic-star duality is a conjugate-linear isomorphism H0,1(E)→H0(X,K⊗E∗); Dolbeault cohomology is identified with harmonic representatives, and degree zero is the holomorphic-section space (Harmonic star duality for line bundle valued dolbeault cohomology, Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional, Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface).

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts.

1.1F1F2F3given

A holomorphic function on the sphere is entire in the z chart and bounded near infinity, since its w-chart expression is continuous at 0. It is also bounded on each closed disk, so is bounded on all of C. By [F2] it is constant, and all constants are global holomorphic sections of the trivial bundle. Thus [F3] gives H0,0(X,E)=C⋅1.

1.2F1F2givenalgebra

Write a global holomorphic differential as f(z)dz on C, with f entire. In the other chart it is a(w)dw, where a(w)=−w−2f(1/w) for w≠0 by [F1]. Holomorphy at w=0 bounds a on a small closed disk. Consequently ∣f(z)∣≤C∣z∣−2 for sufficiently large ∣z∣. The entire function f is bounded on a closed disk and on its exterior, so [F2] makes it constant; the displayed decay forces that constant to vanish. Therefore H0(X,K)=0.

2.1F1F3step 1.1step 1.2given∎

The trivial dual bundle identifies K⊗E∗ holomorphically with K. By [F3] and step 1.2, the degree-one harmonic space and hence H0,1(X,E) are zero. Every smooth (0,1)-form on a curve is closed because there are no (0,2)-forms; its zero cohomology class says exactly that it is ∂ˉE of a global smooth function. This proves the stated exactness for any supplied compatible metric. Full AC is inherited through duality and the harmonic representative interfaces.

Source notes

Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Flat torus dolbeault harmonic representatives

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the harmonic-projection, finiteness and duality items used below. Let Λ=Zω1⊕Zω2⊆C be a lattice: ω1,ω2 are R-linearly independent complex numbers. Let X:=C/Λ be the quotient by the translation action of Λ, with its quotient topology (The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection); the action is a covering-space action with quotient map p:C→X a covering (Covering-space actions by disjoint translates of neighbourhoods, The orbit map of a covering-space action is a covering, with the acting group equal to the deck group when the total space is path-connected, Covering maps are surjective local homeomorphisms with discrete fibres). Then X is a compact Riemann surface: the local inverses of p are charts, and their transition functions are translations, hence holomorphic (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts); compactness holds because the closed fundamental parallelogram {sω1+tω2:0≤s,t≤1} maps onto X.

Let E=X×C be the trivial holomorphic line bundle and let h be the Hermitian metric with h(1,1)=1; let g be the flat compatible Riemannian metric transported from the Euclidean metric of C. Then:

  1. H0,0(E)=C⋅1: the harmonic functions for E are exactly the constants.
  2. H0,1(E)=C⋅dzˉ: the harmonic (0,1)-forms are exactly the constant multiples of dzˉ.
  3. H0,1(X,E)=C⋅[dzˉ] has dimension 1, with harmonic representative dzˉ; equivalently, under harmonic star duality the holomorphic differentials on X are exactly the constant multiples of dz, so H0(X,K)=C⋅dz.
  4. The same conclusions hold with ω1=1,ω2=i for the square torus X=C/(Z⊕iZ), the model computed below.

Here H0,q(E) denotes the harmonic space H0,q(E)=ker⁡Δq′′ with its smooth representatives, while H0,q(X,E) denotes smooth Dolbeault cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two real-linearly independent periods, the translation quotient, the trivial holomorphic bundle with weight 1, the transported Euclidean metric, and full AC. The symbols dz,dzˉ on X denote descended forms; z itself is only a local coordinate.

[F2]

Harmonic forms in both degrees are smooth; degree zero is ker⁡Dˉ and degree one is ker⁡Dˉ∗. On smooth forms with ρ=ψ=1, ∂ˉf=(∂zˉf)dzˉ and ∂ˉ∗(u dzˉ)=−2∂zu (The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface, Elliptic regularity for Dolbeault harmonic forms, The Dolbeault adjoint and Laplacian: local formulas and ellipticity).

[F3]
[F4]

Smooth degree-one cohomology classes have unique harmonic representatives; the degree-zero group is the holomorphic-section space. The bundle star gives a conjugate-linear isomorphism from the degree-one harmonic space to H0(X,K⊗E∗), and in these flat trivial conventions sends u dzˉ to −iuˉ dz (Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface, Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional, Harmonic star duality for line bundle valued dolbeault cohomology, Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts.

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

The real-linear isomorphism T(s,t)=sω1+tω2 has continuous inverse. Its inverse is bounded, so for some c>0, ∣T(m,n)∣≥cm2+n2; every nonzero period therefore has length at least c. Disks of radius less than c/2 have pairwise disjoint lattice translates and give the covering-action neighborhoods in [F1]. The quotient map is open since the preimage of the image of an open set is the union of its translates. The quotient is Hausdorff: for inequivalent z,w, only finitely many lattice points lie in any bounded disk by the bound just proved, so inf⁡λ∈Λ∣z−w−λ∣>0; sufficiently small disks about z,w project to disjoint neighborhoods. Images of a countable base of disks in C give a countable base of the quotient. It is nonempty and connected as a continuous image of C. The projected closed parallelogram T([0,1]2) covers it by subtracting integer parts of the real coordinates, and is compact, making X compact. Local inverses of the quotient map give charts with translation transitions. These are holomorphic and smooth, establishing the asserted compact Riemann surface and the descended flat compatible metric. Translation invariance also descends dz,dzˉ; no fundamental parallelogram is treated as a single global chart.

2.1F2F3step 1.1given

By [F2], a harmonic function is smooth and its lift is entire and lattice-periodic. It is bounded on the compact parallelogram and hence everywhere, so [F3] makes it constant. Conversely constants have zero Dolbeault derivative and are harmonic by [F2]. Every smooth degree-one form is u dzˉ with a periodic smooth coefficient, since dzˉ is a global frame. Its adjoint vanishes exactly when ∂zu=0, so uˉ is an entire periodic function on the cover. The same boundedness and [F3] make u constant; conversely constant coefficients have zero adjoint and are harmonic. Thus H0,0(E)=C1 and H0,1(E)=Cdzˉ.

3.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

By [F4] each smooth Dolbeault class has a unique representative in the space computed in step 2.1, so the quotient is spanned by [dzˉ]. This class is nonzero: if dzˉ=∂ˉf with smooth f, the adjoint identity gives ∥dzˉ∥2=⟨f,∂ˉ∗dzˉ⟩=0, contradicting its everywhere nonzero pointwise norm and positive volume. Hence H0,1(X,E)=C[dzˉ] has dimension one and dzˉ is its harmonic representative. A holomorphic differential lifts to a(z)dz with entire periodic coefficient a, so [F3] makes a constant; conversely dz descends and is holomorphic. Thus H0(X,K)=Cdz, consistently with the conjugate-linear star formula in [F4]. Taking ω1=1,ω2=i specializes every argument to the square torus. Full AC is inherited through [F2] and [F4]; the geometric construction and Liouville computation introduce no further choice.

Source notes

Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources