Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Flat torus dolbeault harmonic representatives

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited through the harmonic-projection, finiteness and duality items used below. Let Λ=Zω1⊕Zω2⊆C be a lattice: ω1,ω2 are R-linearly independent complex numbers. Let X:=C/Λ be the quotient by the translation action of Λ, with its quotient topology (The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection); the action is a covering-space action with quotient map p:C→X a covering (Covering-space actions by disjoint translates of neighbourhoods, The orbit map of a covering-space action is a covering, with the acting group equal to the deck group when the total space is path-connected, Covering maps are surjective local homeomorphisms with discrete fibres). Then X is a compact Riemann surface: the local inverses of p are charts, and their transition functions are translations, hence holomorphic (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts); compactness holds because the closed fundamental parallelogram {sω1+tω2:0≤s,t≤1} maps onto X.

Let E=X×C be the trivial holomorphic line bundle and let h be the Hermitian metric with h(1,1)=1; let g be the flat compatible Riemannian metric transported from the Euclidean metric of C. Then:

  1. H0,0(E)=C⋅1: the harmonic functions for E are exactly the constants.
  2. H0,1(E)=C⋅dzˉ: the harmonic (0,1)-forms are exactly the constant multiples of dzˉ.
  3. H0,1(X,E)=C⋅[dzˉ] has dimension 1, with harmonic representative dzˉ; equivalently, under harmonic star duality the holomorphic differentials on X are exactly the constant multiples of dz, so H0(X,K)=C⋅dz.
  4. The same conclusions hold with ω1=1,ω2=i for the square torus X=C/(Z⊕iZ), the model computed below.

Here H0,q(E) denotes the harmonic space H0,q(E)=ker⁡Δq′′ with its smooth representatives, while H0,q(X,E) denotes smooth Dolbeault cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two real-linearly independent periods, the translation quotient, the trivial holomorphic bundle with weight 1, the transported Euclidean metric, and full AC. The symbols dz,dzˉ on X denote descended forms; z itself is only a local coordinate.

[F2]

Harmonic forms in both degrees are smooth; degree zero is ker⁡Dˉ and degree one is ker⁡Dˉ∗. On smooth forms with ρ=ψ=1, ∂ˉf=(∂zˉf)dzˉ and ∂ˉ∗(u dzˉ)=−2∂zu (The maximal Dolbeault operator and its Hilbert adjoint on a compact Riemann surface, Elliptic regularity for Dolbeault harmonic forms, The Dolbeault adjoint and Laplacian: local formulas and ellipticity).

[F3]
[F4]

Smooth degree-one cohomology classes have unique harmonic representatives; the degree-zero group is the holomorphic-section space. The bundle star gives a conjugate-linear isomorphism from the degree-one harmonic space to H0(X,K⊗E∗), and in these flat trivial conventions sends u dzˉ to −iuˉ dz (Hodge decomposition for Dolbeault forms on a compact Riemann surface, Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional, Harmonic star duality for line bundle valued dolbeault cohomology, Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

Verification

Given: The data in the Example and Facts.

1.1F1givenconstructalgebra

The real-linear isomorphism T(s,t)=sω1+tω2 has continuous inverse. Its inverse is bounded, so for some c>0, ∣T(m,n)∣≥cm2+n2; every nonzero period therefore has length at least c. Disks of radius less than c/2 have pairwise disjoint lattice translates and give the covering-action neighborhoods in [F1]. The quotient map is open since the preimage of the image of an open set is the union of its translates. The quotient is Hausdorff: for inequivalent z,w, only finitely many lattice points lie in any bounded disk by the bound just proved, so inf⁡λ∈Λ∣z−w−λ∣>0; sufficiently small disks about z,w project to disjoint neighborhoods. Images of a countable base of disks in C give a countable base of the quotient. It is nonempty and connected as a continuous image of C. The projected closed parallelogram T([0,1]2) covers it by subtracting integer parts of the real coordinates, and is compact, making X compact. Local inverses of the quotient map give charts with translation transitions. These are holomorphic and smooth, establishing the asserted compact Riemann surface and the descended flat compatible metric. Translation invariance also descends dz,dzˉ; no fundamental parallelogram is treated as a single global chart.

2.1F2F3step 1.1given

By [F2], a harmonic function is smooth and its lift is entire and lattice-periodic. It is bounded on the compact parallelogram and hence everywhere, so [F3] makes it constant. Conversely constants have zero Dolbeault derivative and are harmonic by [F2]. Every smooth degree-one form is u dzˉ with a periodic smooth coefficient, since dzˉ is a global frame. Its adjoint vanishes exactly when ∂zu=0, so uˉ is an entire periodic function on the cover. The same boundedness and [F3] make u constant; conversely constant coefficients have zero adjoint and are harmonic. Thus H0,0(E)=C1 and H0,1(E)=Cdzˉ.

3.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

By [F4] each smooth Dolbeault class has a unique representative in the space computed in step 2.1, so the quotient is spanned by [dzˉ]. This class is nonzero: if dzˉ=∂ˉf with smooth f, the adjoint identity gives ∥dzˉ∥2=⟨f,∂ˉ∗dzˉ⟩=0, contradicting its everywhere nonzero pointwise norm and positive volume. Hence H0,1(X,E)=C[dzˉ] has dimension one and dzˉ is its harmonic representative. A holomorphic differential lifts to a(z)dz with entire periodic coefficient a, so [F3] makes a constant; conversely dz descends and is holomorphic. Thus H0(X,K)=Cdz, consistently with the conjugate-linear star formula in [F4]. Taking ω1=1,ω2=i specializes every argument to the square torus. Full AC is inherited through [F2] and [F4]; the geometric construction and Liouville computation introduce no further choice.

Source notes

Demailly’s Dolbeault results in §7 apply to a holomorphic Hermitian bundle; the flat-connection de Rham decomposition in §3.3 is contextual and is not used for a varying Hermitian weight. The verification above uses proved local operator interfaces and gives the concrete calculation itself.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

143 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources