How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-dimensional Dirichlet Green kernel on an interval
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For and , the one-dimensional Dirichlet kernel for is . It is symmetric, nonnegative, vanishes at , and its -derivative has jump , so in . Its difference from is affine in . The stated Countable Choice assumption is used for the named Lebesgue-measure and regular-distribution interfaces below; no full Axiom of Choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume , let , fix , and put . The differential operator is .
Countable Choice is written (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It enters through the Borel-to-Lebesgue, finite-interval measure, Riemann-to-Lebesgue, and published locally-integrable-to-distribution interfaces used in steps 2.2, 3.2 and 6.1. The piecewise slope and integration-by-parts calculations themselves make no choice.
For two real numbers the minimum and maximum select the lesser and greater values (Maximum and minimum of a set).
The one-dimensional normalized kernel is ; the assigned Laplace definition separately verifies (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian). A fundamental solution of is a distribution with , and its translated distribution has source (Fundamental solution of a constant-coefficient operator).
A test function on has compact support in that open interval, so its zero extension is smooth on and it vanishes near both endpoints (Test function space d of an open set).
The distributional second derivative satisfies (Distributional derivative).
The Dirac distribution satisfies (Dirac delta and its derivatives).
If are differentiable on a closed interval and their derivatives are integrable, integration by parts gives (If are differentiable on with integrable, then ). The statement is real-valued; apply it to the real and imaginary parts of a complex test separately.
A continuous real function on a closed bounded interval is Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).
The Riemann integral is additive over adjacent subintervals (For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary ).
Under , every bounded Riemann-integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue integrable there with the same integral (A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral).
A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, and under Borel functions on are Lebesgue measurable (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, Borel measurable and Lebesgue measurable functions on ).
Under , the interval is measurable and (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included). The nonnegative integral is monotone and positively homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
A measurable complex function is integrable when its absolute value has finite integral (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals); local integrability is defined by finite absolute integrals on balls or, on an open set, on each compact subset (A locally integrable function on , Regular distribution from a locally integrable function).
A locally integrable function defines the regular functional (Regular distribution from a locally integrable function).
Under , this regular functional is a distribution (Locally integrable functions embed in distributions).
Proof
Let on and extend it by zero off , including the endpoint values. By [F1], its branches on and are and . They agree at , both giving , and vanish at , so the extension is continuous and compactly supported. Swapping leaves the min/max formula unchanged. Both factors are nonnegative on either branch, and their sum is at most , so their product is at most ; hence is symmetric, nonnegative, bounded by , and .
On and , respectively, the affine branches from step 1.1 have one-sided derivatives and . Therefore .
The continuous compactly supported extension is Borel by [F10] and hence Lebesgue measurable under [A1]. It is supported in and bounded by by step 1.1. By [F11], . Thus it is integrable and its restriction is locally integrable on by [F12] and monotonicity of the nonnegative integral. This is the exact measure-side use of .
By [F2], the one-dimensional free-space fundamental profile translated to is . For , is affine with slope ; for it is affine with slope . Step 2.1 makes those slopes equal, and step 1.1 gives continuity at , so the two pieces form one affine function on .
The locally integrable function defines the regular functional by [F13], and [F14] makes a distribution under . No full Axiom of Choice is used.
Fix a real-valued . By [F3], vanishes near . On , apply [F6] first with and then with ; the functions and derivatives involved are continuous and integrable by [F7]. This gives .
Since also vanishes near , the same two applications of [F6] on , with slope , give .
By [F8], the two Riemann integrals from steps 4.1 and 5.1 sum to the Riemann integral on ; by [F9] and [A1], this equals the Lebesgue integral that gives , since vanishes near the endpoints. The terms at cancel, and step 2.1 gives . Apply this real calculation to the real and imaginary parts of a complex test. By [F4], [F5] and [F13], . Thus in .
Source notes
Hunter, §2.6 equation (2.13), printed p. 33 (PDF p. 39), gives the free-space one-dimensional profile ; the discussion on printed p. 40 (PDF p. 46) writes the corresponding whole-line potential for . Teschl, §5.4 Problem 5.21, printed p. 129 (PDF p. 142), asks the reader to find the Green function for an interval but supplies neither its formula nor a solution. The piecewise Dirichlet formula, its endpoint and symmetry checks, and the distributional jump computation above are derived directly; the sources supply context and normalization, not this proof.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Fundamental solution of a constant-coefficient operator
- Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian
- Maximum and minimum of a set
- Test function space d of an open set
- Distributional derivative
- Dirac delta and its derivatives
- If $u,v$ are differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $u',v'$ integrable, then $\int_a^b u v' = u(b)v(b)-u(a)v(a) - \int_a^b u'v$
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- For $a<c<b$: $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ if and only if it is integrable on $[a,c]$ and on $[c,b]$, and then $\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f$; with the oriented form for arbitrary $a,b,c$
- A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral
- A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets
- Borel measurable and Lebesgue measurable functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
- A locally integrable function on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Regular distribution from a locally integrable function
- Locally integrable functions embed in distributions
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (2014) (standard reference, not scraped)