Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One scrambled rule versus independent full-set replicates

Example

Take b=2, d=1, and the (0,1,1)-net with points a1=0 and a2=1/2. Use a nested uniform scramble and the integrand f(x)=x. Compute the exact variance of one scrambled estimate and explain what independent full-set replicates add.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-point net, its nested uniform scramble, fixed target I=∫01x dx, and independent repetitions of the complete scrambled set.

[F1]

(λ,t,m,d)-nets in base b: A (0,1,1)-net in base 2 has one point in each half interval.

[F2]

Nested uniform scrambling of a finite point set: The permutation at each input-prefix node is shared by points with that prefix and independent across distinct nodes.

[F3]

Marginal uniformity makes an RQMC rule unbiased: Marginally uniform points give an unbiased estimator of the cube integral.

[F4]

Independent RQMC replicates estimate randomization variance: For R≥2 independent full-set randomizations, V^R estimates the variance of their replicate mean.

[F5]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: The variance of a square-integrable real variable is its centered second moment.

[F6]

Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables: Integrable functions of independent random variables have factored product expectation.

[F7]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ): Expectation is linear on integrable real random variables.

Verification

1.1F1F2given

The first input digits of 0 and 1/2 differ, so the first permutation sends them to opposite halves. The net count from [F1] is preserved, leaving one point in each half.

2.1F2step 1.1

The two input-prefix paths remain distinct after the first digit; hence all their subsequent node permutations are independent. Each tail is a sequence of independent uniform binary digits, so conditional on the first permutation the two scrambled points are independent uniform variables in their assigned half intervals.

3.1F3F5F6F7step 2.1algebra

A uniform variable on an interval of width 1/2 has variance (1/2)2/12=1/48. Under either value of the first permutation, step 2.1 gives the same law for Z: half the sum of independent uniforms on the lower and upper halves. Thus this is also its unconditional law. The single-rule estimate Z=(X1+X2)/2 is unbiased for I=1/2 by [F3], and [F6]–[F7] give Var⁡(Z)=(1/48+1/48)/4=1/96 by [F5].

4.1F4step 3.1algebra∎

One realized estimate Z cannot form the centered replicate variance formula because R(R−1)=0 at R=1. With R≥2 independent full-set scrambles, [F4] gives an unbiased estimate of Var⁡(Z‾R)=1/(96R). The target integral is fixed, so this is computation-randomization uncertainty only.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources