Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Simply connected h-cobordisms have zero Whitehead obstruction

Example

Assume ACω. Let (W;M0,M1) be a connected smooth h-cobordism of dimension n+1≥6 with M0 simply connected and closed. Then Wh⁡(1)=0, so every finite based handle complex of (W,M0) has torsion class 0 and the s-cobordism criterion produces a diffeomorphism W≅M0×[0,1] relative to M0, recovering the simply connected h-cobordism theorem of the preceding pair as the case π=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A connected smooth h-cobordism (W;M0,M1) of dimension n+1≥6 with M0 closed, connected and simply connected.

[F1]

The trivial group has vanishing Whitehead group: Z[1]=Z; the determinant is a well-defined surjection K1(Z)→{±1} because every elementary matrix has determinant 1; and it is injective, since a common divisor of the entries of a column of an invertible integer matrix divides the determinant ±1, the division algorithm with the Bézout identity reduces such a primitive column to (±1,0,…,0)T by elementary row additions and swaps, and induction on the size then presents every invertible integer matrix, up to permutation, as elementarily equivalent to a diagonal matrix with entries ±1, whose class is a sum of classes [±1]; hence K1(Z)≅{±1} and Wh⁡(1)=K1(Z)/⟨[±1]⟩=0 (K₁ of a ring and the Whitehead group of a discrete group, Division with remainder in Z: for a∈Z and b>0 there are unique q,r∈Z with a=qb+r and 0≤r<b, Bézout's identity: for integers a,b not both zero, gcd⁡(a,b) is the least positive element of { ax+by:x,y∈Z }; in particular ax+by=gcd⁡(a,b) has an integer solution).

[F2]

For a simply connected closed M0 the fundamental group π1(M0) is trivial, and the presentation-indexed torsion of every finite handle presentation of (W,M0) is an element of Wh⁡(π1(M0))=Wh⁡(1) (Simply connected topological spaces, h-Cobordism).

[F3]

The presentation-relative s-cobordism criterion: W is diffeomorphic to M0×[0,1] relative to M0 if and only if some finite handle presentation H of (W,M0) has τH(W,M0)=0 (The smooth s-cobordism theorem: a vanishing presentation implies a product).

[F4]

A product cobordism M0×[0,1] has the critical-point-free height-function presentation relative to M0×{0} (Product cobordisms have critical-point-free presentations).

[F5]

A finite handle presentation of (W,M0) exists: the two-index normal-form lemma, applied at any allowed index to the oriented data below, produces a handle decomposition of W relative to M0 under the countable-choice hypothesis ACω assumed here (h-cobordisms admit two-index normal form presentations, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F6]

The oriented hypotheses of the criterion hold automatically. If M0 were nonorientable, its orientation double cover would be a connected two-sheeted cover of the simply connected space M0 (The orientation double cover is canonically oriented and preserves closedness), contradicting the triviality of connected covers of a simply connected space (A connected covering of a locally path-connected simply connected space is one-sheeted and trivial); hence M0 is orientable, and the homotopy equivalence M0↪W of the h-cobordism carries π1(M0)=1 to π1(W)=1, so the boundaryless interior of W is simply connected: pushing boundary-collar coordinates a small positive distance inward gives a homotopy equivalence int⁡W↪W, with its homotopies keeping positive coordinates positive. Apply the same cover argument to int⁡W. Its orientation extends over the product boundary collars to W, with M1 inheriting a compatible boundary orientation (Homotopy equivalences, homotopy inverses and spaces of the same homotopy type, h-Cobordism, Simply connected topological spaces).

Verification

1.1F1F2given

By [F1] the Whitehead group of the trivial group vanishes, and by [F2] the fundamental group of the simply connected closed manifold M0 is trivial, so every presentation-indexed class τH(W,M0) of a finite handle presentation of (W,M0) lies in Wh⁡(1)=0 and is therefore the zero class.

2.1F2F3F5F6step 1.1

Take the finite handle presentation H of (W,M0) supplied by [F5]; by step 1.1 its class vanishes, and by [F6] the oriented hypotheses of the criterion are met, so applying [F3] with this presentation yields a diffeomorphism W≅M0×[0,1] relative to M0.

3.1F3F4step 2.1∎

The product model is consistent with the conclusion: the height function of M0×[0,1] has no critical points and presents it with the empty handle list by [F4], whose torsion class is zero by the criterion; conversely the argument of steps 1.1 and 2.1 shows that every simply connected h-cobordism in dimension n+1≥6 is a product, which is the simply connected h-cobordism theorem as the case π=1 of the presentation-relative criterion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources