Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: all norms on a real vector space are equivalent

Statement

False claim: any two norms on a real vector space are equivalent (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics).

What is true is the same statement for Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with nn a natural number, which is For n1n \ge 1 all norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent. Dropping the hypothesis that the space is one of the Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} makes the claim false, and the witness below is built from published material only.

The witness. Let RN\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}} be the function space of all functions NR\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{R} with pointwise operations (The vector space FXF^{X} of all functions XFX \to F with pointwise operations, and FnF^{n} as the case X=n={0,1,,n1}X = n = \{0, 1, \dots, n-1\}), and let

V  :=  {vRN  :  there is KN with vj=0 for every jK}V \;:=\; \bigl\{\, v \in \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}} \;:\; \text{there is } K \in \mathbb{N} \text{ with } v_j = 0 \text{ for every } j \ge K \,\bigr\}

be the set of finitely supported sequences. On VV define

N1(v):=j<Kvj,N(v):=max{vj:j<K},N_1(v) := \sum_{j<K}|v_j|, \qquad N_\infty(v) := \max\{\, |v_j| : j<K \,\},

for any K1K \ge 1 with vj=0v_j = 0 for jKj \ge K. Both are norms on VV, both values are independent of the admissible KK chosen, and no real CC satisfies N1CNN_1 \le C\,N_\infty on VV.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The space RN\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}, the subset VV, the functions N1N_1 and NN_\infty above, and, for m1m \ge 1, the vector u(m)Vu^{(m)} \in V with uj(m)=1u^{(m)}_j = 1 for j<mj<m and uj(m)=0u^{(m)}_j = 0 for jmj \ge m. For iNi \in \mathbb{N}, eiRNe_i \in \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}} is the function with ei(i)=1e_i(i) = 1 and ei(j)=0e_i(j) = 0 for jij \ne i.

[A1]

The refuted claim: any two norms on a real vector space are equivalent.

[L3]

Laws of finite sums (Laws of finite sums and finite products, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion): additivity, scaling, splitting, monotonicity, a sum of nonnegative terms is nonnegative, a vanishing sum of nonnegative terms has all terms 00, and j<m1=ι(m)\sum_{j<m}1 = \iota(m).

[L4]

Maxima (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set): a nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum, which belongs to it and bounds it above.

[L5]

Absolute value (Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value, The triangle inequality): t0|t| \ge 0; t=0|t| = 0 exactly when t=0t = 0; st=st|st| = |s||t|; s+ts+t|s+t| \le |s|+|t|.

[L6]

The Archimedean property: for every real xx there is a natural m1m \ge 1 with x<ι(m)x < \iota(m) (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

[L8]

Norm equivalence: MM and NN are equivalent when cMNCMcM \le N \le CM for some reals c,C>0c,C>0 (Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics); the norm axioms are (N1), (N2), (N3) (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms); and induction (The principle of mathematical induction).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

VV is a linear subspace of RN\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}}, hence a real vector space: it contains 00, and if vj=0v_j = 0 for jKj \ge K and wj=0w_j = 0 for jKj \ge K' then (λv+w)j=0(\lambda v + w)_j = 0 for jmax{K,K}j \ge \max\{K,K'\}.

L1L4
1.2

The values N1(v)N_1(v) and N(v)N_\infty(v) do not depend on the admissible KK. If KKK \le K' are both admissible, then splitting the sum gives j<Kvj=j<Kvj+j=KK1vj\sum_{j<K'}|v_j| = \sum_{j<K}|v_j| + \sum_{j=K}^{K'-1}|v_j|, and the second part is a sum of zeros; and max{vj:j<K}=max{vj:j<K}\max\{|v_j| : j<K'\} = \max\{|v_j| : j<K\} because the extra entries are 00 and the maximum over j<Kj<K is v00\ge |v_0| \ge 0.

L3L4L5
1.3

The hypothesis that fails is finite-dimensionality. For every pNp \in \mathbb{N} the set {ei:i<p}\{\, e_i : i<p \,\} is a subset of VV with pp elements, the map ieii \mapsto e_i being injective because ei(i)=10=ei(i)e_i(i) = 1 \ne 0 = e_{i'}(i) for iii \ne i'; and it is linearly independent, since for an injective list leill \mapsto e_{i_l} into it and scalars λ\lambda, evaluating l<qλleil=0\sum_{l<q}\lambda_l e_{i_l} = 0 at the point il0i_{l_0} gives λl0=0\lambda_{l_0} = 0, the list lλleil(il0)l \mapsto \lambda_l e_{i_l}(i_{l_0}) vanishing off the single index l0l_0.

L2L3L5
2.1

N1N_1 is a norm on VV. (N1): N1(v)=0N_1(v) = 0 forces every vj=0|v_j| = 0 for j<Kj<K, hence v=0v = 0; and N1(0)=0N_1(0) = 0. (N2): λv\lambda v is admissible with the same KK and j<Kλvj=λj<Kvj\sum_{j<K}|\lambda v_j| = |\lambda|\sum_{j<K}|v_j|. (N3): with KK admissible for both vv and ww, j<Kvj+wjj<Kvj+j<Kwj\sum_{j<K}|v_j+w_j| \le \sum_{j<K}|v_j| + \sum_{j<K}|w_j| termwise.

step 1.2L3L5L8
2.2

NN_\infty is a norm on VV. (N1): N(v)=0N_\infty(v) = 0 forces vj0|v_j| \le 0 and 0\ge 0 for every j<Kj<K, hence v=0v = 0. (N2): max{λvj}=λmax{vj}\max\{|\lambda v_j|\} = |\lambda|\max\{|v_j|\}, since λvjλN(v)|\lambda||v_j| \le |\lambda|N_\infty(v) for every jj with equality at an index attaining the maximum. (N3): vj+wjvj+wjN(v)+N(w)|v_j+w_j| \le |v_j|+|w_j| \le N_\infty(v)+N_\infty(w) for every j<Kj<K, and the maximum on the left is one of those numbers.

step 1.2L4L5L8
2.3

For m1m \ge 1 the vector u(m)u^{(m)} lies in VV, and K=mK = m is admissible for it; so N1(u(m))=j<m1=ι(m)N_1(u^{(m)}) = \sum_{j<m}1 = \iota(m) and N(u(m))=max{1,,1}=1N_\infty(u^{(m)}) = \max\{1,\dots,1\} = 1.

step 1.2L3L4L5
2.4

So VV has no finite basis: a basis BB with qq elements would span VV, forcing every linearly independent subset to have at most qq elements, while step 1.3 produces one with q+1q+1. Hence VV is infinite-dimensional, and For n1n \ge 1 all norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent, which is a statement about Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} for a natural nn, does not apply to it.

step 1.3L7
3.1

Suppose N1N_1 and NN_\infty were equivalent, so that in particular N1(v)CN(v)N_1(v) \le C\,N_\infty(v) for every vVv \in V and some real C>0C > 0. Then ι(m)C\iota(m) \le C for every m1m \ge 1, by step 2.3.

step 2.3L8
4.1

That contradicts the Archimedean property, which supplies a natural m1m \ge 1 with C<ι(m)C < \iota(m). So N1N_1 and NN_\infty are not equivalent, and [A1] is false.

step 3.1A1L6
5.1

The claim [A1] is therefore false, and the true statement in its neighbourhood is For n1n \ge 1 all norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent, whose proof spends compactness of the Euclidean unit sphere, a property step 2.4 shows VV has no analogue of.

step 4.1step 2.4A1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 171 results over 31 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources