Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: all norms on a real vector space are equivalent

Statement

False claim: any two norms on a real vector space are equivalent (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics).

What is true is the same statement for Rn with n a natural number, which is For n≥1 all norms on Rn are equivalent. Dropping the hypothesis that the space is one of the Rn makes the claim false, and the witness below is built from published material only.

The witness. Let RN be the function space of all functions N→R with pointwise operations (The vector space FX of all functions X→F with pointwise operations, and Fn as the case X=n={0,1,…,n−1}), and let

V  :=  { v∈RN  :  there is K∈N with vj=0 for every j≥K }

be the set of finitely supported sequences. On V define

N1(v):=∑j<K∣vj∣,N∞(v):=max⁡{ ∣vj∣:j<K },

for any K≥1 with vj=0 for j≥K. Both are norms on V, both values are independent of the admissible K chosen, and no real C satisfies N1≤C N∞ on V.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The space RN, the subset V, the functions N1 and N∞ above, and, for m≥1, the vector u(m)∈V with uj(m)=1 for j<m and uj(m)=0 for j≥m. For i∈N, ei∈RN is the function with ei(i)=1 and ei(j)=0 for j≠i.

[A1]

The refuted claim: any two norms on a real vector space are equivalent.

[L3]

Laws of finite sums (Laws of finite sums and finite products, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion): additivity, scaling, splitting, monotonicity, a sum of nonnegative terms is nonnegative, a vanishing sum of nonnegative terms has all terms 0, and ∑j<m1=ι(m).

[L4]

Maxima (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set): a nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum, which belongs to it and bounds it above.

[L5]

Absolute value (Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value, The triangle inequality): ∣t∣≥0; ∣t∣=0 exactly when t=0; ∣st∣=∣s∣∣t∣; ∣s+t∣≤∣s∣+∣t∣.

[L8]

Norm equivalence: M and N are equivalent when cM≤N≤CM for some reals c,C>0 (Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics); the norm axioms are (N1), (N2), (N3) (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms); and induction (The principle of mathematical induction).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

V is a linear subspace of RN, hence a real vector space: it contains 0, and if vj=0 for j≥K and wj=0 for j≥K′ then (λv+w)j=0 for j≥max⁡{K,K′}.

L1L4
1.2

The values N1(v) and N∞(v) do not depend on the admissible K. If K≤K′ are both admissible, then splitting the sum gives ∑j<K′∣vj∣=∑j<K∣vj∣+∑j=KK′−1∣vj∣, and the second part is a sum of zeros; and max⁡{∣vj∣:j<K′}=max⁡{∣vj∣:j<K} because the extra entries are 0 and the maximum over j<K is ≥∣v0∣≥0.

L3L4L5
1.3

The hypothesis that fails is finite-dimensionality. For every p∈N the set { ei:i<p } is a subset of V with p elements, the map i↦ei being injective because ei(i)=1≠0=ei′(i) for i≠i′; and it is linearly independent, since for an injective list l↦eil into it and scalars λ, evaluating ∑l<qλleil=0 at the point il0 gives λl0=0, the list l↦λleil(il0) vanishing off the single index l0.

L2L3L5
2.1

N1 is a norm on V. (N1): N1(v)=0 forces every ∣vj∣=0 for j<K, hence v=0; and N1(0)=0. (N2): λv is admissible with the same K and ∑j<K∣λvj∣=∣λ∣∑j<K∣vj∣. (N3): with K admissible for both v and w, ∑j<K∣vj+wj∣≤∑j<K∣vj∣+∑j<K∣wj∣ termwise.

step 1.2L3L5L8
2.2

N∞ is a norm on V. (N1): N∞(v)=0 forces ∣vj∣≤0 and ≥0 for every j<K, hence v=0. (N2): max⁡{∣λvj∣}=∣λ∣max⁡{∣vj∣}, since ∣λ∣∣vj∣≤∣λ∣N∞(v) for every j with equality at an index attaining the maximum. (N3): ∣vj+wj∣≤∣vj∣+∣wj∣≤N∞(v)+N∞(w) for every j<K, and the maximum on the left is one of those numbers.

step 1.2L4L5L8
2.3

For m≥1 the vector u(m) lies in V, and K=m is admissible for it; so N1(u(m))=∑j<m1=ι(m) and N∞(u(m))=max⁡{1,…,1}=1.

step 1.2L3L4L5
2.4

So V has no finite basis: a basis B with q elements would span V, forcing every linearly independent subset to have at most q elements, while step 1.3 produces one with q+1. Hence V is infinite-dimensional, and For n≥1 all norms on Rn are equivalent, which is a statement about Rn for a natural n, does not apply to it.

step 1.3L7
3.1

Suppose N1 and N∞ were equivalent, so that in particular N1(v)≤C N∞(v) for every v∈V and some real C>0. Then ι(m)≤C for every m≥1, by step 2.3.

step 2.3L8
4.1

That contradicts the Archimedean property, which supplies a natural m≥1 with C<ι(m). So N1 and N∞ are not equivalent, and [A1] is false.

step 3.1A1L6
5.1

The claim [A1] is therefore false, and the true statement in its neighbourhood is For n≥1 all norms on Rn are equivalent, whose proof spends compactness of the Euclidean unit sphere, a property step 2.4 shows V has no analogue of.

step 4.1step 2.4A1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources