Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bishop gromov volume ratio is nondecreasing under a ricci lower bound

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. False claim: if (M,g) is a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension n≥2 with Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g for a real number k, p∈M and Vk⋆ is the saturated model ball volume, then the Bishop–Gromov ratio Rp(r)=vol⁡g(B(p,r))Vk⋆(r),r>0, is nondecreasing on (0,∞). The claim is refuted below by an explicit manifold satisfying the Ricci lower bound on which the ratio strictly decreases; the correct statement is the opposite monotonicity, as asserted by Bishop gromov volume comparison.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inherited ACω of [A1]; the unit round sphere S1n⊆Rn+1 of dimension n≥2 with the induced Riemannian metric g; a point p∈S1n; the constant k=0 and the saturated model volume V0⋆; and the Bishop–Gromov ratio Rp(r)=vol⁡g(B(p,r))/V0⋆(r) of the false claim.

[A1]

The countable-choice premise is the inherited ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), carried by the sphere, cut-locus and Bishop–Gromov suppliers below.

[F1]

Round sphere (The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature, Round sphere model geometry, Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature, Ricci curvature): for k=1 and radius R=1 the sphere S1n has constant sectional curvature 1, so the curvature four-tensor is Rm⁡(X,Y,Z,W)=g(Y,Z)g(X,W)−g(X,Z)g(Y,W); tracing Ric⁡(X,Y)=∑iRm⁡(ei,X,Y,ei) in an orthonormal basis (e1,…,en) gives Ric⁡(X,Y)=∑i(g(X,Y)g(ei,ei)−g(ei,Y)g(X,ei))=(n−1)g(X,Y), that is Ric⁡=(n−1)g. By the round-sphere model proposition the sphere S1n is complete, connected and boundaryless of dimension n≥2, with diameter π. In particular Ric⁡=(n−1)g≥0=(n−1)⋅0⋅g, so the Ricci lower bound of the false claim holds with k=0, and the centre p is unrestricted.

[F2]

Diameter and large balls (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space): every q∈S1n satisfies dg(p,q)≤diam⁡(S1n,g)=π, and therefore B(p,r)=S1n for every r>π.

[F3]

Finite volume (For n≥1, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density, Riemannian volume density): S1n is a closed and bounded subset of Rn+1, hence compact; the Riemannian volume vol⁡g is compact-finite, so vol⁡g(S1n)<+∞. Consequently vol⁡g(B(p,r))≤vol⁡g(S1n)<+∞ for every r>0.

[F4]

Bishop–Gromov with k=0 (Bishop gromov volume comparison): on S1n, which satisfies Ric⁡≥0, the ratio Rp is well defined on (0,∞), is nonincreasing there, and lim⁡r↓0Rp(r)=1.

[F5]

Model volume for k=0 (Model space radial area and ball volume, Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions): V0⋆(r)=V0(r)=ωn−1∫0rsn⁡0(t)n−1 dt=ωn−1∫0rtn−1 dt with ωn−1>0 the total surface measure of the unit sphere; for r≥1 the integrand satisfies tn−1≥1, so V0⋆(r)≥ωn−1(r−1) and V0⋆(r)→+∞ as r→+∞.

Refutation

Proof technique: direct: take the unit round sphere with k=0, where the Ricci lower bound holds; the ratio tends to one at the origin but to zero at infinity because the ball volume saturates at the finite total volume while the Euclidean model volume grows without bound; two such radii violate monotonicity.

1.1F1F3F5

The witness satisfies the hypothesis. [F1] The unit sphere S1n is complete, connected, boundaryless and of dimension n≥2, and its Ricci curvature is Ric⁡=(n−1)g≥0, which is the lower bound Ric⁡≥(n−1)kg at k=0 [F1]. The ratio Rp(r)=vol⁡g(B(p,r))/V0⋆(r) is defined for every r>0 because V0⋆(r)>0 [F5] and the ball volume is finite [F3].

1.2F2F3F4F5

The ratio tends to 1 at the origin and to 0 at infinity. [F2, F3, F4, F5] Near the origin, lim⁡r↓0Rp(r)=1 by [F4]. At infinity, [F2] gives B(p,r)=S1n for every r>π, so Rp(r)=vol⁡g(S1n)V0⋆(r)(r>π); here the numerator is finite by [F3] and the denominator satisfies V0⋆(r)≥ωn−1(r−1)→+∞ by [F5], whence lim⁡r→+∞Rp(r)=0.

2.1F4step 1.1step 1.2∎

The ratio is not nondecreasing. [step 1.2] Choose r1>0 with Rp(r1)>12, possible because lim⁡r↓0Rp(r)=1; then choose r2>max⁡{r1,π} with Rp(r2)<12, possible because lim⁡r→+∞Rp(r)=0. Then 0<r1<r2 while Rp(r1)>Rp(r2), so the ratio is not nondecreasing on (0,∞). The manifold satisfies every hypothesis of the false claim (step 1.1), so the claim is false; the correct monotonicity is the nonincreasing one asserted by [F4], and the failure here is precisely the saturation of the ball volume at the finite total volume of the compact sphere against the unbounded Euclidean model volume. No direction or radius family beyond the two explicit radii r1,r2 is selected, so the inherited ACω of [A1] is not drawn on beyond its declaration.

Source locator

Datar §§27.2 and 28.1, pp.200–209, and Eschenburg §§4–5, pp.15–20, prove that the Bishop–Gromov ratio is nonincreasing, with value one at the origin and saturation once the ball exhausts the manifold. The witness is the unit round sphere at k=0, read off from the published round-sphere curvature and the round-sphere model proposition recording completeness and diameter π; the Ricci trace is computed above from the constant-curvature tensor identity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources