How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bishop gromov volume ratio is nondecreasing under a ricci lower bound
Statement
Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice . False claim: if is a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension with for a real number , and is the saturated model ball volume, then the Bishop–Gromov ratio is nondecreasing on . The claim is refuted below by an explicit manifold satisfying the Ricci lower bound on which the ratio strictly decreases; the correct statement is the opposite monotonicity, as asserted by Bishop gromov volume comparison.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inherited of [A1]; the unit round sphere of dimension with the induced Riemannian metric ; a point ; the constant and the saturated model volume ; and the Bishop–Gromov ratio of the false claim.
The countable-choice premise is the inherited (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), carried by the sphere, cut-locus and Bishop–Gromov suppliers below.
Round sphere (The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature, Round sphere model geometry, Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature, Ricci curvature): for and radius the sphere has constant sectional curvature , so the curvature four-tensor is ; tracing in an orthonormal basis gives , that is . By the round-sphere model proposition the sphere is complete, connected and boundaryless of dimension , with diameter . In particular , so the Ricci lower bound of the false claim holds with , and the centre is unrestricted.
Diameter and large balls (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space): every satisfies , and therefore for every .
Finite volume (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact, Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density, Riemannian volume density): is a closed and bounded subset of , hence compact; the Riemannian volume is compact-finite, so . Consequently for every .
Bishop–Gromov with (Bishop gromov volume comparison): on , which satisfies , the ratio is well defined on , is nonincreasing there, and .
Model volume for (Model space radial area and ball volume, Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions): with the total surface measure of the unit sphere; for the integrand satisfies , so and as .
Refutation
Proof technique: direct: take the unit round sphere with , where the Ricci lower bound holds; the ratio tends to one at the origin but to zero at infinity because the ball volume saturates at the finite total volume while the Euclidean model volume grows without bound; two such radii violate monotonicity.
The witness satisfies the hypothesis. [F1] The unit sphere is complete, connected, boundaryless and of dimension , and its Ricci curvature is , which is the lower bound at [F1]. The ratio is defined for every because [F5] and the ball volume is finite [F3].
The ratio tends to at the origin and to at infinity. [F2, F3, F4, F5] Near the origin, by [F4]. At infinity, [F2] gives for every , so here the numerator is finite by [F3] and the denominator satisfies by [F5], whence .
The ratio is not nondecreasing. [step 1.2] Choose with , possible because ; then choose with , possible because . Then while , so the ratio is not nondecreasing on . The manifold satisfies every hypothesis of the false claim (step 1.1), so the claim is false; the correct monotonicity is the nonincreasing one asserted by [F4], and the failure here is precisely the saturation of the ball volume at the finite total volume of the compact sphere against the unbounded Euclidean model volume. No direction or radius family beyond the two explicit radii is selected, so the inherited of [A1] is not drawn on beyond its declaration.
Source locator
Datar §§27.2 and 28.1, pp.200–209, and Eschenburg §§4–5, pp.15–20, prove that the Bishop–Gromov ratio is nonincreasing, with value one at the origin and saturation once the ball exhausts the manifold. The witness is the unit round sphere at , read off from the published round-sphere curvature and the round-sphere model proposition recording completeness and diameter ; the Ricci trace is computed above from the constant-curvature tensor identity.
Depends on
- Bishop gromov volume comparison
- Model space radial area and ball volume
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions
- The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature
- Round sphere model geometry
- Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature
- Ricci curvature
- For $n\ge1$, every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact
- Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density
- Riemannian volume density
- Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-H. Eschenburg, Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)