How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A self-transverse immersion has no double points when
Statement
Assume . Let be a self-transverse immersion with . Then , so is injective. No properness or compactness of is used; in particular self-transversality, not genericity, is the hypothesis.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and a self-transverse immersion with .
For a self-transverse immersion , if then and (The double point locus has the expected dimension ).
Transverse maps , with have empty fibre product; in particular transverse embedded submanifolds whose dimensions sum to less than the ambient dimension do not meet (Negative expected dimension forces empty generic intersections).
Countable choice is inherited from the transversality machinery used in [L1] and [L2]; this proof selects nothing (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The hypothesis is , so clause 2 of [L1] applies to the self-transverse immersion and gives and . The negative expected dimension is the instance of [L2] for the transverse pair , whose source dimensions and sum to less than the target dimension exactly when .
By [F1] an element of is a pair of distinct points with equal image; since there are no such pairs, hence implies , that is, is injective.
Therefore every self-transverse immersion from an -manifold into an -manifold with is injective, without any compactness or properness hypothesis and with self-transversality in place of genericity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- C. T. C. Wall, Differential Topology (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 156, Cambridge University Press 2016; full text retrieved from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine snapshot of the ETH Zürich course copy), Chapter 6 §§6.2–6.4, printed pp. 169–192 (Theorem 6.2.1; Propositions 6.3.1 and 6.3.3; Theorems 6.3.2, 6.3.4, 6.3.6, 6.4.5, 6.4.8 and 6.4.9; Lemma 6.3.5) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Arkadiy Skopenkov, Embedding and Knotting of Manifolds in Euclidean Spaces (arXiv:math/0604045), §1, article pp. 2–5 (self-intersection set; ambient versus non-ambient isotopy) and §2, article pp. 6–14 (Theorems 2.1–2.3 and 2.8; the modulo 2 and integral Whitney obstruction; the Whitney invariant); §3 and §5 used only for the recorded knotting boundary (standard reference, not scraped)