Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A closed three-manifold with H_1 = Z/2 and H_2 = 0 does not embed in S^4

Statement

Assume AC. Let M be a closed connected oriented smooth three-manifold with integral homology H1(M)=Z/2, H2(M)=0 and H3(M)=Z. Then M admits no smooth embedding into S4, and hence none into R4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and M as stated; all homology and cohomology below use integral coefficients.

[F1]

For a nonempty proper compact locally contractible K⊂S4, Alexander duality gives H~i(S4∖K)≅H~3−i(K) (Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere).

[F2]

UCT gives 0→Ext⁡Z1(Hr−1(X),Z)→Hr(X)→Hom⁡(Hr(X),Z)→0 (Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology).

[F3]

Mayer–Vietoris applies to open covers, sphere homology is zero in degrees one and two, and deformation retractions induce homology isomorphisms (Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology, Homology of spheres, Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology).

[F4]

A closed smooth submanifold has a tubular neighbourhood under countable choice; AC supplies countable choice (The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4givenconstruct

Suppose M⊂S4 is smoothly embedded. Its normal line is oriented by the orientations of M and S4, and has a global positive unit section: in an oriented local line frame the positive unit vector is independent of the frame, so these sections glue. Compactness and [F4] give a product tube M×(−ϵ,ϵ). By [F2], H3(M)=Z, since H2(M)=0 and H3(M)=Z. Thus [F1] gives H~0(S4∖M)=Z. The complement is an open manifold and is locally path connected; H0 is free on its path components, so it has exactly two components U,V. Every component has nonempty frontier in M, since otherwise it is both open and closed in connected S4. Near any frontier point a hypersurface chart has exactly two connected local sides. Each of the two global halves of the product tube is connected because M is connected. Every complementary component meets one of them, by the local side chart at a frontier point. Therefore the two tube halves lie in distinct components, one in U and one in V. Their closures A=U‾ and B=V‾ are compact smooth manifolds with common boundary M, are locally contractible, and satisfy S4=A∪B and A∩B=M.

2.1F3step 1.1construct

Enlarge A and B by a small portion of the opposite tube half to obtain an open cover of S4. The two open sets retract onto A,B, and their intersection retracts onto M, by moving the collar coordinate linearly to zero on the added halves. Also U↪A and V↪B are homotopy equivalences: a collar map which moves coordinate s≥0 slightly into s>0, and equals s outside a smaller collar, is homotopic to the identity by linear interpolation and supplies homotopy inverses for the interior inclusions. Applying [F3] to the open cover, the segments H2(M)→H2(A)⊕H2(B)→H2(S4) and H2(S4)→H1(M)→H1(A)⊕H1(B)→H1(S4) show H2(A)=H2(B)=0 and H1(A)⊕H1(B)≅Z/2. Hence one of H1(A),H1(B) is zero and the other is Z/2.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Since S4∖A=V, applying [F1] to A and then the interior equivalence in step 2.1 gives H1(B)≅H1(V)≅H2(A). By [F2] and H2(A)=0, this equals Ext⁡Z1(H1(A),Z). The latter is zero if H1(A)=0 and is Z/2 if H1(A)=Z/2: for the second calculation use the free resolution 0→Z→2Z→Z/2→0, whose dual has cokernel Z/2. Thus H1(A) and H1(B) are simultaneously zero or simultaneously Z/2, contradicting step 2.1. No smooth embedding in S4 exists. Composing a putative embedding in R4 with inverse stereographic projection would give one in S4, proving the last assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources