Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Principal-branch generating function for backward-Euler convolution quadrature

Statement

Let 0<α<1 and let (ωj)j≥0 be the weights defined by Backward-Euler convolution quadrature for a Caputo equation. Then the complex power series

W(z):=∑j=0∞ωjzj

converges absolutely for every z in the open unit disc D={z∈C:∣z∣<1}, and W(z)=(1−z)Log⁡α(z∈D), where the right side is the principal-branch power from Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch. It is well-defined there because 1−z lies in the principal-logarithm slit plane.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<α<1 and the backward-Euler CQ coefficient recurrence.

[F1]

Backward-Euler convolution quadrature for a Caputo equation: ω0=1 and ωj=((j−1−α)/j)ωj−1 for j≥1.

[F3]

Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence: the radius of a complex power series is the radius of its real modulus series. Inside its disc of convergence a complex power series is holomorphic and may be differentiated term by term: inside its disc of convergence, the sum is holomorphic.

[F8]

Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch: zLog⁡α=exp⁡(αLog⁡z) on the principal-logarithm slit plane. The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane: the principal logarithm is holomorphic there.

[F9]

The chain rule for complex derivatives, The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, and Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives: compositions of complex differentiable maps are complex differentiable, the exponential is entire, and affine maps are holomorphic.

[F10]

On positive reals, the principal branch power agrees with the published real power: on positive real bases, principal-branch powers agree with real powers.

[F11]

Identity theorem for holomorphic functions: two holomorphic functions on a complex domain that agree on a set with an interior accumulation point agree throughout the domain.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

The recurrence [F1] gives ∣ω0∣=1, ω1=−α with ∣ω1∣=α<1, and for j≥2 gives ωj=((j−1−α)/j)ωj−1 with 0<(j−1−α)/j<1, so induction yields ∣ωj∣≤1 for all j. For each 0≤r<1, [F2] bounds ∑j≥0∣ωj∣rj by a convergent geometric series; the radius definition [F3] therefore gives radius at least 1, and the complex series sum W is holomorphic on D by [F3].

1.2givenF1F4F5F6algebra

For real x∈(−1,1) the same coefficients define a real power series of radius at least 1; termwise differentiation [F4] gives W′(x)=∑j≥0(j+1)ωj+1xj. By [F1], (j+1)ωj+1=(j−α)ωj, hence W′(x)=∑j≥0(j−α)ωjxj=xW′(x)−αW(x) and (1−x)W′(x)=−αW(x). Since 1−x>0, [F5] gives H′(x)=0 for H(x):=W(x)(1−x)−α; [F6] makes H constant, and H(0)=ω0=1, so W(x)=(1−x)α throughout (−1,1).

1.3givenF8F9F12construct

Fix z∈D. If 1−z were real r≤0, then z=1−r≥1 would be positive real, so [F12] would give ∣z∣=z≥1, a contradiction. Thus 1−z is in the slit plane and P(z):=(1−z)Log⁡α is defined; [F8] makes the principal logarithm holomorphic there, and [F9] with the branch definition makes P holomorphic on D.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3F7F10F11∎

By [F7] the unit disc is a complex domain. For every real x∈(−1,1), [F10] identifies P(x) with (1−x)α, so step 1.2 gives P(x)=W(x). The agreement set contains an interval accumulating at 0∈D; since W and P are holomorphic by steps 1.1 and 1.3, the identity theorem [F11] gives W=P throughout D, including z=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

126 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources