How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fourier transform of the three-dimensional plane Poisson kernel
Statement
For and , let Then has integral one and, under the negative-sign Fourier convention,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), , the displayed kernel, and the Fourier convention.
Countable Choice is assumed for the Fourier and polar-measure constructions (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The Fourier transform is a bounded function, agrees with the distributional transform, and sends a second distributional derivative to multiplication by (Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms, Fourier differentiation and multiplication identities on tempered distributions).
In dimension two the angular measure in [F90] has mass : the parametrization , , has unit speed and covers the circle except one surface-null point. Thus for nonnegative radial . The parametrization and one-variable integrations use the sine/cosine derivatives and FTC. (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then )
Polar integration uses the published radial formula, not a linear substitution: . The sphere measure agrees with graph-chart surface measure and scales by . (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure)
Proof
In polar coordinates, ; the same estimate shows . Direct differentiation of gives for .
Put . For in any compact subinterval of , and its first two -derivatives are dominated by integrable radial functions, so differentiation under the Fourier integral is valid. Fourier transforming the harmonic identity in step 1.1 and using [F1] gives . Also . For fixed , the change gives ; dominated convergence yields as . The solutions of this constant-coefficient ODE are linear combinations of and when ; boundedness removes the growing term, and the boundary limit fixes the coefficient to one. When , the bounded affine solutions are constant and the same limit gives one. Hence .
Depends on
- Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms
- Fourier differentiation and multiplication identities on tempered distributions
- A linear map $T$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with $\lambda_n(T[E])=|\det T|\,\lambda_n(E)$ when $T$ is invertible and $T[E]$ Lebesgue null when it is not
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure
- The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Francisco-Javier Sayas, First Steps in the Boundary Element Method (2015 lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Martin Costabel, Boundary Integral Operators on Lipschitz Domains: Elementary Results (1988) (standard reference, not scraped)