Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous local sections for disk point evaluation

Statement

Let D2⊆R2 be the closed unit disc, let Qn=(q1,…,qn) be the fixed base configuration of Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk, and let

ev⁡:Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2)⟶Cn(int⁡D2),ev⁡(h):=[h(q1),…,h(qn)],

be the evaluation map into the unordered configuration space (Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X)), with the compact-open topology on the homeomorphism group. Then:

  1. ev⁡ is surjective for every n≥0, including n=0;
  2. every ξ∈Cn(int⁡D2) has an open neighbourhood U and a continuous map s:U→Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2) with ev⁡∘s=id⁡U.

No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The closed unit disc D2, the fixed pairwise distinct base points q1,…,qn∈int⁡D2, and the evaluation map ev⁡.

[L1]

If (X,d) is a nonempty complete metric space and f:X→X satisfies d(f(u),f(v))≤q d(u,v) for all u,v with 0≤q<1, then f has exactly one fixed point (A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point).

[L2]

For every m≥1 the Euclidean space (Rm,d2) is a complete metric space (R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R).

[L3]

On C(X,Y) with X a nonempty compact metric space and Y a metric space the compact-open topology equals the topology of uniform convergence (On a nonempty compact metric domain, the compact-open topology is the uniform topology).

[L4]

For a nonempty connected Hausdorff topological d-manifold M with d≥2 the quotient map p:Fn(M)→Cn(M) is a covering map whose fibres have n! elements, and both Fn(M) and Cn(M) are path-connected (Ordered configuration spaces cover the unordered ones regularly with deck group Sn).

[L5]

A covering map has an evenly covered neighbourhood of every point of its base, and each sheet of such a neighbourhood maps homeomorphically onto it (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).

[L6]

Fn(X) is the subspace of Xn of tuples with pairwise distinct coordinates, and Cn(X)=Fn(X)/Sn with [x]:=Sn⋅x (an orbit of ordered tuples) (Ordered configuration spaces Fn(X), Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X)).

[L7]

Elements of Cn(X) correspond bijectively to the n-element subsets of X, the inverse passing from a subset to the orbit of one of its enumerations (Unordered configuration spaces Cn(X)).

Proof

technique · direct

If n=0, the base C0(int⁡D2) is a point and the constant section at the identity proves both claims. Assume n≥1 for the remaining steps.

1.1L1L2L3

Small displacements give boundary-fixed homeomorphisms. Fix an ordered configuration y=(y1,…,yn)∈Fn(int⁡D2). Put d:=1−max⁡i∥yi∥2>0, let η:=min⁡i<j∥yi−yj∥2 if n≥2 and η:=1 if n=1, and set ρ:=min⁡(η,d)/3>0. Choose Lipschitz functions χi:R2→[0,1] with χi=1 on a neighbourhood of yi, supp⁡χi contained in the open ball of radius ρ about yi, and a common Lipschitz constant C/ρ; the supports are pairwise disjoint and lie in int⁡D2, the latter because ρ≤d/3 leaves a positive margin to the boundary. For z=(z1,…,zn) with vi:=zi−yi satisfying ∑i∥vi∥2<ρ/(2C), put hy,z(w):=w+∑iχi(w)vi. Then the displacement φ:=hy,z−id⁡ is Lipschitz with constant at most ∑iC∥vi∥2/ρ<1/2<1, so for every w′∈R2 the map w↦w′−φ(w) is a contraction of the complete space R2 and [L1] and [L2] give it a unique fixed point; the resulting inverse is Lipschitz, since ∥hy,z(u)−hy,z(v)∥2≥(1−Lip⁡(φ))∥u−v∥2, and is a two-sided inverse of hy,z, and it shows simultaneously that hy,z is bijective with continuous inverse, hence a homeomorphism. Since hy,z is the identity outside int⁡D2, bijectivity prevents an interior point from mapping outside the disc; thus it restricts to a homeomorphism of D2 and fixes ∂D2 pointwise, and hy,z(yi)=yi+vi=zi because χi=1 near yi and χj(yi)=0 for j≠i. Moreover, if z(k)→z with all members admissible, then sup⁡w∥hy,z(k)(w)−hy,z(w)∥2≤∑i∥vi(k)−vi∥2→0, so z↦hy,z is continuous for the topology of uniform convergence, which on D2 is the compact-open topology by [L3].

1.2L4L5L6

Local order of an unordered configuration. By [L4] the quotient p:Fn(int⁡D2)→Cn(int⁡D2) is a covering map with path-connected total space and base. Given ξ∈Cn(int⁡D2) and a chosen preimage x∈Fn(int⁡D2) with [x]=ξ, [L5] supplies an evenly covered open U∋ξ and the sheet through x gives a continuous local section σ:U→Fn(int⁡D2) with σ(ξ)=x and p∘σ=id⁡U; the passage from an unordered configuration to one of its enumerations is a single selection from a nonempty set and costs no choice.

2.1L4L6L7step 1.1

Evaluation is surjective. Let ξ∈Cn(int⁡D2) and by [L7] choose x=(x1,…,xn)∈Fn(int⁡D2) with [x]=ξ. By the path-connectedness in [L4] and the compactness of [0,1] choose a path β:[0,1]→Fn(int⁡D2) with β(0)=Qn and β(1)=x together with a finite partition 0=t0<t1<⋯<tm=1 such that for every k the configurations y:=β(tk−1), z:=β(tk) satisfy the admissibility bound of step 1.1; this partition exists because the configurations along a path stay at a positive distance from one another and from the boundary and both quantities are uniformly continuous on the compact interval. Put g:=hβ(tm−1),β(tm)∘⋯∘hβ(t0),β(t1); by step 1.1 each factor is a homeomorphism of D2 fixing ∂D2, so g is one too, and g(qi)=xi for every i. Hence ev⁡(g)=[x]=ξ, which proves surjectivity.

3.1L3L5L6step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Continuous local sections. Fix ξ0∈Cn(int⁡D2) and, using step 2.1, choose g0∈Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2) with ev⁡(g0)=ξ0; write x0:=(g0(q1),…,g0(qn))∈Fn(int⁡D2), so [x0]=ξ0. Let U and σ be the evenly covered neighbourhood and local section of step 1.2 through x0, so that σ(ξ0)=x0, and set s(ξ):=hx0,σ(ξ)∘g0(ξ∈U). Shrink U to the open neighbourhood on which the displacement bound of step 1.1 holds; this is possible because σ is continuous and σ(ξ0)=x0. Then s is well defined on all of this smaller U; it is continuous as a composite of the continuous maps σ, z↦hx0,z and right composition with the fixed homeomorphism g0. Finally ev⁡(s(ξ))=[σ(ξ)]=ξ by step 1.1 and p∘σ=id⁡U, so s is the required continuous local section.

Remarks

  • The local point-motion formula is the only metric input: a sufficiently small displacement supported in disjoint discs is a bounded perturbation of the identity of Lipschitz constant below one, and Banach's theorem turns it into a homeomorphism of the disc fixing the boundary.
  • The supports lie strictly inside int⁡D2, so no step moves the boundary circle; this is what makes every constructed map an element of Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2).
  • The n=0 case is the constant section handled before step 1.1. For n=1, pairwise separation is vacuous and the auxiliary value η=1 keeps ρ positive.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources