How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Clean block-sparse Gaussian covariance has squared operator lower rate s log(ep/s) over n
Statement
Assume AC. Fix and integers . There are constants such that if , then The infimum is over Borel maps . This is the single-common-block class, not a row-sparsity class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , integers and , and clean iid observations with law for an unknown .
Single-block sparse covariance class and restricted directions: all off-diagonal entries of a candidate covariance lie in one common block of size at most .
Kullback–Leibler divergence between nondegenerate centered Gaussian laws: the KL divergence between positive-definite centered Gaussian laws is .
Additivity of KL divergence for finite product laws: KL divergence of finite product laws is the sum of the component divergences.
Fano’s packing bound with a reference-distribution KL bound: for a uniform finite family with pairwise target separation in a metric space and reference law , the average squared-metric risk of any estimator kernel is at least , where . A classifier with the discrete metric has risk equal to its error probability.
Pinsker’s inequality with event-supremum total variation: under the event-supremum total-variation convention, .
Two-point Le Cam lower bound for squared-error risk: for two scalar targets at distance , every estimator has maximum squared-error risk at least . With binary targets and binary actions, this is a testing-error lower bound.
A measurable function between measurable spaces, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Randomized procedures as probability kernels, The Dirac set function at a point, and A Dirac set function is a probability measure: a Borel finite-valued classifier defines a deterministic probability kernel by its Dirac law.
Proof
Suppose and . For , let , where . These matrices are diagonal, so [F1] places them in . Since , choose so their largest eigenvalue is at most . Their pairwise operator distance is . Relative to , [F2] and give The inequality follows by integrating from to . By [F3], each -sample KL is at most .
The remaining case with is . Let and , where . The sample-size condition and small make both matrices members of . With , [F2] gives The derivative of the bracket is , proving the inequality. By [F3], choose small enough that the -sample KL is at most . Pinsker [F5] gives total variation at most ; [F6] then gives maximum binary testing error at least . A wrong nearest covariance decision forces error at least , and its decision cells are Borel by finite distance comparisons, so [F7] gives an admissible test kernel. Thus one law has probability at least of squared error at least , which is the required rate.
Suppose , and put and . Since , . Partition of the coordinates other than coordinate into disjoint groups of size . For each word , select its indexed coordinate in every group and form the unit vector with value on those coordinates and zero elsewhere. There are words. Greedily retain a word and delete its Hamming ball of radius . Each ball has at most words. To obtain the binomial sum bound, put ; in , each weight for is at least , and .
Use the diagonal matrices from step 1.1 as the packing and as reference. Choose so their average KL is at most . The Fano factor for , so [F4] gives classification error greater than . Classify an estimator by its nearest covariance, resolving ties by least index. This rule is Borel because its decision cells are finite intersections of strict or weak comparisons of continuous distances, and [F7] turns it into a deterministic test kernel. If it is misclassified, the triangle inequality forces operator error at least . Thus the supremum tail probability is greater than at threshold . Because , , giving the required rate after reducing if needed.
The retained code has pairwise Hamming distance greater than and Here and . Also because and for . Thus , and . Further : if , then and no word is removed by a radius-zero ball; if , the displayed bound gives . Distinct code vectors satisfy .
Define , where . The off-diagonal entries lie in the block formed by coordinate and the selected coordinates, so by [F1]. The perturbation has eigenvalues on and zero on its orthogonal complement. Choose , so ; then every is positive definite and has top eigenvalue at most . For distinct codewords,
Let . The relative perturbation has eigenvalues and zero otherwise. By [F2], The scalar inequality follows by integrating from to . By [F3], the -sample KL to is at most . Since , choose so this KL is at most .
The Fano factor obeys Thus [F4] gives every classifier error greater than . Nearest-covariance classification from any estimator is wrong only when its operator error is at least half the separation from step 3.1, hence at least . The finite nearest-code rule is Borel by finite distance comparisons, so [F7] makes it a classifier kernel. The supremum tail probability at threshold is therefore greater than , proving the rate for .
Choose and . The bounds from steps 2.1, 1.2, and 5.1 cover the cases , , and , respectively, and give probability at least at threshold . Taking the infimum over estimators and combining the cases proves the claim.
Depends on
- Single-block sparse covariance class and restricted directions
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis
- The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||
- The Frobenius norm $\lVert A\rVert_F=(\sum_{i,j}|a_{ij}|^2)^{1/2}$ on real or complex matrices
- Spectral and Frobenius norms are unitarily invariant, are given by singular values, and satisfy the sharp rank comparison
- Kullback–Leibler divergence between nondegenerate centered Gaussian laws
- Pinsker’s inequality with event-supremum total variation
- Fano’s packing bound with a reference-distribution KL bound
- Additivity of KL divergence for finite product laws
- Two-point Le Cam lower bound for squared-error risk
- The Axiom of Choice
- A measurable function between measurable spaces
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- Randomized procedures as probability kernels
- The Dirac set function at a point
- A Dirac set function is a probability measure
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mengjie Chen, Chao Gao and Zhao Ren, Robust Covariance and Scatter Matrix Estimation under Huber's Contamination Model, proof of Theorem 3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Philippe Rigollet, 18.S997 High-Dimensional Statistics Lecture Notes, MIT OpenCourseWare, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)