Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complete local modular systems and integral idempotent lifting

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A=Z[v,v−1] and let θ:A→k be a unital homomorphism to a field. Set p=ker⁡θ, k0=Frac⁡(A/p)⊆k, and let R be the maximal-adic completion of Ap. Then R is a complete separated Noetherian local domain with residue field k0, and A→R is injective. Thus Q(v) embeds in F=Frac⁡R, and A→R→k0→k equals θ.

Every finite projective R-module is free, with equal fraction-field and residue-field dimensions. In every finite associative unital R-algebra C, every idempotent of C/mRC lifts to an idempotent of C. For any right C-module, multiplication by such an idempotent is an exact projection commuting with scalar extension. In particular, a filtration with finite free layers remains exact on its projected layers after passing to F or k0. If JR=⨁EMdE(R), every R-finite-free JR-module has the same simple multiplicities in its generic and residue fibres.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The homomorphism θ and the stated rings and modules. The Axiom of Choice is retained from the commutative-algebra suppliers.

[F1]

The Laurent ring Z[v,v−1] is a Noetherian domain; quotients and localizations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian, and a one-variable polynomial ring over a field is a PID (The Laurent polynomial ring is Noetherian and a unique factorisation domain, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, For every field F, F[x] is a principal ideal domain).

[F2]

A prime minimal over an n-generated ideal in a Noetherian ring has height at most n (Krull's height theorem).

[F3]

The completion of a Noetherian local ring is Noetherian local, complete and separated, with the same residue field, and the completion map is faithfully flat (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field). Completion preserves regularity, and a regular local ring is a domain (completion preserves regular local rings, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay).

[F4]

A finite module M over a local ring with mM=M is zero (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma). Every finite module over a complete Noetherian ring is complete for its maximal-adic topology (Finite modules over complete Noetherian rings are complete).

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Put B=Ap. It is a nonzero Noetherian local domain by [F1]. Its residue is Frac⁡(A/p): modulo p, the inverted elements are exactly the nonzero elements of A/p. This identifies that field with k0⊆k. Localizing a domain is injective. The elementary prime correspondence used below follows directly from fractions: a prime disjoint from the denominators extends to a prime, and contraction recovers it because a fraction belongs to the extended ideal exactly when its numerator does.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

If p∩Z=0, every nonzero integer is a unit in B, so fraction arithmetic identifies B with a prime localization of Q[v,v−1]. The latter is a PID: ideals in its localization are generated by the image of a generator of their contracted ideal in Q[v]. Thus B is a field or has a nonzero principal maximal ideal (a). In the second case [F2] and the chain (0)⊊(a) give dimension one. The class of a modulo (a)2 is nonzero, since a=a2b in the domain would imply 1=ab with a a nonunit. Hence its embedding dimension is one. In the field case both dimensions are zero. Thus B is regular in both cases.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1choosealgebra

Otherwise p∩Z=(ℓ) for a prime integer ℓ. The prime p/(ℓ) in the PID Fℓ[v,v−1] is zero or (f) for an irreducible Laurent polynomial f. If it is zero, p=(ℓ) and the principal-maximal-ideal argument of step 2.1 proves regularity. Otherwise choose a Laurent lift G of f; then the maximal ideal of B is m=(ℓ,G). The chain (0)⊊(ℓ)B⊊m and [F2] give dim⁡B=2. The quotient B/(ℓ) is the domain Fℓ[v,v−1](f). If ℓ=rℓ2+sℓG+tG2 in B, reduction modulo ℓ gives tˉf2=0, hence t=ℓt′. Cancellation of ℓ then gives 1=rℓ+sG+t′G2∈m, impossible. Thus ℓ∉m2. If aℓ+bG∈m2, reducing modulo ℓ gives bˉf∈(f2), so b∈m. It follows that aℓ∈m2, and ℓ∉m2 forces a∈m, since otherwise a is a unit. The two displayed generators therefore give a basis of m/m2; its dimension is two. Thus B is regular in this final case.

4.1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

By [F3], R=B^ is complete separated Noetherian local with residue k0, is regular, and is a domain. Faithful flatness makes B→R injective: if b maps to zero, flat tensoring the inclusion bB↪B gives an injection bB⊗BR↪R whose image is zero; faithfulness forces bB=0, so b=0. Therefore A↪R induces Q(v)↪F, with the required residue map. If p=0, this also covers the field B=R=Q(v) with zero maximal ideal.

5.1F4step 4.1choosealgebra

For a finite projective module P over any local ring, lift a basis of P/mP to r elements of P. Nakayama on the finite cokernel makes Rr→P surjective. Projectivity splits it as Rr=P⊕Q, with Q finite. Reduction of this direct sum shows Q/mQ=0, so Nakayama gives Q=0. Hence P is free of rank r. Over our domain this rank equals both dim⁡F(F⊗RP) and dim⁡k0(k0⊗RP).

5.2F4step 4.1constructalgebra

Let x0∈C lift an idempotent modulo mRC. Define δi=xi2−xi and xi+1=xi+(1−2xi)δi. All factors here are polynomials in xi, so integer-polynomial expansion gives δi+1=δi2(4δi−3). Thus δi∈mR2iC and xi+1−xi∈mR2iC. The finite-module completeness in [F4] gives a limit q≡x0 modulo mRC. Multiplication is continuous, since these ideal powers are two-sided ideals, so separatedness gives q2=q. This construction involves no division and works in every characteristic.

6.1step 5.1step 5.2algebra

For any right C-module X, the R-linear decomposition X=Xq⊕X(1−q) shows that projection X↦Xq commutes with every scalar extension. It is exact: under a surjection X→Y, lift y∈Y to x, and then xq lifts yq; kernels and injections follow by restriction of the same projection. If 0→Ii+1→Ii→Bi→0 is a filtration sequence, projection gives 0→Ii+1q→Iiq→Biq→0. When Bi is finite free, Biq is finite projective and hence free by step 5.1; the sequence splits as R-modules. It therefore retains its exact layer after scalar extension, including reduction to k0.

7.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra∎

Finally let JR=⨁EMdE(R) act on an R-finite-free module X. With matrix units eijE, put QE=e11EX. It is a direct summand of X, hence finite free by step 5.1. The map RdE⊗RQE→eEX sending ui⊗x to ei1Ex has inverse y↦∑iui⊗e1iEy, by the matrix-unit identities. Therefore the generic and residue multiplicities of the E-standard simple are both rank⁡RQE. This proves the final assertion and completes the lemma.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources