How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete local modular systems and integral idempotent lifting
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let and let be a unital homomorphism to a field. Set , , and let be the maximal-adic completion of . Then is a complete separated Noetherian local domain with residue field , and is injective. Thus embeds in , and equals .
Every finite projective -module is free, with equal fraction-field and residue-field dimensions. In every finite associative unital -algebra , every idempotent of lifts to an idempotent of . For any right -module, multiplication by such an idempotent is an exact projection commuting with scalar extension. In particular, a filtration with finite free layers remains exact on its projected layers after passing to or . If , every -finite-free -module has the same simple multiplicities in its generic and residue fibres.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The homomorphism and the stated rings and modules. The Axiom of Choice is retained from the commutative-algebra suppliers.
The Laurent ring is a Noetherian domain; quotients and localizations of Noetherian rings are Noetherian, and a one-variable polynomial ring over a field is a PID (The Laurent polynomial ring is Noetherian and a unique factorisation domain, Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, For every field , is a principal ideal domain).
A prime minimal over an -generated ideal in a Noetherian ring has height at most (Krull's height theorem).
The completion of a Noetherian local ring is Noetherian local, complete and separated, with the same residue field, and the completion map is faithfully flat (Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field). Completion preserves regularity, and a regular local ring is a domain (completion preserves regular local rings, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay).
A finite module over a local ring with is zero (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma). Every finite module over a complete Noetherian ring is complete for its maximal-adic topology (Finite modules over complete Noetherian rings are complete).
Proof
Put . It is a nonzero Noetherian local domain by [F1]. Its residue is : modulo , the inverted elements are exactly the nonzero elements of . This identifies that field with . Localizing a domain is injective. The elementary prime correspondence used below follows directly from fractions: a prime disjoint from the denominators extends to a prime, and contraction recovers it because a fraction belongs to the extended ideal exactly when its numerator does.
If , every nonzero integer is a unit in , so fraction arithmetic identifies with a prime localization of . The latter is a PID: ideals in its localization are generated by the image of a generator of their contracted ideal in . Thus is a field or has a nonzero principal maximal ideal . In the second case [F2] and the chain give dimension one. The class of modulo is nonzero, since in the domain would imply with a nonunit. Hence its embedding dimension is one. In the field case both dimensions are zero. Thus is regular in both cases.
Otherwise for a prime integer . The prime in the PID is zero or for an irreducible Laurent polynomial . If it is zero, and the principal-maximal-ideal argument of step 2.1 proves regularity. Otherwise choose a Laurent lift of ; then the maximal ideal of is . The chain and [F2] give . The quotient is the domain . If in , reduction modulo gives , hence . Cancellation of then gives , impossible. Thus . If , reducing modulo gives , so . It follows that , and forces , since otherwise is a unit. The two displayed generators therefore give a basis of ; its dimension is two. Thus is regular in this final case.
By [F3], is complete separated Noetherian local with residue , is regular, and is a domain. Faithful flatness makes injective: if maps to zero, flat tensoring the inclusion gives an injection whose image is zero; faithfulness forces , so . Therefore induces , with the required residue map. If , this also covers the field with zero maximal ideal.
For a finite projective module over any local ring, lift a basis of to elements of . Nakayama on the finite cokernel makes surjective. Projectivity splits it as , with finite. Reduction of this direct sum shows , so Nakayama gives . Hence is free of rank . Over our domain this rank equals both and .
Let lift an idempotent modulo . Define and . All factors here are polynomials in , so integer-polynomial expansion gives . Thus and . The finite-module completeness in [F4] gives a limit modulo . Multiplication is continuous, since these ideal powers are two-sided ideals, so separatedness gives . This construction involves no division and works in every characteristic.
For any right -module , the -linear decomposition shows that projection commutes with every scalar extension. It is exact: under a surjection , lift to , and then lifts ; kernels and injections follow by restriction of the same projection. If is a filtration sequence, projection gives . When is finite free, is finite projective and hence free by step 5.1; the sequence splits as -modules. It therefore retains its exact layer after scalar extension, including reduction to .
Finally let act on an -finite-free module . With matrix units , put . It is a direct summand of , hence finite free by step 5.1. The map sending to has inverse , by the matrix-unit identities. Therefore the generic and residue multiplicities of the -standard simple are both . This proves the final assertion and completes the lemma.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Laurent polynomial ring is Noetherian and a unique factorisation domain
- Every quotient and every localisation of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian
- For every field $F$, $F[x]$ is a principal ideal domain
- Krull's height theorem
- Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field
- completion preserves regular local rings
- regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma
- Finite modules over complete Noetherian rings are complete
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Meinolf Geck, Modular Representations of Hecke Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)