Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normalized cyclotomic functors give an integrable quantum action

Statement

For the standard graded quotient over arbitrary k and graded admissible Q, let h=⟨hi,Λ−β⟩. On projective K0 take Fi=Fibasic and Ei=qi1−hEibasic on input β+i to output β. On module G0 take the KK action Ei=Eibasic and Fi=qi1−hFibasic on input β; also the canonical action with the SAME shifts as projectives. The torus acts on root component β by Ka=q⟨a,Λ−β⟩. Each action satisfies all mixed relations, and Ei,Fi are locally nilpotent. After scalar extension to Q(q) these are integrable type-one Uq(g)-modules. This does not assert a decomposition into finite-dimensional full-g submodules and does not cover ungraded monic deformations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard cyclotomic quotient RΛ and its graded Grothendieck groups as in Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map; the basic functors and the projectivity results of Cyclotomic induction is projective on the right.

[F1]

The basic categorical commutator (The categorical sl2 commutator for cyclotomic KLR functors): qi−2FiEi⊕⨁k=0h−1qi2kId≅EiFi for h≥0, and its negative counterpart.

[F2]

The generic mixed relations (Generic KLR induction and restriction: mixed relations and the opposite-end exact sequence), with their unequal-color cyclotomic descent proved in the final step of The categorical sl2 commutator for cyclotomic KLR functors: for i≠j EiFj≅q−(αi∣αj)FjEi, and the equal-colour decomposition of [F1].

[F3]

Finite root strings and dot nilpotence (Cyclotomic dot annihilators, finite-dimensional blocks, and finite root strings): RΛ(β+nαi)=0 for n large, so Fin vanishes on each component; and the mixed-relations-to-integrable-action lemma (Mixed relations, local nilpotence and weights give the integrable quantum action).

Proof

Proof technique: compute the normalized operators on the two Grothendieck groups from the basic categorical commutator, check the mixed relations and local nilpotence, and apply the abstract integrability lemma.

1.1F3algebra

The normalized operators. Projectivity of the cyclotomic bimodules supplies exact functors preserving finite projectives, so the displayed shifts define A-linear operators on the graded Grothendieck groups, where A=Z[q,q−1]. The torus acts on the root component β by Ka=q⟨a,Λ−β⟩, and each Grothendieck element has finite root support.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

The mixed relation on K0. Let h=⟨hi,Λ−β⟩ at input root β. The Ei in EiFi has output root β, so its normalization contributes qi1−h. The Ei in FiEi has output root β−αi, whose coroot label is h+2, so its normalization contributes qi1−(h+2)=qi−1−h. Multiplying the positive basic commutator of [F1] by qi1−h therefore turns its qi−2FibasicEibasic term into precisely the normalized FiEi, and its identity terms into ∑k=0h−1qi1−h+2k=[h]i. For h≤0, the negative basic branch similarly gives FiEi=EiFi+∑k=0−h−1qi−1−h−2kId, whose sum is [−h]i, so the same signed relation follows. Thus EiFi−FiEi=[h]iId=(Ki−Ki−1)/(qi−qi−1) on root β, with Ki=qih; the quantum integer is integral, so no division in the coefficient ring is needed.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra

The unequal-color relation and the module actions. Write hi(β)=⟨hi,Λ−β⟩ and bij=diaij=(αi∣αj) for i≠j. At input root β, the normalization of Ei in EiFj is qi1−hi(β+αj−αi), whereas that in FjEi is qi1−hi(β−αi). Since hi(β+αj−αi)=hi(β−αi)−aij, their ratio is qiaij=qbij. This cancels the basic crossing factor q−bij in [F2], giving the normalized relation EiFj=FjEi. The canonical G0-action has the same shifts and hence the same computations as K0. For the KK G0-action the shift is instead carried by F: its exponent on input root β is 1−hj(β), so the ratio between EiFj and FjEi is qjhj(β−αi)−hj(β)=qjaji=qbij, again cancelling the basic factor. For the KK same-color relation, EiFi has shift qi1−h and FiEi has shift qi−1−h, exactly as in step 2.1. Both module actions therefore satisfy the required mixed relations; restriction lowers root height and the weight labels give the toral conjugation relations.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F3∎

Local nilpotence and integrability. By [F3], RΛ(β+nαi)=0 for n large, so the induction operator Fi is locally nilpotent componentwise; restriction lowers height, so Ei is locally nilpotent as well. The toral conjugation, mixed relations and local nilpotence are exactly the hypotheses of the abstract lemma [F3], which then proves both full symmetrizable Serre families and equips the scalar extension to Q(q) with the unique integrable type-one Uq(g)-module structure. No finite-dimensionality of full weight spaces and no ungraded monic deformation is asserted; no cyclic input from vacuum generation or the integral highest-module identification is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources