Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cyclotomic KLR functors define an integrable quantum action on K0 and G0

Statement

For the STANDARD graded cyclotomic quotient over any field and any real symmetrizable Cartan datum with admissible graded KLR parameters, put A=Z[q,q−1], hi(β)=⟨hi,Λ−β⟩, and qi=qdi. On projective K0 use Fi=Fibasic and Ei∣β=qi−1−hi(β)Eibasic; on module G0 use either the SAME canonical normalization, or the Kang--Kashiwara normalization EiKK=Eibasic, FiKK∣β=qi1−hi(β)Fibasic. In all cases Ki∣β=qihi(β). These operators satisfy the full quantum mixed and Serre relations and are locally nilpotent; their scalar extensions to Q(q) are integrable weight modules. No decomposition into finite-dimensional full-g submodules is asserted in affine or indefinite type.

The tensor pairing Tβ(P,M)=gdim⁡(Pψ⊗RΛ(β)M) is A-BILINEAR and weightwise perfect in normalized projective-cover/simple bases. The Hom pairing h(P,M)=gdim⁡HOM⁡(P,M) instead satisfies h(P,M)=T(P#,M) and is first-bar-sesquilinear. For T, projective Ei is adjoint to module FiKK and projective Fi to module EiKK. The two module actions are conjugate by the weight rescaling qdef⁡Λ(β), where def⁡Λ(β)=(Λ,β)−(β,β)/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard cyclotomic quotient RΛ, its graded Grothendieck groups and Cartan map (Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map), and the normalized-action lemma Normalized cyclotomic functors give an integrable quantum action.

[F1]

The normalized operators displayed in the Statement on both Grothendieck groups satisfy the mixed relations and the full symmetrizable Serre families, with local nilpotence and torus action Ki∣β=qihi(β) (Normalized cyclotomic functors give an integrable quantum action).

[F2]

The tensor and Hom pairings and the normalized cover/simple bases (Cyclotomic projective covers and dualities descend through the quotient); the Cartan pairing conventions of The KLR Cartan (graded Hom) pairing on the projective Grothendieck group.

[F3]

The basic functors and their adjunctions (Cyclotomic KLR induction and restriction functors).

Proof

Proof technique: combine the two normalizations, verify the pairings and the adjointness by corner tensor evaluation, and compare the two module actions by the defect rescaling.

1.1F1

The two normalizations agree with the actions. The normalized-action supplier [F1] gives, for Ei applied to input root β+αi, the exponent −1−hi(β+αi)=1−hi(β), exactly the target-weight normalization; the same computation with the factor on F gives the Kang--Kashiwara normalization. Both satisfy the mixed relations, the full Serre families and local nilpotence, and Ki∣β=qihi(β) in all cases; hence all four displayed operator families are integrable weight module structures after scalar extension to Q(q), with no assertion of finite-dimensional full-g submodules in affine or indefinite type.

2.1step 1.1F2

Bilinearity and perfectness of T. Tensor products of finite modules are finite, so T has Laurent-polynomial values. The quotient-cover lemma [F2] gives absolutely simple normalized heads and T(P(S),S′)=δS,S′, proving weightwise perfectness in normalized bases; shifting either tensor factor multiplies by the same power of q, which is exactly A-bilinearity. Finite-projective evaluation identifies HOM⁡(P,M) with (P#)ψ⊗M, so h(P,M)=T(P#,M), which is first-bar-sesquilinear rather than bilinear.

3.1step 2.1F3

Adjointness of the two normalized actions. For the corner Aβ→eBβ+ie, associativity of the balanced tensor over the corner gives TB(FbasicP,M)=TA(P,EbasicM): both sides are the dimension of the same balanced tensor. The generator-fixing anti-involution flips balanced tensors, so TB(P,FbasicM)=TA(EbasicP,M) as well, the corner factors becoming eB and Be in opposite order with multiplication giving the evaluation isomorphism. Multiplying the second identity by qi1−hi(β) gives the first normalized adjoint statement, and the first identity gives the other; neither the Frobenius theorem nor the highest-weight K0 theorem is used.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1F1∎

The defect rescaling. Adding an i changes the defect by di(hi(β)−1), so the two module actions of step 1.1 are conjugate by the weight rescaling qdef⁡Λ(β) with def⁡Λ(β)=(Λ,β)−(β,β)/2; the same computation applies on projective K0 with the roles of E and F exchanged. Hence the canonical and Kang--Kashiwara normalizations define the same quantum structure up to the stated conjugation, completing the proof.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources