Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded Specht classes realize the standard Fock vectors

Statement

In the regime of The nondegenerate root-of-unity level-one Hecke regime, let ΨcanHecke:G0gr(HΛ)→VA(Λ0)∨ be the transported identification of The QG-8 categorification transports across the blockwise Hecke-KLR bridge, and let Sμ:=π(Mμ) be the standard monomial image of the standard Fock vector Mμ of The symmetric-group level-one residue and partition-label convention under the projection to the basic module. Then for every partition μ with content α, ΨcanHecke([S(μ)])=Sμ. In other words, the class of the graded Specht module of The graded Specht module by homogeneous standard tableaux is the standard Fock vector in the fixed level-one convention. This holds in both branches (C0) and (CP). No choice beyond the inherited suppliers is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The nondegenerate level-one regime, the transported identification ΨcanHecke, the graded Specht modules S(μ) with their homogeneous standard-tableau bases, and the symmetric level-one Fock model with its standard vectors Mμ and projection π.

[F1]

The homogeneous basis theorem gives gdim⁡e(i)S(μ)=∑T:iT=iqdeg⁡T (The graded Specht module has a homogeneous tableau basis). The transported projective map sends P(i):=RαΛe(i) to Fid⋯Fi1vΛ0, since successive basic inductions append strands, and the canonical restricted-dual map is defined by the bilinear tensor pairing Ψcan(M)(ϕ(P))=T(P,M) (The QG-8 categorification transports across the blockwise Hecke-KLR bridge, The cyclotomic projective K0 is the integral highest-weight module, The cyclotomic module G0 is the restricted dual integral highest-weight module).

[F2]

The Fock model has nodes with residues c−r, standard vectors Mμ for all partitions, and node action formulas satisfying the quantum affine relations (The symmetric-group level-one residue and partition-label convention, The level-one partition Fock space and node residues, Semi-infinite wedges are indexed by partitions and the action gives the node formulas, The Fock space node formulas satisfy the quantum affine relations); the projection π onto the basic module commutes with the field quantum action and satisfies EiMμ=∑Aq−dA(μ∖A)Mμ∖A, where dA is the number of addable i-nodes strictly above A minus the number of removable i-nodes strictly above A, computed in μ∖A (Standard Fock vectors expand in the upper global basis).

[F3]

The integral highest weight module VA(Λ0) and its dual are irreducible over Q(q), with generated highest-weight submodules determined by the highest vector (The integrable quantum highest weight module exists and is unique); the normalized contravariant form satisfies B(Fix,y)=B(x,q−1KiEiy) (The contravariant form on an integrable highest weight module); the transported identification ΨcanHecke intertwines the canonical Ei with the Fock node action (The QG-8 categorification transports across the blockwise Hecke-KLR bridge, Cyclotomic KLR functors define an integrable quantum action on K0 and G0).

[F4]

The degree identities dA(μ)+dA(μ∖A)=hi(α)+1 and di(μ)=(Λ0−α,αi) are the content of Degree and codegree of standard tableaux in the level-one convention.

[C1]

Choice is inherited only through the declared global-basis interfaces used to identify the integral dual lattice (The Axiom of Choice, The QG-8 categorification transports across the blockwise Hecke-KLR bridge).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3algebra

Evaluate on projective words. For a residue word i=(i1,…,id) of content α, put P(i)=RαΛe(i) and transport it to the Hecke block. Appending the strands successively realizes it as Fidbasic⋯Fi1basic of the vacuum projective, so [F1] sends its class to Fid⋯Fi1vΛ0. The generator-fixing anti-involution identifies P(i)ψ with the right ideal e(i)RαΛ, and multiplication gives e(i)RαΛ⊗RαΛS(μ)≅e(i)S(μ). Thus the defining bilinear tensor pairing, without any Hom-pairing bar on a shifted first argument, gives ΨcanHecke([S(μ)])(Fid⋯Fi1vΛ0)=∑T:iT=iqdeg⁡T.

2.1F1F2F3F4algebra

The identical standard-coordinate evaluation. If A is a removable i-node of μ and α=cont⁡(μ), the Fock formula [F2] gives its removal coefficient q−dA(μ∖A). The operator Ki on the resulting weight Λ0−α+αi multiplies by qhi(α)+2. Contravariance of [F3] therefore gives the coefficient of Mμ in FiMμ∖A as qhi(α)+1−dA(μ∖A)=qdA(μ), by [F4]. Iterating additions from the vacuum enumerates precisely the standard tableaux of shape μ with successive residues i: at each stage the occupied nodes form a partition, and conversely its increasing filling records the addition path. The product of the node factors is q∑AdA=qdeg⁡T by the degree recursion. Hence the coordinate functional Std⁡μ(x)=B(x,Mμ) satisfies Std⁡μ(Fid⋯Fi1vΛ0)=∑T:iT=iqdeg⁡T, exactly step 1.1.

3.1C1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Equality in the restricted integral dual. The basic highest-weight module over Q(q) is generated from the vacuum by the negative generators, so its vectors Fid⋯Fi1vΛ0 span every weight space; no assertion that ordinary words alone span the divided-power lattice over A is needed. Steps 1.1–2.1 make the two functionals equal on this field spanning family. Both lie in the restricted integral weight dual by [F1] and the coordinate-functional construction of [F2]; their field equality therefore is equality in that lattice. Under the nondegenerate contravariant form, Std⁡μ is represented by Sμ=π(Mμ), giving the stated equation. It holds in both field-characteristic branches because the homogeneous basis and integral categorical pairing do, and uses no cellular head classification or characteristic-zero based theorem. Choice is precisely the inherited [C1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources