How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If has fewer than induced copies of and , then has fewer than
Statement
Let have vertices. If has vertices, , and satisfies , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A graph with vertices, a graph on vertices, reals and , and a subset with and .
An induced embedding of into is, by definition, an induced embedding of into whose image lies in (Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph, Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs).
The induced-copy number counts induced embeddings (The induced-embedding count ).
Proof
By [L1], every induced embedding counted by is also counted by .
Therefore by [L2].
Since , one has . Substituting this into step 2.1 yields .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Huang, Q. Ju, and X. Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, sec. 1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)