How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-cover transfer with inverted degree and sign anti-invariants
Statement
Assume AC. Let p:Y→X be a nonempty finite d-sheeted regular cover of path-connected CW spaces, and let R be a commutative unital ring in which d is invertible. Pullback identifies H*(X;R) with the deck-invariant graded subalgebra H*(Y;R)^G. For a double cover and 2 invertible, let O_R be its associated sign local system. Then H*(X;O_R) is naturally the anti-invariant part of H*(Y;R). No finite-dimensionality hypothesis is imposed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a nonempty finite -sheeted regular cover of path-connected CW spaces with deck group ; a commutative unital ring in which is invertible; and, for the second assertion, the case with invertible in and the associated sign local system on .
A finite covering has evenly covered neighbourhoods, and a lift of a continuous map from a simply connected, locally path-connected space with one prescribed value exists and is unique (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings, Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces, Two lifts from a connected space that agree at one point agree everywhere). The standard simplex and its faces are convex, hence simply connected and locally path connected (intersections with sufficiently small Euclidean balls are convex) (The standard topological simplex and its affine face maps, Every nonempty convex subset of is simply connected); the base and total spaces are path connected (Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).
For a regular cover the deck group acts on , transitivity on every fiber holds, and the deck transformations permute the lifts of a simplex; singular chains, cochains and cohomology with coefficients in are the usual free constructions on singular simplices (Regular coverings, Deck transformations and the deck-transformation group of a covering, Singular simplices and singular chain groups with coefficients, Singular cochain complex with coefficients, Singular cohomology with coefficients).
Homology and cohomology with local coefficients are defined by coefficient systems on the singular simplex category, and for the sign local system the coefficient module over a simplex is the orientation line of the double cover (Homology and cohomology with local coefficients).
Pullback on cohomology is a unital ring homomorphism for the cup product (Cup product is natural, unital and associative).
AC permits choosing one element from each of the nonempty sets of lifts and of orientation-line coordinates encountered below (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
On integral singular chains define τ(σ) as the sum of all d lifts of σ. The contractible simplex admits a lift for each point of the fiber over one vertex, and uniqueness of lifts shows these are all the lifts. Restriction to a face bijects these lift sets, so ∂τ=τ∂. This is precisely the chain construction proved in the published rational-transfer supplier; it precedes and is independent of its choice of coefficients. Precomposing R-valued cochains with τ gives T with Tp*=d id and pT=Σ_{g∈G}g. Thus p* is injective. Every pullback is invariant, and for invariant y, p*(d⁻¹Ty)=y. The ring identification follows from multiplicativity of pullback; transfer itself need not be multiplicative. This proves the upgrade over R, including R=Q and R=F_p with p∤d.
For a double cover with deck involution σ and 2 invertible, the sign local system downstairs corresponds to the anti-invariant cochain subcomplex upstairs. To verify this without invoking an unproved transfer with local coefficients, choose a lift of each singular simplex: the local-coefficient cochain assigns a coefficient in its orientation line; changing that lift changes its signed coordinate. Hence it corresponds exactly to an ordinary cochain c satisfying σc=−c. Transport along faces gives the ordinary cochain differential in these coordinates. The idempotents (1±σ)/2 split the entire cochain complex into its two eigenspaces; therefore cohomology of the anti-invariant subcomplex is the anti-invariant part of cohomology. This gives H*(X;O_R) ≅ H*(Y;R)^−.
This applies also when the spaces or cochain groups are infinite: the idempotents, not a finite-dimensional averaging argument, give the splitting.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings
- Regular coverings
- Deck transformations and the deck-transformation group of a covering
- Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces
- Two lifts from a connected space that agree at one point agree everywhere
- Every nonempty convex subset of $\mathbb R^n$ is simply connected
- Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component
- The standard topological simplex and its affine face maps
- Singular simplices and singular chain groups with coefficients
- Singular cochain complex with coefficients
- Singular cohomology with coefficients
- Homology and cohomology with local coefficients
- Cup product is natural, unital and associative
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)