How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A connected graded module coalgebra with injective unit orbit is free
Statement
Assume AC and fix a field . Let be a unital associative graded -algebra with , equipped with a degree-preserving coassociative counital coproduct such that and are algebra homomorphisms for the Koszul multiplication . Let be a coaugmented coassociative counital graded -coalgebra with , , and . Supply a -bilinear unital left -action satisfying , , and . Give the diagonal action for , and assume . If , , is injective, set and . Then is nonnegatively graded with , and every graded -linear section of induces a graded left -module isomorphism , , with acting on the first tensor factor. Such a section exists under AC. Any homogeneous -basis of lifts under to a homogeneous free -basis of . No commutativity, antipode, or finite-type hypothesis is imposed; supplying the homogeneous basis and lifts removes additional choice from the proof.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; a field ; a connected nonnegatively graded unital associative -algebra with and a coassociative counital degree-preserving coproduct that is an algebra homomorphism for the Koszul multiplication; a connected coaugmented coassociative counital graded coalgebra with , , ; a unital graded left -action on with and for the diagonal action; and an injective degree-preserving orbit map , .
The quotient has a surjective linear projection with kernel , and quotient vector-space operations are well defined (The quotient vector space and its canonical projection, Coset equality, well-defined quotient operations, and the canonical projection with kernel ).
Under AC every vector space has a basis, and every independent set extends to a basis (Every vector space has a basis, The Axiom of Choice).
A balanced bilinear formula induces a well-defined homomorphism on the module tensor product (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).
Tensor products commute with direct sums, admit bases built from bases of the factors, and satisfy the unit isomorphisms (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums, The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product, The regular module is a tensor unit: and ).
A free module on a set has the standard basis and the universal property of free modules (The free module on a set and its standard basis, Universal property of the free module on a set).
Proof
Grading and the counit give, for homogeneous m∈M_d with d>0, Δ_M(m)=u⊗m+m⊗u+R, where R lies in ⊕{0<i<d}M_i⊗M{d-i}. Indeed the degree-(0,d) component is u⊗m by (ε_M⊗id)Δ_M=id, since ε_M vanishes on positive degrees; the other counit identity gives the degree-(d,0) component. Tensor bidegrees are direct by [L5]. In degree zero, Δ_M(λu)=λu⊗u, as already justified. The same argument gives the two endpoints for Δ_A(a) in positive degree.
A⁺M is the span of a·m with a of positive degree. It is graded: decomposing a,m into homogeneous components expresses every element as a finite sum of homogeneous such products. It is an A-submodule, since b(a·m)=(ba)·m and each nonzero homogeneous product ba has positive degree. It has no degree-zero component. By [L2], Q is the direct sum of Q_d=M_d/(A⁺M)_d, π is graded and surjective, its kernel is A⁺M, and Q_0=M_0. Moreover π(a·m)=ε_A(a)π(m) for every a,m: positive-degree a is killed, and degree-zero a acts as a scalar.
Choose a k-basis of each Q_d and lift each basis vector to M_d; this is allowed by [L3] and AC. In degree zero use π(u), with lift u. Extend the lifts linearly on each degree and then on the direct sum to obtain a graded section f. Conversely any graded section has f(π(u))=u, because π:M_0→Q_0 is an isomorphism. The formula for Φ is balanced and bilinear over k, so [L4] makes it a well-defined map. It is graded, and A-linearity follows from (ba)f(q)=b(af(q)).
We prove surjectivity by induction on d≥0. In degree zero Φ is the scalar isomorphism k⊗k→k·u. Suppose every M_e with e<d is in its image, and take m∈M_d. The vector m-f(π(m)) lies in (A⁺M)_d, so it is a finite sum Σ a_t m_t with homogeneous a_t of positive degree and m_t of degree d-|a_t|<d. Such an expression is obtained by projecting any finite expression in A⁺M to degree d. By induction choose y_t∈A⊗Q with Φ(y_t)=m_t. Then m=Φ(1_A⊗π(m)+Σ a_t y_t). Thus Φ is surjective in each degree, and finite degree support proves surjectivity on M.
Define T=(id_M⊗π)Δ_M:M→M⊗Q. Give M⊗Q the A-action on the first factor only. Then T is A-linear. Indeed apply id⊗π to the diagonal compatibility formula. Every summand with a₂ of positive degree vanishes by step 1.2. The surviving terms have a₂ in degree zero, so their Koszul signs are 1; the counit identity (id⊗ε_A)Δ_A(a)=a combines these terms to give T(a·m)=a·T(m). This calculation also treats a of degree zero and all inhomogeneous inputs by linearity.
For homogeneous q∈Q_d, the component of T(f(q)) with second degree d is exactly u⊗q. Every other component has second degree strictly less than d, by step 1.1. When d=0 there are no other components. Therefore TΦ(a⊗q)=ν(a)⊗q + terms of second degree less than d. This statement concerns second-factor degree, not total degree; multiplication on the first factor preserves that comparison.
Suppose z∈ker Φ. By [L5], using a homogeneous k-basis (q_j) of Q, write z uniquely as a finite sum Σ_j a_j⊗q_j with a_j∈A. If z≠0, take the largest degree d of a q_j with a_j≠0. Since TΦ(z)=0, its component of second degree d gives Σ_{|q_j|=d} ν(a_j)⊗q_j=0. The q_j in this equation are distinct basis vectors. Their coordinate functionals, tensored with id_M via [L4], give ν(a_j)=0 individually. Injectivity of ν gives a_j=0, contradicting the definition of d. Hence z=0 and Φ is injective. This finite maximum argument requires no finite-dimensionality of Q or its degree pieces.
By steps 2.1 and 4.1, Φ is a bijective graded A-linear map. Its inverse is A-linear and graded by uniqueness of preimages. Every element of A⊗Q has a unique finite expression Σ a_j⊗q_j, by [L5]; the first-factor action turns this into a free A-module with basis 1_A⊗q_j, in the sense of [L6]. Transporting that basis by Φ proves the theorem, with each generator in degree |q_j|. AC was used only for the homogeneous basis and its lifts; no further infinite selection occurs in the degree induction or finite-maximum argument.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The quotient vector space $V/W$ and its canonical projection
- Coset equality, well-defined quotient operations, and the canonical projection with kernel $W$
- Every vector space has a basis
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
- Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums
- The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product
- The regular module is a tensor unit: $R\otimes_RN\cong N$ and $M\otimes_RR\cong M$
- The free module on a set and its standard basis
- Universal property of the free module on a set
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Weston, An Introduction to Cobordism Theory (standard reference, not scraped)