How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded fibrewise-soft resolutions from a uniform all-sheaf dimension bound
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a continuous map between locally compact Hausdorff spaces (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and let be an integer such that for every open subspace of every fibre , , and every sheaf of -vector spaces on (A sheaf on a topological space, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors; the sheaves may equally be sheaves of abelian groups). Then every sheaf of -vector spaces on has a bounded resolution by fibrewise c-soft sheaves: there is an exact sequence in which each restricts to a c-soft sheaf on every fibre (c-soft sheaves). For this says that every sheaf on is already c-soft on every fibre. In particular the constant sheaf has such a resolution.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous map between locally compact Hausdorff spaces, an integer with for all , all open subspaces of fibres of and all sheaves on , a sheaf of -vector spaces on , and the Axiom of Choice.
Fibres and their open subspaces: a fibre is closed in because singletons in are closed (a point is compact, so In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones applies) and continuous preimages of closed sets are closed (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and ); a closed subspace of a locally compact space is locally compact, and Hausdorffness is hereditary, so every fibre and every open subspace of a fibre is locally compact Hausdorff. Compactness of a subset may be read in the subspace or in the ambient space (In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure, , , and Hausdorffness are hereditary, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
c-softness and restrictions: injective -sheaves are flasque by the following local extension argument. For opens , set and . The canonical map is injective on every stalk: it is the identity on and has zero source outside . The module-linear section adjunction is the construction of Enough injective sheaves of modules, proof step 1.4, applied to . Injectivity of extends every across this monomorphism, so is surjective. Thus is flasque and its underlying abelian sheaf is c-soft by c-soft sheaves; injective abelian sheaves are also c-soft; restriction of a c-soft sheaf to an open or closed subspace is c-soft; c-soft sheaves are acyclic, for ; the restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace is the inverse image along the open inclusion and is exact (c-soft sheaves, Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves, Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace, Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf).
The vanishing criterion: if a sheaf on a locally compact Hausdorff space satisfies for every open , then is c-soft on (Vanishing compactly supported first cohomology on opens characterises c-softness).
Under AC, modules over the constant ring sheaf have functorial injective embeddings; iterating cokernels gives one specific resolution entirely in -sheaves (Enough injective sheaves of modules). The abelian-sheaf assertion is Enough injective abelian sheaves, used for the separately stated abelian case.
Long exact sequences: the functors on a locally compact Hausdorff space form a cohomological delta functor with , so every short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on has a long exact compactly supported cohomology sequence; a sequence of sheaves is exact if and only if it is exact on every stalk, and inverse-image restriction to any subspace preserves exactness: its stalk at is the original stalk at (The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point), so A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk applies (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors, Exact sequences of sheaves, A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk).
The Axiom of Choice, from which dependent choice follows; dependent choice is used by the resolution and delta-functor theorems of facts F4 and F5 (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Proof
Fibres are locally compact Hausdorff. For the fibre is closed in because is closed in the Hausdorff space and is continuous [F1], so is a closed subspace of the locally compact space and is locally compact, and it is Hausdorff as a subspace of a Hausdorff space [F1]; the same holds for every open subspace [F1]. Consequently, for every sheaf on that is c-soft on , the restriction is c-soft on and its further restriction is c-soft on , by the closed- and open-restriction clauses of [F2]; if is injective on it is c-soft on by the injectivity clause of [F2].
The resolution and its terms. Fix the supplied functorial injective resolution datum on of [F4] (on for the abelian case) and let be the injective resolution it assigns to . Each is injective in the chosen sheaf category, hence flasque and c-soft on by [F2], hence restricts to a c-soft sheaf on every fibre and to a c-soft sheaf on every open of a fibre, by [step 1.1]; in particular each is fibrewise c-soft.
Dimension shifting on an open subspace of a fibre. Let be open in a fibre and define the syzygies and, for , , so that is a short exact sequence of sheaves on . The inclusion need not be open, but inverse-image restriction preserves exactness by the stalk argument of [F5], so is a short exact sequence of sheaves on the locally compact Hausdorff space [F5] whose middle term is c-soft, hence acyclic [F2]; the long exact compactly supported cohomology sequence of [F5] therefore gives isomorphisms for every , because the two adjacent groups of the c-soft sheaf vanish in positive degrees. Iterating these isomorphisms for with gives , the last group vanishing by the dimension hypothesis of the statement because and is an open subspace of a fibre.
The cokernel after steps is fibrewise c-soft. Let be any fibre and let be open; by [step 3.1] one has for every such , so the vanishing criterion [F3] applied to the locally compact Hausdorff space and the sheaf shows that is c-soft on . Since was arbitrary, restricts to a c-soft sheaf on every fibre. Concatenating the short exact sequences for gives the exact sequence , a bounded resolution of entirely by -linear maps and -sheaves (by abelian maps and sheaves in the abelian case), whose terms are fibrewise c-soft by [step 2.1] and whose last term is fibrewise c-soft by the preceding argument; when take and the identity sequence ; the isomorphism of [step 3.1] with gives the c-softness of on every fibre directly by [F3].
Conclusion. The displayed bounded resolution of the statement is [step 4.1], and taking gives the instance of the constant sheaf. The Axiom of Choice is used only through the injective resolution datum of [F4] and the delta-functor and comparison statements of [F5], whose connecting maps use dependent choice, a consequence of AC [F6]; the fibre-by-fibre dimension count of [step 3.1] is finite.
Remarks
-
What is claimed and what is deferred. The resolution statement proved here is the finite-resolution form of Verdier's criterion: a uniform bound on the compact-support dimension of the open subspaces of the fibres bounds the length of a resolution of every sheaf by fibrewise c-soft sheaves. The scaffold also contemplated a statement about bounded complexes of sheaves, obtained by resolving each term and totalising over the bounded index range. That totalisation requires a Cartan--Eilenberg-style compatible choice of comparison maps making the total complex a complex of sheaves (naive termwise lifts need not square to zero), which the foundation this page rests on does not supply; the complex-level clause is therefore deferred rather than asserted, and no result in this pair depends on it.
-
Where the uniform bound is used. The hypothesis is used exactly once, in [step 3.1], to kill ; it is a uniform bound over all sheaves and all open subspaces of all fibres, not merely a bound on the cohomological dimension of a fixed sheaf. A single sheaf of finite compact-support dimension on each fibre would not suffice for the statement as formulated.
-
Relation to the acyclicity and criterion lemmas. The terms are c-soft because injective sheaves are c-soft, and the last term is c-soft by the converse criterion; both directions of the c-softness theory on this page are thereby used in the single construction.
Depends on
- c-soft sheaves
- Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors
- Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves
- Vanishing compactly supported first cohomology on opens characterises c-softness
- Compact-support calculus along open and closed embeddings
- Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace
- Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf
- The stalk of an inverse image sheaf is the stalk over the image point
- For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and $f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}$
- Support of a section of a sheaf
- Sections on a compact set extend to a neighbourhood
- Enough injective abelian sheaves
- Enough injective sheaves of modules
- Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor
- Exact sequences of sheaves
- A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- $T_0$, $T_1$, and Hausdorffness are hereditary
- A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Louis Verdier, Dualite dans la cohomologie des espaces localement compacts, Seminaire N. Bourbaki 1964-1966, expose 300, pp. 337-349 (Novembre 1965) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pierre Schapira, An Introduction to Categories and Sheaves, lecture notes, 2023 (standard reference, not scraped)