How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact-support calculus along open and closed embeddings
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a locally compact Hausdorff space, let be the inclusion of an open subspace with closed complement (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not), and let be the inclusion of . All sheaves below are sheaves of abelian groups (A sheaf on a topological space); every clause applies in particular to sheaves of -vector spaces.
- For every sheaf on the canonical map --- the restriction of the identification of with a subgroup of (Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors) --- is an isomorphism, natural in ; the functor carries c-soft sheaves on to c-soft sheaves on (c-soft sheaves); and the induced canonical isomorphisms hold for all and are natural in .
- For every sheaf on the canonical map --- the restriction of the identification of with (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure) --- is an isomorphism, natural in ; the functor carries c-soft sheaves on to c-soft sheaves on ; and the induced canonical isomorphisms hold for all and are natural in .
- If is compact (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right), then and for all (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).
All isomorphisms are the canonical ones induced by the extension-by-zero adjunction Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves and by the acyclic-resolution comparison The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors; no choice is used beyond the injective resolution data and their comparison theorems.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally compact Hausdorff space , an open subspace with closed complement , the inclusion , sheaves of abelian groups on and on , and the Axiom of Choice.
Extension by zero: for open , equivalently when every has an open neighbourhood with ; for the condition is vacuous and ; the functor is exact on sheaves of abelian groups and is left adjoint to restriction, and for while for (Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace, Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves).
Direct image: for open , ; is a sheaf of abelian groups on , and a morphism induces degreewise (Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure).
Compactly supported global sections: consists of the sections whose support is compact; is additive and left exact; is computed from the supplied functorial injective resolution datum on and forms a cohomological delta functor with long exact sequences; if the space is compact then and (Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors, Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor, Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).
c-softness: is c-soft when every section over a compact set extends to a global section, equivalently when every section over an open neighbourhood of a compact set agrees with a global section near it; flasque implies c-soft; injective abelian sheaves are c-soft; c-soft sheaves satisfy for ; c-softness is preserved by restriction to open and to closed subspaces and by extension by zero along an open inclusion; every section over a compact set extends to a compactly supported global section with support in any prescribed open neighbourhood (c-soft sheaves, Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves).
Supports: is closed in the domain of , the support of a restricted section is the trace of the support, and a section has empty support exactly when it is zero (Support of a section of a sheaf).
Topology: a compact set contained in an open subset of a locally compact Hausdorff space has a relatively compact open neighbourhood with closure inside that subset, by a finite cover using the pointwise shrinking of In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure; closed subsets of compact spaces and finite unions of compact subsets are compact (A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact); compact subsets of the Hausdorff space are closed and two disjoint compact subsets are separated by disjoint open sets; the open (respectively closed) subspaces of a locally compact Hausdorff space are locally compact and Hausdorff; open subsets of a subspace are traces of open subsets of ; and for the topology inherits from is the one it inherits from , so compactness of may be read in either space (In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it, , , and Hausdorffness are hereditary).
Exactness and injectives: the section group of an abelian sheaf over the empty set is the zero group (A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set); a sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when all its stalk sequences are (A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk); abelian sheaves on any topological space have enough injectives (Enough injective abelian sheaves); and injective comparison extensions exist between the resolutions of a supplied datum (A morphism has a comparison extension between the supplied injective resolutions).
Acyclic resolutions and naturality: the acyclic-resolution theorem identifies with the cohomology of any -acyclic resolution of when its syzygies lie in the domain of the supplied datum, which here is the entire sheaf category (The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors, An F-acyclic resolution, An acyclic object for a left exact functor); a natural transformation of additive functors induces natural transformations of the right derived functors computed from one supplied datum (A natural transformation induces natural transformations of right derived functors).
The Axiom of Choice, from which dependent choice follows (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Sections over compact sets have neighbourhood representatives; two compact-set sections agreeing on their intersection glue near their union by the two-piece fusion argument of Sections on a compact set extend to a neighbourhood, proof step 1.7.
Proof
Clause (1), degree zero. By [F1], . For such the support of read as a global section of is the same set : at the stalks of and agree with compatible germ identifications, while for the germ of vanishes, because the defining local condition supplies an open neighbourhood with , so the restriction of to is already the zero element of . Hence, using that compactness of a subset of may be read in or in and that compact subsets of are closed [F6], the subgroups and are equal inside ; the canonical map is the inclusion of these equal subgroups, hence a bijection, and it is natural in because acts as on sections of .
Clause (2), degree zero and stalks of . By [F2], . The stalks are computed as follows: for the sets with an open neighbourhood of in are exactly the open neighbourhoods of in and are cofinal in the colimit defining the stalk, and for each of them, so the two colimit diagrams agree and ; for the open set is a neighbourhood of with for every open , so . Consequently for the support of read as a global section of is the set , and compactness of a subset of may be read in or in [F6]; hence , the canonical map is the identity, and it is natural in because acts as on sections over .
Clause (1), c-softness. Let be c-soft on , let be compact and represent a section over by for open [F10]. Its support is closed in , so is compact and contained in [F1, F5, F6]. If , the zero global section has the same germs on . Otherwise choose opens with and compact closures [F6]. The sets and are compact in . The class of on and the zero class on agree on , since its points lie in and have zero germ of . Fuse these classes near their union in [F10], and use c-softness of to extend the resulting class to , with near and near [F4, F10]. Glue with zero on , since the overlap lies in . The result has support closed in and contained in compact , hence by step 1.1. On its germs are those of ; on both vanish, because . These sets cover , so restricts to the original section over . Hence is c-soft.
is exact. Let be an exact sequence of sheaves on and apply degreewise; by [F7] it suffices to test exactness of the resulting sequence at every stalk of . At a point the stalk sequence of the -images is the given exact stalk sequence under the identifications of [step 1.2], and at a point all three stalks vanish by [step 1.2], so the sequence is exact there. Hence sends exact sequences to exact sequences.
Clause (2), c-softness. Let be c-soft on , let be compact and let be a section of over , represented by a section over an open [F4]. Then is compact in [F6] and is an open neighbourhood of in , so c-softness of provides agreeing with on an open neighbourhood of [F4]. Choose open with [F6]; the global section agrees with the class over : at the open set contains and as elements of because , so the germs agree, and at the stalk vanishes by [step 1.2], so all germs there are equal. Hence is c-soft.
Clause (1), computing both derived functors by the same complex. Let be the injective resolution of supplied by the fixed functorial injective resolution datum on [F7, F8]; each is injective, hence c-soft on the locally compact Hausdorff space [F4], hence is c-soft on by [step 2.1], and c-soft sheaves on are acyclic for [F4]. Since is exact [F1], the complex is a -acyclic resolution of the sheaf on , and the acyclic-resolution theorem gives canonical isomorphisms for all . For the functor on , whose derived functors are formed with the same datum on , the resolution is likewise -acyclic, and the derived functors are computed by the very same complex ; since both isomorphisms are the canonical isomorphisms of the acyclic-resolution theorem for the same resolution complex, they are compatible with comparison extensions of morphisms [F7, F8].
Clause (2), the derived isomorphisms. Let be the injective resolution of supplied by the fixed datum on [F7, F8]; each is injective, hence c-soft on , hence is c-soft on by [step 2.3] and acyclic for [F4]; since is exact by [step 2.2], the complex is a -acyclic resolution of , and the acyclic-resolution theorem combined with the degreewise identification of [step 1.2] gives canonical isomorphisms for all , where the last isomorphism is the acyclic-resolution comparison on applied to the same resolution, whose terms are acyclic for because they are c-soft on [F4]; naturality in holds because the outer isomorphisms are the canonical ones for the fixed resolution data and the middle one is a degreewise natural identification.
Clause (1), the natural isomorphisms. Put on . Step 1.1 gives a natural isomorphism of additive left exact functors. Applied degreewise to the supplied resolution , it gives an isomorphism of complexes . Taking cohomology gives natural isomorphisms by [F8]. Composing with the canonical comparison of step 3.1 yields in every degree, naturally in .
Clause (3). Let be compact. For every sheaf on the support of a global section is closed in [F5], hence a closed subset of the compact space , hence compact, so every global section is compactly supported: and for all [F3]. Substituting into the isomorphisms of [step 1.2] for and of [step 3.2] for gives and for all .
Conclusion. Clause (1) is [step 1.1], [step 2.1] and [step 4.1]; clause (2) is [step 1.2], [step 2.3] and [step 3.2]; clause (3) is [step 4.2]. The Axiom of Choice is used only through the injective resolution data of [F7] and the comparison theorems of [F8], where dependent choice is required and follows from AC [F9].
Remarks
-
What is and is not a definitional identity. The identifications and are equalities of subgroups of and ; only after passing to derived functors does an argument (the acyclic-resolution comparison, or the degreewise natural isomorphism on the supplied resolution) enter.
-
Where closedness of is used. The complement is closed because is open; closedness gives the zero stalks outside in step 1.2 and the compactness of in step 2.3, and ensures that is locally compact Hausdorff. Compactness of subsets of may be read in (In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure). The direct image along the closed inclusion is exact; the analogous statement fails for a general continuous map, and no such statement is claimed here.
-
Relation to the short exact sequence. For every sheaf on the sequence of Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence and the isomorphisms proved here together let compactly supported cohomology of be assembled from its open and closed pieces; this is the precise sense in which the lemma is the compact-support calculus of the pair .
Depends on
- c-soft sheaves
- Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors
- Support of a section of a sheaf
- Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure
- Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf
- Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace
- Sections on a compact set extend to a neighbourhood
- Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves
- Extension by zero is left adjoint to restriction and is exact on abelian sheaves
- Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence
- The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors
- An F-acyclic resolution
- An acyclic object for a left exact functor
- Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor
- A natural transformation induces natural transformations of right derived functors
- Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections
- Enough injective abelian sheaves
- A morphism has a comparison extension between the supplied injective resolutions
- A sequence of abelian sheaves is exact exactly when it is exact on every stalk
- A set-valued sheaf has a unique section over the empty open set
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact
- $T_0$, $T_1$, and Hausdorffness are hereditary
- The stalk of a presheaf at a point
- Germs of sections
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- A polyhedral dimension bound for every sheaf Lemma
- Bounded fibrewise-soft resolutions from a uniform all-sheaf dimension bound Lemma
- Complex algebraic constructible complexes have finite conical cochain models Lemma
- Finite simplicial constructible sheaves have an actual derived incidence model Lemma
- Vanishing compactly supported first cohomology on opens characterises c-softness Lemma
- Constructible Verdier duality and complex orientation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
123 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Schapira, An Introduction to Categories and Sheaves, lecture notes, 2023 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Louis Verdier, Dualite dans la cohomologie des espaces localement compacts, Seminaire N. Bourbaki 1964-1966, expose 300, pp. 337-349 (Novembre 1965) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Sheaves (chapter 20); §21 Cohomology with support in a closed subset (tag 0A39) (standard reference, not scraped)