Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Vanishing compactly supported first cohomology on opens characterises c-softness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be a locally compact Hausdorff space (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and let E be a sheaf of abelian groups on X (A sheaf on a topological space); every clause applies in particular to sheaves of k-vector spaces. Suppose that Hc1(V,E∣V)=0for every open subspace V⊆X, where E∣V is the restriction (Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace) and Hc1 is the first compactly supported cohomology (Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors). Then E is c-soft (c-soft sheaves); more precisely, every section of E over a compact subset K⊆X extends to a compactly supported global section of E. Conversely, if E is c-soft, then Hcq(V,E∣V)=0 for every q>0 and every open subspace V⊆X. Hence c-softness of E is equivalent to RΓc(V,E∣V) being concentrated in degree 0 for every open subspace V⊆X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally compact Hausdorff space X, a sheaf E of abelian groups on X with Hc1(V,E∣V)=0 for every open V⊆X, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

Short exact sequence of the closed complement: for an open subspace j:U↪X with closed complement Z=X∖U and closed inclusion i:Z↪X, and for every sheaf F of abelian groups on X, there is a short exact sequence 0→j!(F∣U)→F→i∗(F∣Z)→0, where j! is extension by zero and i∗ is the direct image (Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence, Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace, Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure).

[F2]

The compact-support calculus: for j:U↪X open and i:Z↪X closed, the canonical maps Γc(X,j!A)→Γc(U,A) and Γc(X,i∗B)→Γc(Z,B) are natural isomorphisms, the functors j! and i∗ carry c-soft sheaves to c-soft sheaves, and the induced isomorphisms RqΓc(X,j!A)≅RqΓc(U,A) and RqΓc(X,i∗B)≅RqΓc(Z,B) hold for all q≥0; for compact Z one has Γc(Z,B)=Γ(Z,B) (Compact-support calculus along open and closed embeddings, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors).

[F3]

Long exact sequences: the functors RqΓc(X,−) form a cohomological delta functor with R0Γc(X,−)≅Γc(X,−), and every short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on X has a natural long exact compactly supported cohomology sequence, so a segment Hc0(X,A)→Hc0(X,B)→Hc0(X,C)→∂Hc1(X,A) is exact; here Hc0(X,F)=Γc(X,F) (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors, Enough injective abelian sheaves).

[F4]

c-softness: a sheaf is c-soft when every section over a compact set extends to a global section; restriction of a c-soft sheaf to an open subspace is c-soft; and c-soft sheaves are acyclic, Hcq(X,F)=0 for q>0 (c-soft sheaves, Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves).

[F6]

The Axiom of Choice, from which dependent choice follows; dependent choice is used by the delta-functor and derived-functor theorems invoked in fact F3 (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F5

Setup. Let K⊆X be compact; by [F5] the set K is closed, so U:=X∖K is open and the pair (U,K) is the open/closed decomposition of [F1] with closed inclusion i:K↪X. The restriction E∣K=i−1E is the sheaf of sections of E over K [F5], and [F1] applied to F=E produces the short exact sequence of sheaves on X 0→j!(E∣U)→E→i∗(E∣K)→0 with j:U↪X the open inclusion.

1.2F4

The converse. Suppose E is c-soft. For every open V⊆X the restriction E∣V is c-soft on V by [F4], and c-soft sheaves are acyclic, so Hcq(V,E∣V)=0 for every q>0; thus RΓc(V,E∣V) is concentrated in degree 0 with value Γc(V,E∣V). This proves the converse direction and, taking q>0 arbitrary, shows that RΓc(V,E∣V) concentrated in degree 0 for all opens V implies in particular the hypothesis Hc1(V,E∣V)=0 used below.

2.1step 1.1F2F3

The long exact sequence of the pair. Apply the delta-functor machinery of [F3] to the short exact sequence of [step 1.1]; the calculus of [F2] identifies its compactly supported cohomology with that of the open and closed pieces: Hc0(X,j!(E∣U))≅Γc(U,E) and Hc1(X,j!(E∣U))≅Hc1(U,E), while Hc0(X,i∗(E∣K))≅Γc(K,E∣K)=Γ(K,E∣K) because K is compact. The exact sequence therefore reads 0→Γc(U,E)→Γc(X,E)→Γ(K,E∣K)→ ∂ Hc1(U,E)→⋯ , and the hypothesis of the statement applies to the open subspace U=X∖K, giving Hc1(U,E)=0. Hence the kernel of ∂ is all of Γ(K,E∣K), that is, the restriction map Γc(X,E)→Γ(K,E∣K) is surjective.

3.1step 2.1F4

Conclusion of the direct direction. Since Γc(X,E)⊆Γ(X,E), the surjectivity of [step 2.1] shows that every section of E over K extends to a compactly supported global section, hence in particular to a global section; as K was an arbitrary compact subset, E is c-soft by [F4].

4.1step 1.2step 3.1F2F3F6∎

The equivalence. The direct direction is [step 3.1], and it produces the sharper statement that sections extend with compact support; the converse direction is [step 1.2]. Consequently c-softness of E is equivalent to the vanishing of Hcq(V,E∣V) for all q>0 and all open V⊆X, i.e. to RΓc(V,E∣V) being concentrated in degree 0 for every open V⊆X. The Axiom of Choice enters only through the injective resolution data and the delta-functor and calculus theorems of [F2] and [F3], whose comparison steps use dependent choice, a consequence of AC [F6].

Remarks

  • Why the hypothesis is stated for all opens. Only the complements X∖K of compact sets are used in the proof, but an arbitrary open subspace of a locally compact Hausdorff space need not be a compact complement, and the criterion is stated in the form needed by its consumers, where the vanishing is available for every open subspace of a fibre. The proof shows that the weaker hypothesis "Hc1(X∖K,E)=0 for every compact K" already implies c-softness.

  • Relation to the acyclicity lemma. The acyclicity lemma Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves proves that c-softness implies vanishing on the whole space and on open and closed restrictions; the present lemma is the converse, and the two together identify c-softness with a vanishing condition on all open subspaces, which is the form in which the finite-fibre-dimension theorem of this page verifies fibrewise c-softness.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources