How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing compactly supported first cohomology on opens characterises c-softness
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a locally compact Hausdorff space (Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space, Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and let be a sheaf of abelian groups on (A sheaf on a topological space); every clause applies in particular to sheaves of -vector spaces. Suppose that where is the restriction (Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace) and is the first compactly supported cohomology (Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors). Then is c-soft (c-soft sheaves); more precisely, every section of over a compact subset extends to a compactly supported global section of . Conversely, if is c-soft, then for every and every open subspace . Hence c-softness of is equivalent to being concentrated in degree for every open subspace .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally compact Hausdorff space , a sheaf of abelian groups on with for every open , and the Axiom of Choice.
Short exact sequence of the closed complement: for an open subspace with closed complement and closed inclusion , and for every sheaf of abelian groups on , there is a short exact sequence , where is extension by zero and is the direct image (Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence, Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace, Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map, Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure).
The compact-support calculus: for open and closed, the canonical maps and are natural isomorphisms, the functors and carry c-soft sheaves to c-soft sheaves, and the induced isomorphisms and hold for all ; for compact one has (Compact-support calculus along open and closed embeddings, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors).
Long exact sequences: the functors form a cohomological delta functor with , and every short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on has a natural long exact compactly supported cohomology sequence, so a segment is exact; here (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor, Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors, Enough injective abelian sheaves).
c-softness: a sheaf is c-soft when every section over a compact set extends to a global section; restriction of a c-soft sheaf to an open subspace is c-soft; and c-soft sheaves are acyclic, for (c-soft sheaves, Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves).
Topology: a compact subset of the Hausdorff space is closed, so its complement is an open subspace and is itself locally compact Hausdorff; compactness of a subset may be read in the subspace or in ; and over is the sheaf of sections of over (In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones, In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
The Axiom of Choice, from which dependent choice follows; dependent choice is used by the delta-functor and derived-functor theorems invoked in fact F3 (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Proof
Setup. Let be compact; by [F5] the set is closed, so is open and the pair is the open/closed decomposition of [F1] with closed inclusion . The restriction is the sheaf of sections of over [F5], and [F1] applied to produces the short exact sequence of sheaves on with the open inclusion.
The converse. Suppose is c-soft. For every open the restriction is c-soft on by [F4], and c-soft sheaves are acyclic, so for every ; thus is concentrated in degree with value . This proves the converse direction and, taking arbitrary, shows that concentrated in degree for all opens implies in particular the hypothesis used below.
The long exact sequence of the pair. Apply the delta-functor machinery of [F3] to the short exact sequence of [step 1.1]; the calculus of [F2] identifies its compactly supported cohomology with that of the open and closed pieces: and , while because is compact. The exact sequence therefore reads and the hypothesis of the statement applies to the open subspace , giving . Hence the kernel of is all of , that is, the restriction map is surjective.
Conclusion of the direct direction. Since , the surjectivity of [step 2.1] shows that every section of over extends to a compactly supported global section, hence in particular to a global section; as was an arbitrary compact subset, is c-soft by [F4].
The equivalence. The direct direction is [step 3.1], and it produces the sharper statement that sections extend with compact support; the converse direction is [step 1.2]. Consequently c-softness of is equivalent to the vanishing of for all and all open , i.e. to being concentrated in degree for every open . The Axiom of Choice enters only through the injective resolution data and the delta-functor and calculus theorems of [F2] and [F3], whose comparison steps use dependent choice, a consequence of AC [F6].
Remarks
-
Why the hypothesis is stated for all opens. Only the complements of compact sets are used in the proof, but an arbitrary open subspace of a locally compact Hausdorff space need not be a compact complement, and the criterion is stated in the form needed by its consumers, where the vanishing is available for every open subspace of a fibre. The proof shows that the weaker hypothesis " for every compact " already implies c-softness.
-
Relation to the acyclicity lemma. The acyclicity lemma Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves proves that c-softness implies vanishing on the whole space and on open and closed restrictions; the present lemma is the converse, and the two together identify c-softness with a vanishing condition on all open subspaces, which is the form in which the finite-fibre-dimension theorem of this page verifies fibrewise c-softness.
Depends on
- c-soft sheaves
- Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors
- Support of a section of a sheaf
- Compact-support acyclicity of c-soft sheaves
- Compact-support calculus along open and closed embeddings
- Extension by zero for abelian sheaves on an open subspace
- Extension by zero and the closed complement: a short exact sequence
- Direct image of a sheaf along a continuous map
- Direct image preserves sheaves and objectwise algebraic structure
- Restriction of a sheaf to an open subspace
- Inverse image presheaf and inverse image sheaf
- Exact sequences of sheaves
- Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor
- Enough injective abelian sheaves
- A sheaf on a topological space
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- Locally compact topological space: every point has a compact neighbourhood; and what this says in a metric space
- Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not
- In a locally compact Hausdorff space every point has a neighbourhood base of compact sets, every open subspace and every closed subspace is locally compact, every open set around a point contains an open set with compact closure inside it, and every compact set sits inside an open set with compact closure
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pierre Schapira, An Introduction to Categories and Sheaves, lecture notes, 2023 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Louis Verdier, Dualite dans la cohomologie des espaces localement compacts, Seminaire N. Bourbaki 1964-1966, expose 300, pp. 337-349 (Novembre 1965) (standard reference, not scraped)