How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fourier-Stieltjes transforms determine finite Radon measures
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Dependent Choice. Let be a locally compact Hausdorff abelian group with dual , and let be a finite regular complex Borel measure on (Regular complex Borel measures). If the inverse transform vanishes for every , then . Equivalently, two finite regular complex Borel measures on with the same inverse transform are equal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and Dependent Choice, a locally compact Hausdorff abelian group with Haar measure and dual , a finite regular complex Borel measure on , and the assumption that its inverse transform vanishes for every . Write and .
The Fourier transform is a linear map with for every (The Fourier transform on an LCA group, Riemann-Lebesgue lemma on LCA groups).
and for , so the transform algebra is a self-adjoint algebra (Fourier transform intertwines translation, modulation and convolution); the characters of are exactly and , is a compact Hausdorff space whose Gelfand topology is generated by the functions , the correspondence is a bijection onto , and is homeomorphic to (Scalar unitisation of L^1 of an LCA group: characters, spectrum and identity criterion, Gelfand transform, Maximal ideal space is compact Hausdorff, The Axiom of Choice).
If is a compact Hausdorff space and is a point-separating self-adjoint complex function algebra with a unique common zero , then the uniform closure of is exactly (Complex Stone–Weierstrass dichotomy for separating self-adjoint algebras; the unital case is dense); functions on vanishing at infinity are the continuous functions on that extend continuously by at the point at infinity (Compact support, , and ).
For the set where is -finite for , and is finite; Tonelli and Fubini therefore apply to the product of a -finite essential support of with , and (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, The space as the quotient by null functions, Regular complex Borel measures, The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
If two Radon measures on a locally compact Hausdorff space agree on every continuous compactly supported function, then they are equal (Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures, Radon measure on an LCH space); a finite regular complex Borel measure has finite regular real and imaginary parts whose Jordan decompositions are finite positive regular Borel measures, hence Radon measures (Regular complex Borel measures, Radon measure on an LCH space).
Proof
(The transform algebra separates the character space.) Put . By [F2] the map is a linear bijection onto that carries convolution to pointwise multiplication and to complex conjugation, so is a self-adjoint complex algebra of functions on ; by [F1] it is contained in . Viewed on through , it is a subalgebra of that contains and vanishes at . If in then , and since the Gelfand topology is Hausdorff there is with ; the two characters agree on constants, so . Likewise gives with . Hence separates points of and has no common zero there, while its extension to has the unique common zero .
(The pairing identity.) Let . Then The integrand is absolutely integrable over the product of a -finite essential support of with by [F4], so Fubini applies and, using ,
(Uniform density of the transform algebra.) By step 1.1 the algebra is self-adjoint, point-separating, and its only common zero is . The vanishing-at-one-point case of [F3] applied to and gives that the uniform closure of is . Under the homeomorphism of [F2], this is exactly the space of continuous functions on vanishing at infinity; hence is uniformly dense in .
(Vanishing against all of .) Let and . By step 2.1 choose with . By step 1.2, , so Hence for every .
(Conclusion .) Every lies in , so by step 3.1 for all . Write with finite positive regular Borel measures, as in [F5]. Then for every real-valued one has and ; by [F5] applied to the Radon measures and then to , all four equalities hold as measures, so .
(Equivalence.) If finite regular complex Borel measures on have the same inverse transform, then is again a finite regular complex Borel measure and its inverse transform vanishes identically; step 4.1 gives , that is, .
Depends on
- The Fourier transform on an LCA group
- Nonzero multiplicative functionals on L^1 of an LCA group are Fourier evaluations
- Scalar unitisation of L^1 of an LCA group: characters, spectrum and identity criterion
- Fourier transform intertwines translation, modulation and convolution
- Riemann-Lebesgue lemma on LCA groups
- Complex Stone–Weierstrass dichotomy for separating self-adjoint algebras; the unital case is dense
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- Assuming Dependent Choice, uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures
- The bounded complex dual of C_0(X) is regular complex measures
- Radon measure on an LCH space
- Regular complex Borel measures
- Compact support, $C_c(X)$, and $C_0(X)$
- Gelfand transform
- Maximal ideal space is compact Hausdorff
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
92 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. W. Koerner, Topological Groups (author PDF, Internet Archive snapshot of the dpmms.cam.ac.uk Topg.pdf file) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Manfred Einsiedler and Thomas Ward, Ergodic Theory with a View Towards Number Theory, Appendix C.2-C.3 (course-hosted full text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lynn H. Loomis, Introduction to Abstract Harmonic Analysis, D. Van Nostrand, 1953 (Harvard-hosted full scan) (standard reference, not scraped)