Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonnegativity and equality for density Jensen–Shannon divergence

Statement

For two probability measures P,Q with finite-valued nonnegative densities p,q relative to a common measure μ, put m=(p+q)/2, r=p/m and s=q/m where m>0, and r=s=0 where m=0. Set ϕ(0)=0 and ϕ(t)=tln⁡t for t>0. The functions mϕ(r) and mϕ(s) are integrable, and the density-defined Jensen–Shannon divergence JS⁡μ(P,Q)=12∫mϕ(r) dμ+12∫mϕ(s) dμ is a finite nonnegative real number. It is zero if and only if P=Q, equivalently if and only if p=q μ-almost everywhere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measure space (X,A,μ), probability measures P,Q, and finite-valued nonnegative measurable densities p,q relative to μ.

[F1]

GAN minimax objective and its distributional domain: P(E)=∫Ep dμ and Q(E)=∫Eq dμ for every measurable E, and ∫p dμ=∫q dμ=1.

[F2]

Density-defined Jensen–Shannon divergence: m=(p+q)/2; on m>0, r=p/m, s=q/m satisfy 0≤r,s≤2 and r+s=2; on m=0 set r=s=0. With ϕ(0)=0 and ϕ(t)=tln⁡t for t>0, JS⁡μ(P,Q)=12∫mϕ(r) dμ+12∫mϕ(s) dμ.

[F5]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere: a nonnegative measurable function has integral zero exactly when it vanishes μ-almost everywhere.

[F6]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ): the Lebesgue integral is linear on integrable functions.

[F7]

Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: the nonnegative Lebesgue integral is additive on nonnegative measurable functions.

[F8]

Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: the nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous for positive scalars.

[F9]

Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral: sums and finite scalar multiples of real measurable functions are measurable.

[F10]

A map into Rn is measurable exactly when its coordinates are measurable: a map into Rn is measurable when its coordinate functions are measurable.

[F11]

Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability: composing a measurable map with a Borel map preserves measurability.

[F12]

Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined: arithmetic operations, including pointwise products, preserve measurability when defined.

[F13]

Integral over a measurable subset: for nonnegative measurable f and measurable E, ∫Ef dμ=∫fχE dμ.

[F14]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: for a real integrable function u, ∫u dμ=∫u+ dμ−∫u− dμ.

[F15]

The integral of a nonnegative simple function: the simple integral of cχE is cμ(E) for c≥0 and measurable E.

[F16]

The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions: the nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on nonnegative simple functions.

Proof

1.1givenF3F4algebra

Define ψ(0)=1 and ψ(t)=tln⁡t−t+1 for t>0. If 0<t<1, then ln⁡t=−∫t1du/u>−(1−t)/t=1−1/t, since 1/u<1/t for t<u≤1. If t>1, then ln⁡t=∫1tdu/u>(t−1)/t=1−1/t, since 1/u>1/t for 1≤u<t. Thus ψ(t)>0 for t≠1 and ψ(1)=0. Also −1≤ϕ(t)≤0 for 0<t≤1, by the first inequality and ln⁡t≤0; and 0≤ϕ(t)≤t(t−1)≤2 for 1≤t≤2, since ln⁡t=∫1tdu/u≤t−1. At t=0, ϕ(0)=0 and ψ(0)=1. Hence ψ≥0 with equality exactly at 1, ∣ϕ(t)∣≤2, and ψ(t)≤5 on [0,2].

2.1F1F2F6F7F8F9F10F11F12step 1.1algebra

By [F1], [F7] and [F8], ∫m dμ=12∫(p+q) dμ=1. By [F2], 0≤r,s≤2. The ratio maps R(a,b)=2a/(a+b) and S(a,b)=2b/(a+b) on a+b>0, extended by 0 at (0,0), are Borel because they are continuous on {a+b>0} and separately defined on the Borel singleton {(0,0)}. The functions ϕ,ψ are continuous on [0,2], including at 0. Thus coordinatewise measurability [F10], composition with these Borel maps [F11], and arithmetic closure [F9] give measurable m,r,s,ϕ(r),ϕ(s),ψ(r),ψ(s); product closure [F12] then gives measurability of mϕ(r), mϕ(s), and 12m(ψ(r)+ψ(s)). Step 1.1 gives ∣mϕ(r)∣,∣mϕ(s)∣≤2m and 0≤12m(ψ(r)+ψ(s))≤5m, so they are integrable. On m>0, r+s=2 and ϕ(t)=ψ(t)+t−1, so ϕ(r)+ϕ(s)=ψ(r)+ψ(s)≥0; when m=0 both products by m vanish. Linearity in [F6] gives JS⁡μ(P,Q)=∫12m(ψ(r)+ψ(s)) dμ≥0.

3.1F1F5F6F8F9F12F13F14step 1.1step 2.1algebra

If JS⁡μ(P,Q)=0, the nonnegative measurable function h:=12m(ψ(r)+ψ(s)) has integral zero by step 2.1. By [F5], h=0 μ-almost everywhere. On m>0, both ψ(r) and ψ(s) are nonnegative, so they must each be zero almost everywhere there; step 1.1 gives r=s=1 there, hence p=q. On m=0, nonnegativity and m=(p+q)/2 give p=q=0. Thus p=q μ-almost everywhere. For each E∈A, [F1] and [F13] give P(E)−Q(E)=∫pχE dμ−∫qχE dμ. These restrictions are integrable because they are bounded by p and q, whose integrals are 1; [F8] and [F6] rewrite their difference as ∫uE dμ for uE:=pχE−qχE. The positive and negative parts of uE are measurable by [F9, F12] and vanish almost everywhere, so [F5] makes both nonnegative integrals zero. By [F14], ∫uE dμ=0, hence P(E)=Q(E).

3.2F1F2F5F6F7F8F9F12F13F14F15F16step 2.1algebra

Conversely, suppose P=Q. For positive integers n,k, put En,k:={p−q≥1/n}∩{p+q≥1/k}, which is measurable by [F9]. Since {p>q}=⋃n,k≥1En,k, positive measure of {p>q} would make some E:=En,k have positive measure. On E, (1/k)χE≤(p+q)χE≤p+q, so [F8], [F13], [F15] and [F16] give μ(E)/k≤∫E(p+q) dμ≤∫(p+q) dμ=2 by [F1], [F7] and step 2.1; hence μ(E)<∞. Put u:=(p−q)χE. By [F9, F12], u is nonnegative measurable, and (1/n)χE≤u, so [F8], [F15] and [F16] give ∫u dμ≥μ(E)/n>0. Also pχE and qχE are integrable since they are bounded by p and q; [F1], [F13] and [F6] therefore give ∫u dμ=P(E)−Q(E)=0, a contradiction. The same argument with p,q exchanged rules out {q>p}, hence p=q μ-almost everywhere. Then mϕ(r) and mϕ(s) vanish almost everywhere: on m>0, r=s=1 almost everywhere, and on m=0 both products are zero. Their positive and negative parts are measurable by [F9, F12] and vanish almost everywhere, so [F5] makes all four nonnegative integrals zero. Step 2.1 gives their integrability, and [F14] and [F2] therefore yield JS⁡μ(P,Q)=0.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 prove that JS⁡μ(P,Q) is zero exactly when P=Q; step 2.1 proves it is finite and nonnegative. These are all claims in the Statement.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Density-defined Jensen–Shannon divergence.

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources