Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Gaussian collocation defect has a high-order weighted endpoint bound

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the Lebesgue interval-measure formula. Fix M≥1, the M-node Gauss rule for Lebesgue measure on [0,1], a time t, and an exact IVP solution y on an interval containing [t,t+h0] for some h0>0, with initial state u=y(t). Let D⊆R×Rd be open, let f:D→Rd be an IVP vector field on a neighborhood of a common compact convex tube, let uh be its Gauss collocation polynomial for this exact start, and put gh(s)=f(t+hs,uh(s)). Assume each scalar coordinate of f has continuous partial derivatives through total order 2M+1, all bounded on the tube; vector smoothness and derivatives below are understood componentwise, with scalar Taylor and quadrature results applied coordinatewise. The tube contains the exact path, uh, and every segment joining them, and the collocation branch and tube are uniform for sufficiently small h≤h0. Use the induced Euclidean operator norm ∥A∥op:=sup⁡∥v∥2=1∥Av∥2, and assume ∥Dyf∥op≤L on the tube. Then its endpoint defect satisfies ∥y(t+h)−uh(1)∥2≤Ch2M+1, where C may depend on the fixed nodes and on M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The IVP and exact path, its M-node Gauss collocation polynomial, the common convex tube, and the uniform smoothness hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: uh(0)=y(t), uh′(s)=hIMgh(s), and uh(1) is the collocation endpoint.

[F2]

Collocation polynomial derivatives scale with the step size: gh(j)=O(hj) for 0≤j≤2M, and the collocation defect rh=uh′−hgh satisfies rh=O(hM+1).

[F3]

Gaussian quadrature is exact through degree 2m−1 and has positive weights and Gaussian quadrature has the Hermite mean-value remainder: the Gauss rule is exact through degree 2M−1; for each C2M scalar coordinate function v its quadrature error is bounded by ∥v(2M)∥∞∫01pM(s)2ds/(2M)!.

[F4]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: the scalar Taylor supplier applies to each coordinate or matrix entry, with remainders bounded by the corresponding uniform derivative bound.

[F5]

Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives: derivatives of finite products and compositions satisfy the chain and Leibniz rules.

[F7]

The uniform limit of continuous real-valued functions on a metric space is continuous: a uniform limit of continuous real functions is continuous, entrywise for finite-dimensional matrix functions.

[F9]

R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R: every Cauchy sequence in the finite-dimensional matrix space, identified with a Euclidean space of entries, converges there.

[F10]

Cardinal-polynomial interpolation and Cardinal interpolation functions are polynomials of the stated degrees: IMgh is the cardinal polynomial sum of degree at most M−1 and matches gh at every Gauss node.

[F11]

The m-node Gaussian quadrature rule for a positive measure and Lebesgue measure on the unit interval supplies Gaussian moment data: the Gauss weights are wj=∫ℓj dλ for valid order-2M Lebesgue moment data on [0,1]; that same measure also meets the lower order-2M−1 moment branch because its moments through degree 2M−1 are finite.

[F12]

Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree for continuous data on [0,1]: continuous node polynomials have equal Riemann and Lebesgue integrals on [0,1].

[F13]

First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: the exact path satisfies y′=f(t,y).

[F14]

Monic orthogonal polynomials exist uniquely through the quadrature order: the monic degree-M orthogonal polynomial is uniquely determined by the same moments in either moment-data branch.

[F15]

Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: the one-variable coordinate paths and composites use the scalar Ck convention; the multivariable smoothness of each component of f is the partial-derivative assumption in the Statement.

[A2]

Countable Choice, through the Lebesgue interval-measure formula needed to identify the Gauss measure and its moments.

[A1]

All partial derivatives of f through order 2M+1 are bounded on the compact tube. The induced Euclidean operator norm is submultiplicative by its definition.

Proof

1.1givenA1A2F1F2F8F13algebra

Let yh(s)=y(t+hs) and e(s)=yh(s)−uh(s). Define the averaged Jacobian A(s)=∫01Dyf(t+hs,uh(s)+θe(s)) dθ and B(s)=hA(s). For each unit vector v∈Rd, the vector integral inequality [F8] gives ∥A(s)v∥2≤∫01∥Dyf(t+hs,uh(s)+θe(s))v∥2 dθ≤L. Taking the supremum over unit v proves ∥A(s)∥op≤L and hence ∥B(s)∥op≤hL. Applying the scalar FTC to each coordinate along the segment gives f(t+hs,yh(s))−f(t+hs,uh(s))=A(s)e(s). With rh=uh′−hgh, [F13] and [F1] give e′=Be−rh, e(0)=0.

2.1A1F6F7F8F9step 1.1inductionconstructalgebra

For a continuous matrix function X set ∥X∥∞:=sup⁡s∈[0,1]∥X(s)∥op. Define (TX)(s)=∫s1X(τ)B(τ) dτ entrywise. For any unit vector v, the vector integral inequality [F8] and submultiplicativity in [A1] give ∥(TX−TY)(s)v∥2≤∫s1∥(X−Y)(τ)B(τ)v∥2 dτ≤hL∥X−Y∥∞. Taking the supremum over unit v and s proves ∥TX−TY∥∞≤hL∥X−Y∥∞. For hL≤1/2, T is a contraction. Starting with P0=I, set Pn+1=I+TPn. Successive differences are bounded by 2−n∥TP0∥∞, so their entries are uniformly Cauchy; [F9] gives an entrywise limit and the geometric tail bound makes convergence uniform. Each iterate is continuous and [F7] makes the limit P continuous. Passing to the limit in Pn+1=I+TPn gives P=I+TP, hence P′=−PB and P(1)=I by applying [F6] to each matrix entry. If P and P~ both solve it, D=P−P~=TD implies ∥D∥∞≤12∥D∥∞, so D=0; also P=I+TP gives ∥P∥∞≤2.

2.2A1F5F13F15step 1.1inductionalgebra

The normalized exact path satisfies yh′=hf(t+hs,yh(s))=O(h) by [F13] and [A1]. If yh(r)=O(hr) for 1≤r≤j, the chain rule [F5] writes the jth derivative of f(t+hs,yh(s)) as a finite sum whose argument-derivative orders total j; each term is O(hj). Differentiating the IVP identity gives yh(j+1)=O(hj+1). Induction proves yh(j)=O(hj) through order 2M.

3.1A1F2F5F15step 2.2algebra

The path uh+θ(yh−uh) between the collocation polynomial and exact path has normalized derivatives of order j≤M−1 of size O(hj) by [F2] and step 2.2. Repeated chain and product rules for Dyf, then integration over 0≤θ≤1 with uniform remainders on the compact tube, give ∥A(j)∥∞=O(hj) and ∥B(j)∥∞=O(hj+1) for 0≤j<M.

4.1F4F5step 2.1step 3.1inductionalgebra

Differentiating P′=−PB entrywise gives P(j)=−∑k=0j−1(j−1k)P(k)B(j−1−k) for 1≤j≤M. Induction from ∥P∥∞≤2 and step 3.1 yields ∥P(j)∥∞≤Cjhj. Apply the scalar Taylor formula [F4] to every matrix entry to get a matrix polynomial q of degree at most M−1 with ∥P−q∥∞≤ChM and ∥q(j)∥∞≤Cjhj for j<M. Finite dimensionality combines the entrywise bounds in the induced operator norm.

5.1A2F1F2F3F10F11F12F14step 4.1algebra

By [F1], bj=∫01ℓj(s) ds; by [F11] the Gauss weights are wj=∫ℓj dλ. The continuous-integral agreement [F12] gives bj=wj. Uniqueness of the monic orthogonal polynomial [F14] makes the order-2M and order-(2M−1) branch nodes identical, so [F3] applies to this tableau. By [F2], ∥gh−IMgh∥∞=O(hM). The cardinal interpolation [F10] gives degree at most 2M−2 for each coordinate of qIMgh, and [F3] therefore gives, coordinatewise, ∫qIMgh=∑jbjq(cj)gh(cj). Split the weighted defect integral entrywise as ∫01P(gh−IMgh)=∫01(P−q)(gh−IMgh)+(∫01qgh−∫01qIMgh).

6.1F2F3F5step 4.1step 5.1algebra

The first integral in step 5.1 is O(h2M) by step 4.1 and ∥gh−IMgh∥∞=O(hM). For each scalar coordinate, the parenthesized term is the Gauss quadrature error for that coordinate of qgh. Leibniz' rule [F5] and the bounds q(j)=O(hj) and gh(j)=O(hj) show (qgh)(2M)=O(h2M) coordinatewise, so the scalar remainder [F3] bounds every coordinate error by O(h2M). Since there are finitely many coordinates, the vector integral is O(h2M) in Euclidean norm. Hence ∫01P(gh−IMgh)=O(h2M).

7.1F1F2F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 6.1algebra∎

By step 1.1, e′=Be−rh, and step 2.1 gives P′=−PB, P(1)=I. Apply the product rule entrywise to obtain (Pe)′=−Prh; the scalar FTC on each coordinate and e(0)=0 give e(1)=−∫01Prh=h∫01P(gh−IMgh). Step 6.1 bounds this by O(h2M+1), and [F1] identifies uh(1) as the collocation endpoint. This proves the local defect bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

144 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources