Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 17 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 14 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Deferred correction and collocation iterations

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Summary

For distinct nodes, the page defines the collocation tableau from cardinal polynomials and derives an explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep. It proves when the sweep is well defined and contractive, identifies its fixed point with the collocation stages, gives a residual-to-stage error estimate, and counts stage evaluations and storage. The scalar linear example computes the iteration matrix separately and shows why a stable fully solved step does not ensure convergence of the iteration.

The page proves local defect order M and global order M for collocation under smoothness, common-tube, branch, and small-step stability assumptions. For Gauss nodes, a weighted defect argument with the Hermite quadrature remainder proves local and global order 2M; it does not infer superconvergence from polynomial degree alone. One-node Gauss collocation is proved to be implicit midpoint of order two. From exact initial data and with a constant predictor, k completed sweeps give guaranteed order min⁡(M,k+1) for fixed k, while a residual target of stage error O(hp+1) preserves order p.

All constants may depend on the fixed node set and its Lebesgue constant. The iteration results are local to their invariant stage set and contraction conditions; no stiff-convergence claim is made when those conditions fail, and no uniform-in-M estimate is asserted.

The generic collocation and SDC results use no choice axiom in their local arguments. The specializations to Gaussian quadrature for Lebesgue measure on [0,1] are conditional on Countable Choice through the library's interval-measure theorem; the A page keeps that axiom branch explicit.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree for continuous data on [0,1]

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let g:[0,1]→R be continuous. Its Riemann integral and its Lebesgue integral with respect to Lebesgue measure on [0,1] both exist and are equal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous real function g on the compact interval [0,1].

[F1]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous real function on a compact interval is bounded and Riemann integrable; its Riemann integral lies between every lower and upper Darboux sum.

[F4]

A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included: under Countable Choice, every interval cell of length 1/N in the uniform partition has Lebesgue measure 1/N; a finite endpoint has measure zero.

[F5]

The integral of a nonnegative simple function, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, and The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ): a finite real simple function is Lebesgue integrable and its integral is the finite sum of its values times the measures of its level sets; finite sums and differences of integrable functions integrate linearly.

[F6]

Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral and Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: if u is Lebesgue measurable and ∣u∣≤ε1[0,1], then u is integrable and ∣∫u dλ∣≤ε.

[F7]
[F8]

Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral: sums and differences of measurable real-valued functions are measurable.

[F9]

The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space and Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length: relative closed intervals and singletons in [0,1] are Borel; each half-open cell [a,b) is [a,b]∖{b} and hence is Borel.

[F10]

Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable: under Countable Choice, every Borel subset of R is Lebesgue measurable. A relative Borel subset of the closed interval [0,1] is Borel in R, so the same inclusion holds on [0,1].

[A1]

g is continuous on [0,1].

[A2]

Countable Choice is assumed for the Lebesgue interval-measure formula [F4] and Borel-to-Lebesgue inclusion [F10]; the finite-partition comparison below uses no further choice principle.

Proof

1.1A1A2F1F4F6F7F10

By [F1], g is bounded and Riemann integrable. Its Borel preimages from [F7] are Lebesgue measurable by [F10] under [A2], so g is Lebesgue measurable. Boundedness together with λ([0,1])=1 from [F4] and [F6] makes g Lebesgue integrable.

1.2A1F2F7F8F9choose

Fix ε>0. By [F2] choose δ>0 such that ∣g(x)−g(y)∣<ε whenever x,y∈[0,1] and ∣x−y∣<δ. Choose an integer N≥1 with 1/N<δ and let Ik=[k/N,(k+1)/N) for k<N−1 and IN−1=[(N−1)/N,1]. These are Borel cells by [F9], and their finite-valued function ϕN(x)=g(k/N) on Ik is a Borel simple function. Thus g−ϕN is Borel measurable by [F8], and ∣g(x)−ϕN(x)∣<ε on each cell.

2.1A2step 1.2F4F5algebra

The cells in step 1.2 form a measurable partition and have measure 1/N by [F4] under [A2]. Therefore [F5] gives ∫ϕN dλ=SN, where SN=N−1∑k=0N−1g(k/N) is the left tagged sum for the same uniform partition.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F3F4F5F6

The measurable difference in step 1.2 is bounded by ε, so [F6] gives ∣∫g dλ−SN∣=∣∫(g−ϕN) dλ∣≤ε. For each closed partition cell [k/N,(k+1)/N], its infimum is at most the left endpoint value g(k/N) and its supremum is at least that value. Multiplying these termwise inequalities by 1/N and summing places the left tagged sum SN between the lower and upper Darboux sums. Each cell has oscillation at most ε, so their total difference is at most ε∑k1/N=ε. By [F3], the Riemann integral lies between the same Darboux sums, hence ∣∫01g(x) dx−SN∣≤ε.

4.1A2F4F10step 3.1algebra∎

The triangle inequality applied to step 3.1 yields ∣∫g dλ−∫01g(x) dx∣≤2ε. Since ε>0 was arbitrary, the two real integrals are equal. The construction chooses only one finite partition for each ε; its choice-axiom uses are precisely [F4] and [F10] under [A2].

Remarks

The proof uses explicit uniform partitions and avoids the stronger general Riemann-to-Lebesgue equality theorem. Its dependency on Countable Choice is stated: the interval-measure formula comes from A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Lebesgue measure on the unit interval supplies Gaussian moment data

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For every integer M≥1, Lebesgue measure on the relative Borel space [0,1] is Gaussian quadrature moment data of order 2M in the sense of Positive-measure Gaussian quadrature moment data.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer M≥1 and Lebesgue measure λ on [0,1].

[F1]

A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included: λ([0,1])=1, and every nonempty relative interval neighborhood in [0,1] has positive measure equal to its length.

[F2]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals and Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: if g is Borel measurable and 0≤g≤1 on [0,1], then g is integrable and 0≤∫g dλ≤1 because λ([0,1])=1.

[F3]

Positive-measure Gaussian quadrature moment data: order-2M data require a finite positive measure whose relative support contains at least M+1 points and whose absolute moments through degree 2M are finite.

[F4]

Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function and The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space: polynomial and absolute-value functions are continuous on [0,1]. Continuity makes preimages of open subsets of R relatively open in [0,1], so preimages of Borel sets belong to the relative Borel sigma-algebra generated by those opens.

[A1]

Countable Choice, required by [F1] for the Lebesgue interval-measure theorem.

Proof

1.1A1F1F3construct

The measure is finite and positive because [F1] under [A1] gives λ([0,1])=1. Every x∈[0,1] belongs to the relative support: any relative open neighborhood of x contains a relative interval of positive length, including when x=0 or x=1, so its measure is positive by [F1]. Thus the support contains the M+1 distinct points 0,1/M,2/M,…,1, as required in [F3].

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

For each integer 0≤k≤2M, [F4] makes x↦∣x∣k continuous and Borel measurable on [0,1], and it satisfies 0≤∣x∣k≤1 there (with ∣x∣0=1). Thus [F2] applies and its integral is at most one. These finite moments and step 1.1 verify every condition in [F3], proving the assertion.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes

Definition

Let M,d≥1, let 0≤c1<⋯<cM≤1 be distinct collocation nodes, and let ℓ1,…,ℓM be their cardinal polynomials from Cardinal-polynomial interpolation. Define Qij:=∫0ciℓj(s) ds,bj:=∫01ℓj(s) ds. The matrix Q∈RM×M and vector b∈RM are the collocation tableau coefficients. For an IVP y′=f(t,y) with f:D→Rd on the open time-state domain D of First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, fix (t,u)∈D and a step h>0. A stage vector U∈(Rd)M is admissible only when (t+cjh,Uj)∈D for every j. On this admissible set write Fj(U):=f(t+cjh,Uj),QF(U):=(∑j=1MQijFj(U))i=1M. All displayed integrals use the oriented Riemann convention of The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf. In particular Qij=0 when ci=0, and the integral in uh vanishes at τ=0. The collocation stages and endpoint are the implicit Runge–Kutta equations of Implicit Runge–Kutta stage equations and update with A=Q, nodes c, and weights b: U=1u+hQF(U),Ψh(t,u)=u+h∑j=1MbjFj(U). The associated collocation polynomial on normalized time τ∈[0,1] is uh(τ):=u+h∫0τ∑j=1Mℓj(s)Fj(U) ds. Thus uh(ci)=Ui, uh′(ci)=hFi(U), and uh(1)=Ψh(t,u) whenever U is an admissible solution. This definition alone asserts no branch existence or uniqueness.

For interpolation estimates define the Lebesgue constant of this fixed node set by ΛM:=max⁡0≤s≤1∑j=1M∣ℓj(s)∣. For a real matrix A, write ∥A∥∞:=max⁡i∑j∣aij∣. These constants depend on the nodes and on M; no uniform-in-M bound is part of the definition.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Collocation quadrature data are well defined

Statement

For the distinct nodes and cardinal polynomials in Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes, every entry of Q, every component of b, and the Lebesgue constant ΛM is a finite real number.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer M≥1 and distinct nodes 0≤c1<⋯<cM≤1 as in Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes.

[F1]

Cardinal-polynomial interpolation and Cardinal interpolation functions are polynomials of the stated degrees: each cardinal function ℓj is a polynomial of degree at most M−1.

[F3]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous real function on a nondegenerate compact interval is Riemann integrable. For a degenerate interval, The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf stipulates that the integral is zero.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3construct

By [F1], each ℓj is a polynomial, hence continuous by [F2]. For every i,j, its restriction to [0,ci] is Riemann integrable by [F3] when ci>0, and its integral is 0 when ci=0. Its integral on [0,1] is also finite by [F3]. Thus all defining entries Qij and bj are finite.

2.1F2F4algebra∎

The function s↦∑j=1M∣ℓj(s)∣ is continuous by [F2]; [F4] supplies its finite maximum on [0,1]. This is exactly ΛM from the definition. The matrices Q and the vector b have finitely many finite entries, so their displayed finite sums and row norms are finite as well.

AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep

Definition

Let D⊆R×Rd be the open time-state domain of an IVP y′=f(t,y), with d≥1. The inputs are a time t∈R, an initial state u∈Rd with (t,u)∈D, a step h>0, an integer M≥1, distinct ordered nodes 0≤c1<⋯<cM≤1, a predictor (default U0=1u), a Lipschitz bound L≥0, a tolerance tol>0, an integer sweep budget K≥0, a supplied stage set C, and a caller-supplied Boolean flag invariance_certified. A stage vector U is admissible only when (t+cjh,Uj)∈D for every j.

After validating the node data, form the collocation tableau Q,b of Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes. Let c0=0, Δcj=cj−cj−1, and define the left-Euler node-subinterval preconditioner by its initial column ai=c1 and stage block (QΔ)ij={Δcj+1,j<i,0,j≥i. The stage block is strictly lower triangular. In augmented notation, set Q^=(0∣Q), Q^Δ=(a∣QΔ), and F^(U)=(f(t,u),F(U)). One sweep is Uk+1=1u+hQ^ΔF^(Uk+1)+h(Q^−Q^Δ)F^(Uk). The fixed initial-column contributions cancel, so the procedure below does not evaluate F0=f(t,u). For a stage vector U, write Fj(U)=f(t+cjh,Uj). Since QΔ is strictly lower triangular, for fixed previous stages Uk the unique new stages are computed in increasing i by the forward recursion Uik+1=u+h∑j<i(QΔ)ijFj(Uk+1)+h∑j=1M(Qij−(QΔ)ij)Fj(Uk),i=1,…,M.

Use ∥V∥∞,2=max⁡i∥Vi∥2 and ∥A∥∞=max⁡i∑j∣Aij∣. The supplied set C must be a nonempty closed product ball of admissible stage vectors and have an L-Lipschitz stage field F(U)=(Fj(U))j=1M in this norm. A flag value true is admissible only with the caller-established guarantee that, for every V,Z∈C, 1u+hQΔF(Z)+h(Q−QΔ)F(V)∈C. This is the inner-map invariance assertion; with a<1 it also ensures outer-sweep invariance. A flag value false makes no invariance assertion. Establishing the guarantee is external to this procedure; the procedure reads the supplied flag and does not decide a universally quantified property of f. After forming QΔ, compute a=hL∥QΔ∥∞. If a≥1, return contraction-not-certified with no accepted endpoint. For a<1, compute q=hL∥Q−QΔ∥∞/(1−a); if q≥1 or invariance_certified is false, return contraction-not-certified with no accepted endpoint. The exact procedure is:

  1. Reject repeated, unordered, or out-of-range nodes as invalid-node-data before forming the tableau.
  2. Form Q,b,QΔ from the valid nodes and apply the contraction inequalities and the supplied Boolean flag test described above.
  3. If the predictor is outside C or any required stage evaluation (t+cjh,Uj) lies outside D, return inadmissible-stage and no accepted endpoint.
  4. Evaluate and store all M values Fj(U0) once.
  5. If K=0, return iteration-budget-exhausted and no accepted endpoint; no residual test has been performed.
  6. For k=0,1,…,K−1, compute Uk+1 in increasing stage order using the displayed recursion, reusing the stored F(Uk) and evaluating each new Fj(Uk+1) once. If a new stage is outside D, return inadmissible-stage and no accepted endpoint. Then compute rk=∥Uk+1−Uk∥∞,2. If rk≤(1−q) tol, return status residual-tolerance-met, the stage vector Uk, and endpoint u+h∑j=1MbjFj(Uk). If this is the Kth sweep and the test failed, return iteration-budget-exhausted and no accepted endpoint; otherwise use Uk+1 and its stored field values as the next iterate.

These statuses report only the stated branch outcome; they do not assert convergence when a check fails.

Form Q,b,QΔ once per invocation and retain their coefficients through the sweep loop. Retain the old and current stage vectors and their field values while computing a sweep and testing its residual. On continuation, reuse these buffers for the next sweep; on acceptance, use the retained Uk and F(Uk) for the returned stage vector and endpoint in step 6. Perform the displayed operations in exact real arithmetic.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Stage-call, storage and arithmetic bounds for a finite SDC execution

Statement

Consider the procedure of Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep with M,d≥1 and budget K≥0. Count one stage call for each instructed evaluation of Fj(U)=f(t+cjh,Uj), even when different calls happen to have equal arguments. Generating the supplied predictor and constructing or checking external admissibility, set-membership or invariance certificates are outside this call count. Assume each invoked evaluation and check returns. The following counts apply to any supplied predictor, including the default constant predictor.

  • An exit at the node, contraction, invariance or predictor-admissibility checks before step 4 uses zero instructed stage calls. A run completing step 4 uses M predictor calls. If K=0, it then returns iteration-budget-exhausted, with no residual test and no accepted endpoint.
  • If predictor evaluation and exactly s full sweeps complete, with no incomplete sweep, the run uses exactly M(s+1) stage calls, where 0≤s≤K. If the next sweep instead exits at an inadmissible stage after evaluating a prefix of p new stages, where 0≤p<M and s<K, the count is exactly M(s+1)+p.
  • Hence every execution uses at most M(K+1) instructed stage calls. Equality holds for a run completing predictor evaluation and all K sweeps, including the K=0 case after predictor evaluation. Acceptance after s≥1 completed sweeps returns Us−1; forming its endpoint uses the cached F(Us−1) and adds no stage call. No F0=f(t,u) call is required.

For direct dense evaluation of the prescribed finite sums, the stored tableau and preconditioner use O(M2) real coefficients, and old/current stage and derivative buffers use O(Md) real scalars. A complete sweep uses O(M2d) scalar arithmetic in addition to its M stage calls. Its residual requires O(Md) scalar arithmetic, at most M square roots and O(M) comparisons; the accepted endpoint requires O(Md) further arithmetic and no stage calls. These bounds also bound any evaluated prefix of a failed sweep. After the quadrature data are supplied, forming the preconditioner, coefficient differences and contraction row norms uses O(M2) scalar arithmetic and absolute-value operations. Including default constant-predictor initialization, all direct algebraic work through any exit is bounded by O(M2+(K+1)M2d), with at most KM square roots for residuals; scalar absolute values and loop/comparison work obey the same asymptotic bound. The storage bound is independent of K when buffers are reused as instructed.

These bounds exclude the work and internal storage of evaluating f, constructing the polynomial quadrature data, generating a supplied nondefault predictor, and performing the external domain/set/certificate checks. They do not bound those unspecified tasks or assert that a failed execution completed K sweeps. All counts concern exact real arithmetic and give no floating-point roundoff guarantee.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite SDC procedure, its positive integers M,d, integer budget K≥0, and the counting model in the Statement.

[F1]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: steps 1–3 validate before predictor evaluation; step 4 evaluates and stores all M predictor derivatives once; step 5 handles K=0 after those evaluations.

[F2]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: step 6 runs at most K sweeps in increasing stage order, reuses old derivatives, checks a new stage before evaluating it, and evaluates each new stage derivative once. Its residual test after computing Uk+1 returns Uk and the endpoint using F(Uk) on acceptance; otherwise it continues with the new buffers or returns budget exhaustion. The fixed initial column cancels before the stage recursion.

[F3]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: Q,QΔ are M by M, b has M components, stages and derivatives have M blocks of d real coordinates, and the forward recursion consists of sums over j<i and 1≤j≤M. Setup coefficients are retained and old/current buffers are reused after the residual test.

[A1]

Scalar additions, subtractions, multiplications and divisions are counted as scalar arithmetic; square roots, absolute values and comparisons are counted separately as stated. Dense sums are evaluated by accumulating their terms, with no retained history of previous sweeps. The unspecified tasks excluded in the Statement are not charged to this algebraic work bound.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

By [F1], preliminary exits precede any instructed stage call. A run reaching and completing step 4 executes exactly one call for each of the M stage indices. Step 5 is after this operation, so K=0 gives exactly M calls and the stated exhausted status, without a residual test or accepted endpoint. The cancellation in [F2] removes both appearances of the fixed initial derivative from the forward recursion, so no separate F0 call is instructed, including when a collocation node equals zero.

1.2F3A1algebra

There are 2M2 entries in Q,QΔ, M weights and O(M) node data; optionally storing Q−QΔ adds M2 entries. Thus coefficient storage is O(M2). The two stage vectors and two derivative vectors have 4Md scalar entries, and accumulators and the endpoint require at most O(Md) further entries. Buffer reuse in [F3] keeps this storage independent of K. Once Q,b are available, computing the node differences, QΔ, Q−QΔ and the maximum absolute row sums visits at most O(M2) entries, giving the asserted setup work, outside the excluded checks.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

In a full sweep, [F2] reuses every old derivative and executes exactly one new derivative call for each stage, for M new calls. Summing these disjoint calls over s full sweeps and adding step 1.1 gives M+sM=M(s+1). If the next stage is inadmissible after p new derivative evaluations, it is rejected before its own evaluation and no remaining stage is evaluated; the count is consequently M(s+1)+p, with p<M. Here s<K, so M(s+1)+p<M(K+1); without an incomplete sweep, s≤K gives M(s+1)≤M(K+1). Exits before step 4 also satisfy this bound by step 1.1. Equality holds when all K sweeps complete. After s full sweeps, the current loop index is k=s−1; on acceptance [F2] returns Us−1 and its endpoint is a weighted sum of derivatives already in the old buffer. Thus endpoint formation makes no additional stage call and does not substitute Us for the returned stage vector.

3.1F1F2F3A1step 1.2algebra∎

At stage i, the two sums in [F3] contain at most (i−1)+M≤2M terms, each a scalar multiple of a d-vector. Direct scalar multiplication and accumulation cost O(Md) arithmetic for that stage, hence O(M2d) for at most M stages. Early exit evaluates only a prefix of these sums. Each completed residual computes Md differences and squares, M sums of d squares, at most M square roots, and a maximum over M norms; this costs O(Md) arithmetic and the stated additional operations. An accepted endpoint sums M weighted d-vectors for O(Md) arithmetic. There are at most K attempted sweeps, at most K residual tests and at most one accepted endpoint. Default predictor initialization takes O(Md) scalar assignments. Adding this initialization, step 1.2 setup and the per-sweep work gives O(M2+(K+1)M2d) because M,d≥1; at most KM square roots are used. The same bounds hold through any earlier exit. No work or storage from an excluded task has been charged, and exact-real counts provide no assertion about floating-point error.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Fixed points of the SDC sweep are collocation stages

Statement

For an admissible stage vector U, the fixed-point equation for one sweep of Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep holds if and only if U=1u+hQF(U), the collocation stage equation of Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The nodes and collocation data, the vector field, and an admissible stage vector U in the stated stage domain.

[F1]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: the collocation stage equation is U=1u+hQF(U).

[F2]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: the sweep is defined by U+=1u+hQ^ΔF^(U+)+h(Q^−Q^Δ)F^(U), with Q^=(0∣Q) and F^(U)=(f(t,u),F(U)).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

If U is a fixed point of the sweep, set U+=U in [F2]. The two preconditioner matrices add to Q^, so U=1u+hQ^F^(U)=1u+hQF(U) because the first column of Q^ is zero. This is [F1].

2.1givenF1F2algebra∎

Conversely, if U=1u+hQF(U), then the right-hand side of [F2] with U+=U is 1u+h(Q^Δ+Q^−Q^Δ)F^(U)=1u+hQF(U)=U. Thus U is a fixed point.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

One-node Gauss data are midpoint data

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the Lebesgue interval-measure formula. For Lebesgue measure on [0,1], the one-node Gaussian quadrature rule has node c1=1/2 and weight b1=1. Its one-stage collocation tableau therefore has Q11=1/2 and endpoint weight b1=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Lebesgue measure on [0,1] and the one-node Gaussian quadrature rule from The m-node Gaussian quadrature rule for a positive measure.

[F1]

Lebesgue measure on the unit interval supplies Gaussian moment data: Lebesgue measure on [0,1] is valid one-node moment data through degree two, and its support has at least two points.

[F2]

Positive-measure Gaussian quadrature moment data: the order-two datum also meets the order-one branch used by the rule definition, because its measure, support, and moments through degree one satisfy that branch's conditions.

[F3]

Monic orthogonal polynomials exist uniquely through the quadrature order: for these data, the monic degree-one polynomial orthogonal to constants is unique.

[F4]

The m-node Gaussian quadrature rule for a positive measure and The Gaussian nodes, cardinal polynomials and weights are well-defined: the Gaussian node is the root of that polynomial and its weight is the integral of the one-node cardinal polynomial; the root and weight are defined.

[F5]

Cardinal-polynomial interpolation: the cardinal polynomial for one node is ℓ1(x)=1.

[F7]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: the one-stage collocation coefficient is Q11=∫0c1ℓ1(s) ds and the endpoint weight is b1=∫01ℓ1(s) ds.

[A1]

Countable Choice, through the Lebesgue interval-measure theorem used by [F1].

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F6algebraconstruct

By [F6], ∫01x dλ=∫01x dx=1/2 and ∫011 dλ=1. Thus p1(x)=x−1/2 is monic and satisfies ∫p1 dλ=0, the orthogonality condition against every degree-zero polynomial. The data are admissible by [A1, F1]–[F2], so uniqueness in [F3] identifies it with the one-node orthogonal polynomial.

2.1F4F5F7step 1.1algebra∎

The only root of p1 is 1/2, so [F4] gives c1=1/2. By [F5] its cardinal polynomial is 1, whose integral on [0,1] is 1 by step 1.1; hence b1=1. The tableau formula [F7] gives Q11=∫01/21 ds=1/2.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

SDC iteration matrix for the scalar linear test equation

Statement

For the scalar test equation y′=λy and z=hλ, let U∗ be a collocation stage vector and Uk the SDC iterates using the explicit-left-Euler stage block QΔ from Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep. Then Ek+1=B(z)Ek,B(z):=(I−zQΔ)−1z(Q−QΔ),Ek:=Uk−U∗. The inverse exists for every real z because QΔ is strictly lower triangular. In the induced infinity norm from Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes, ∥Ek∥∞,2≤∥B(z)∥∞k∥E0∥∞,2. This identity makes no convergence claim when the powers of B(z) do not tend to zero; stability of the fully solved collocation step alone is not an SDC iteration guarantee.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed node set, its collocation matrices Q,QΔ, a scalar λ∈R, step h>0, and the scalar ODE y′=λy.

[F1]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: the stage update is Uk+1=1u+hQΔF(Uk+1)+h(Q−QΔ)F(Uk).

[F2]

Fixed points of the SDC sweep are collocation stages: the SDC fixed point is the collocation stage vector.

[F3]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep makes QΔ strictly lower triangular; Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes defines ∥A∥∞=max⁡i∑j∣aij∣.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

On this equation, F(U)=λU. Subtract the fixed-point instance of [F1] from its kth sweep to obtain (I−zQΔ)Ek+1=z(Q−QΔ)Ek. The diagonal of I−zQΔ consists of ones and it is lower triangular by [F3], so forward substitution uniquely solves this system for every z∈R.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra∎

Solving step 1.1 gives Ek+1=B(z)Ek with the displayed B(z); induction yields Ek=B(z)kE0. For any vector v, the row-wise triangle inequality gives ∥B(z)v∥∞,2≤∥B(z)∥∞∥v∥∞,2, so applying this bound k times gives the stated power estimate. No bound less than one is asserted for general z or node sets.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Contraction and residual error bound for the SDC sweep

Statement

Let C be a nonempty closed product ball of admissible stage vectors in (Rd)M, with metric ∥U−V∥∞,2=max⁡i∥Ui−Vi∥2. For each V∈C, assume the inner stage map Z⟼1u+hQΔF(Z)+h(Q−QΔ)F(V) maps C into itself, and assume the stage field F(U)=(f(t+cih,Ui))i=1M is L-Lipschitz there for some L≥0. Put a=hL∥QΔ∥∞,q=hL∥Q−QΔ∥∞1−a. If a<1 and q<1, then every sweep is uniquely defined in C, the sweep map S:Uk↦Uk+1 is a contraction with constant q, and its unique fixed point U∗ is the unique collocation stage vector in C. For every V∈C, ∥V−U∗∥∞,2≤∥S(V)−V∥∞,21−q. If the initial iterate satisfies U0∈C, then the iterates Uk+1=S(Uk) obey ∥Uk−U∗∥∞,2≤qk∥U0−U∗∥∞,2. In particular, a residual-certified predictor used with Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep must lie in C. These are local stage-iteration claims; they assert no convergence when either contraction inequality fails.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The SDC sweep, its lower-triangular stage preconditioner QΔ, a nonempty closed product ball C, and the self-map and Lipschitz hypotheses in the Statement. The geometric iterate estimate additionally has the stated premise U0∈C.

[F1]

R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R: every Cauchy sequence in a finite-dimensional Euclidean space converges in that space.

[F3]

A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point: a contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has a unique fixed point and its iterates converge to that point.

[F4]

Fixed points of the SDC sweep are collocation stages: a fixed point of the SDC sweep is exactly a solution of the collocation stage equations.

[F5]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: ∥Q∥∞=max⁡i∑j∣Qij∣, and the row-sum norm satisfies ∥AV∥∞,2≤∥A∥∞∥V∥∞,2 for block vectors.

[F6]

Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric: a metric is symmetric, separates distinct points, and satisfies the triangle inequality.

[F7]

Cauchy sequence in a metric space: a sequence is Cauchy when its pairwise distances tend to zero uniformly beyond a sufficiently large index.

[F8]

Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space: a metric space is complete when every Cauchy sequence converges to a point in it.

[A1]

For each V∈C, the inner stage map Z↦1u+hQΔF(Z)+h(Q−QΔ)F(V) maps C into itself; F is L-Lipschitz in ∥⋅∥∞,2 on C; and a<1, q<1. For the geometric iterate estimate, U0∈C.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F6F7F8construct

The block distance d(U,V)=max⁡i∥Ui−Vi∥2 has the metric properties [F6]: symmetry and separation hold coordinatewise, and [F2] gives d(U,W)≤d(U,V)+d(V,W). If (Un) is d-Cauchy in the sense of [F7], then each of its finitely many Euclidean coordinates is Cauchy; [F1] gives coordinate limits. Since C is a closed product ball, the coordinatewise limit belongs to C, so [F8] makes (C,d) complete.

2.1A1F3F5step 1.1algebra

For a fixed previous iterate V∈C, the new-stage equation is Z=1u+hQΔF(Z)+h(Q−QΔ)F(V). Its right-hand side maps C into itself by [A1]; the norm inequality in [F5] and the Lipschitz bound in [A1] show that its difference at Z,W∈C is at most a∥Z−W∥∞,2. Since a<1, [F3] gives a unique Z=S(V) in C.

3.1A1F5step 2.1algebra

Let V,W∈C, and write Z=S(V), Z′=S(W). Subtracting their stage equations cancels the fixed initial derivative and yields ∥Z−Z′∥∞,2≤hL∥QΔ∥∞∥Z−Z′∥∞,2+hL∥Q−QΔ∥∞∥V−W∥∞,2. Rearranging by 1−a>0 gives ∥S(V)−S(W)∥∞,2≤q∥V−W∥∞,2, so S is a contraction of C.

4.1A1F3F4step 1.1step 3.1induction

By [F3] and step 1.1, S has a unique fixed point U∗∈C. Fact [F4] identifies it with the unique collocation stage vector in this ball. Under the iterate premise U0∈C in [A1], repeated application of the contraction inequality in step 3.1 gives ∥Uk−U∗∥∞,2≤qk∥U0−U∗∥∞,2.

5.1A1step 3.1step 4.1F2algebra∎

For any V∈C, S(U∗)=U∗ and the triangle inequality give ∥V−U∗∥∞,2≤∥V−S(V)∥∞,2+∥S(V)−S(U∗)∥∞,2≤∥V−S(V)∥∞,2+q∥V−U∗∥∞,2. Since 1−q>0, rearranging proves the residual estimate.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Collocation polynomial derivatives scale with the step size

Statement

Fix M distinct nodes in [0,1], a time t, and an exact IVP solution y on an interval [t,t+h0] for some h0>0, with initial state u=y(t). Let D⊆R×Rd be open and let f:D→Rd be defined on a neighborhood of a compact tube containing this exact trajectory and the collocation stages. Assume each scalar coordinate of f has continuous partial derivatives through total order 2M+1, all bounded on the tube. Smoothness of vector-valued functions and their derivative bounds here and below are componentwise; the scalar Taylor supplier is applied to each coordinate, and finite-dimensional coordinate bounds give the stated Euclidean norm bounds. Assume the collocation stage branch exists and is locally unique in this tube for all sufficiently small h≤h0. Let uh be the collocation polynomial from Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes, and set gh(τ)=f(t+hτ,uh(τ)),rh(τ)=uh′(τ)−hgh(τ). For 1≤j≤M, ∥uh(j)∥∞≤Cjhj; for j>M, uh(j)=0. For 0≤j≤2M, ∥gh(j)∥∞≤Cjhj (with h0=1), and ∥rh(j)∥∞≤Cjhj+1. The constants depend on the fixed node set and its cardinal-basis derivative bounds; no uniformity in M is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The collocation tableau and polynomial, a small-step branch in the stated compact tube, and a vector field with the stated bounded smoothness.

[F1]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: uh(0)=u, uh′(τ)=hIMgh(τ), and uh(ci)=Ui, where IM is interpolation at the M fixed nodes.

[F2]

Cardinal interpolation functions are polynomials of the stated degrees supplies the finite cardinal sum IMv=∑jv(cj)ℓj, its degree bound M−1, and the nodal values; Existence and uniqueness of the cardinal-polynomial interpolant, with n=M−1, makes it the unique polynomial of degree at most M−1 with those data.

[F3]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment and Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives: scalar Taylor expansion with bounded remainder applies to each coordinate, and repeated differentiation of finite compositions obeys the chain and product rules on the common tube.

[F4]

Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: for scalar functions on time and normalized-time intervals, Ck means derivatives through order k exist and are continuous; this applies to coordinates of the paths and composites used below. Smoothness of f itself is the componentwise partial-derivative assumption in the Statement.

[F5]

First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: the exact path satisfies y′=f(t,y) on its interval.

[A1]

The nodes and tube are fixed as h↓0; the exact path, all stages, and the collocation polynomial stay in the tube, and the small-step branch of [F2] is used.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F5chooseinductionalgebra

For each real component polynomial p of degree at most M−1, p and IMp have the same M nodal data and degree bound, so uniqueness in [F2] gives IMp=p; all reproduction uses below are componentwise. The stage equations in [F1] and boundedness of f on the tube first give Ui−u=O(h). Since D is open and the finitely many partial derivatives used in [F3] are continuous at (t,u), choose a convex open ball about (t,u) contained in D and shrink it so those derivatives are bounded there. For sufficiently small h, every stage point (t+cjh,Uj) and its segment to (t,u) lie in this ball, so [F3] applies with uniform Taylor remainders. The exact path satisfies y′=f(t,y) by [F5]. We prove by induction on s=1,…,M that there are vector polynomials Ps of degree at most s such that Ui=u+∑r=1shrPr(ci)+O(hs+1) uniformly over the finite node set. For the induction step, substitute the expansion through order s into each scalar coordinate of f(t+hcj,Uj) and apply the scalar Taylor supplier [F3] at (t,u). Each coefficient of hm is a polynomial in cj of degree at most m, because every time increment contributes one factor cjh and each state coefficient at order r has degree at most r. For m≤M−1, [F2] makes interpolation exact on that coefficient; the row identity Qij=∫0ciℓj then integrates it to a polynomial in ci of degree at most m+1. Multiplication by the outer h gives the next Pm+1. Taylor remainders are uniform on the chosen ball for sufficiently small h, and the stated local branch supplies the stage solution.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

The coefficient construction in step 1.1 and its Taylor expansion give vector polynomials Rm of degree at most m with f(t+hcj,Uj)=∑m=0M−1hmRm(cj)+δj(h), where max⁡j∥δj(h)∥=O(hM). Apply componentwise reproduction from [F2] and define eh(τ)=∑jℓj(τ)δj(h). Then IMgh(τ)=∑m=0M−1hmRm(τ)+eh(τ) and every derivative of eh through order M−1 is O(hM), because its basis is fixed. Substituting into the defining integral in [F1], rather than identifying a degree-M polynomial from only its M stage values, gives uh(τ)=u+∑s=1MhsPs(τ)+Rh(τ) with Ps(τ)=∫0τRs−1(a) da and Rh(τ)=h∫0τeh(a) da. These are the same integrated coefficients used in step 1.1 through the row integrals Qij. Thus deg⁡Ps≤s, Ps(0)=0, ∥Rh∥∞=O(hM+1), and for 1≤j≤M, Rh(j)=heh(j−1)=O(hM+1). Differentiating the expansion annihilates every term with s<j and bounds the remaining terms by O(hj). Hence ∥uh(j)∥∞=O(hj) for 1≤j≤M; derivatives above M vanish by the defining integrated cardinal sum. This argument also covers M=1 and a node at zero.

3.1A1F3F4step 2.1algebra

Repeated chain and product rules from [F3] express each coordinate of gh(j) as a finite sum of derivatives of that coordinate of f applied to derivatives of (t+hτ,uh(τ)) whose orders add to j. Each argument derivative of order s≤M is O(hs) by step 2.1; higher derivatives vanish for the polynomial state and affine time coordinate. The bounded derivatives in [F4] therefore give ∥gh(j)∥∞≤Cjhj through j=2M.

4.1F2F3step 3.1algebra∎

For j<M, subtract from each coordinate of gh its Taylor polynomial of degree M−1 at 0. Its remainder and its first j derivatives are O(hM) by step 3.1 and the one-variable Taylor remainder in [F3]. Interpolation reproduces that Taylor polynomial by [F2]; derivatives of the interpolated remainder are bounded by the fixed constants max⁡τ∑i∣ℓi(j)(τ)∣, so (IMgh−gh)(j)=O(hM) coordinatewise. Multiplying by h gives rh(j)=O(hM+1)≤O(hj+1) for j<M and h≤1. For M≤j≤2M, IMgh has degree at most M−1, so its jth derivative vanishes and rh(j)=−hgh(j)=O(hj+1) by step 3.1.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

M-node collocation has local defect order M

Statement

Let M≥1, let 0≤c1<⋯<cM≤1 be fixed distinct nodes, and fix an exact IVP solution y on an interval containing [t,t+h0] for some h0>0, with initial state u=y(t). Let D⊆R×Rd be open with f:D→Rd an IVP vector field on a neighborhood of a fixed compact convex tube. Assume each scalar coordinate of f has continuous partial derivatives through total order M, bounded on the tube, and is L-Lipschitz in state there. Smoothness and derivative statements for vector-valued functions are componentwise; scalar Taylor is applied to each coordinate. Assume the exact path, stages, collocation polynomial, and comparison segments stay in the tube. In particular, the composite gh(s)=f(t+hs,y(t+hs)) satisfies ∥gh(M)∥∞≤CFhM uniformly; the stated componentwise smoothness and bounded exact-path derivatives imply this bound. Assume directly that for every sufficiently small h>0 the collocation stage equation has a unique solution in the tube. Then its endpoint map has uniform exact-start local defect O(hM+1) as h↓0. The constant depends on the fixed nodes, including their Lebesgue constant ΛM; no uniform-in-M estimate is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An exact IVP solution on [t,t+h], its collocation nodes, the stated smoothness and tube assumptions, and the small-step collocation branch.

[F1]

First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: the exact path satisfies y′(s)=f(s,y(s)).

[F2]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: Qij=∫0ciℓj(s) ds, bj=∫01ℓj(s) ds, and the endpoint is u+h∑jbjFj(U).

[F3]

Collocation quadrature data are well defined: the node integrals, Q, b, and ΛM are finite.

[F4]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: scalar Taylor's formula on the compact convex tube gives a uniform remainder for each coordinate, controlled by the next bounded derivative.

[F6]

Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives and Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: the one-variable coordinate paths use the CM convention of the scalar smoothness definition, and repeated chain and product rules apply componentwise to gh; smoothness of f is the partial-derivative assumption in the Statement.

[F7]

Cardinal-polynomial interpolation and Cardinal interpolation functions are polynomials of the stated degrees give the cardinal sum IM, its degree bound M−1, and the nodal values IMgh(cj)=gh(cj); Existence and uniqueness of the cardinal-polynomial interpolant, with n=M−1, supplies uniqueness for these M nodal data.

[A1]

The exact trajectory, exact stage values, collocation stages and the segments used in the Lipschitz estimates lie in the common tube; the constants are uniform as h↓0.

[A2]

The composite gh has the uniform derivative bound in the Statement. This follows by repeated chain and product rules: every normalized-time derivative contributes a factor h, while derivatives of f and the exact path are bounded on the fixed tube.

Proof

1.1A2F2F3F4F6F7algebra

Put gh(s)=f(t+hs,y(t+hs)). The exact path derivatives used here are bounded on the compact tube: y′=f(t,y) is bounded there, and differentiating this identity successively expresses each higher derivative of each scalar coordinate of y as a finite sum of products of bounded partial derivatives of f and already bounded lower derivatives of y. This induction gives bounded derivatives through order M under the stated componentwise CM hypothesis. Repeated chain rules [F6] then show coordinatewise ∥gh(M)∥∞≤ChM: every differentiation in normalized time contributes one factor h. Let pM−1 be the degree-(M−1) Taylor polynomial of each coordinate of gh at 0. By [A2] and scalar Taylor's remainder [F4], ∥gh−pM−1∥∞≤ChM. For each real component polynomial p of degree at most M−1, p and IMp have that degree bound and the same M nodal data, so uniqueness in [F7] gives IMp=p. Thus interpolation reproduces pM−1 componentwise by [F7]. The cardinal formula and [F3] give ∥IMv∥∞≤ΛM∥v∥∞ coordinatewise, hence ∥gh−IMgh∥∞≤(1+ΛM)ChM.

2.1F1F2F5F7step 1.1algebra

Let Yi=y(t+cih) be the exact stage values and u=y(t). Coordinatewise FTC and the interpolation values in [F7] give their collocation residual ri=Yi−u−h∑jQijf(t+cjh,Yj)=h∫0ci(gh(s)−IMgh(s)) ds. Step 1.1 yields ∥r∥∞,2≤CMhM+1, where CM includes 1+ΛM.

3.1A1F2F3step 2.1algebra

The fixed matrix Q is finite by [F3], so for fixed L and sufficiently small h, hL∥Q∥∞≤1/2. Subtract the exact-stage residual equation from the collocation equation for the unique branch U∗ assumed in the Statement; the row-sum norm and state Lipschitz bound give ∥Y−U∗∥∞,2≤∥r∥∞,2+hL∥Q∥∞∥Y−U∗∥∞,2. Thus ∥Y−U∗∥∞,2≤CMhM+1/(1−hL∥Q∥∞).

4.1A1A2F2F5F7step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

Applying the scalar FTC to each coordinate gives y(t+h)=u+h∫01gh(s) ds by [F5]. Also ∫01IMgh(s) ds=∑jbjgh(cj) by [F2] and [F7]. Add and subtract this interpolant integral and the endpoint evaluated at exact stages to obtain y(t+h)−Ψh(u)=h∫01(gh−IMgh)(s) ds+h∑jbj(f(t+cjh,Yj)−f(t+cjh,Uj∗)). The first term is O(hM+1) by step 1.1. The second is bounded by hL(∑j∣bj∣)∥Y−U∗∥∞,2=O(hM+2) by step 3.1, so the local defect is O(hM+1).

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable

Statement

Let f be L-Lipschitz in state on a common invariant stage tube, and let the collocation stage branches for initial states u,v lie in that tube. If hL∥Q∥∞≤1/2, then ∥U(u)−U(v)∥∞,2≤2∥u−v∥2. Consequently the collocation step map Ψh(u)=u+h∑jbjf(t+cjh,Uj(u)) satisfies ∥Ψh(u)−Ψh(v)∥2≤(1+2hL∥b∥1)∥u−v∥2,∥b∥1:=∑j∣bj∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A collocation tableau, two admissible initial states and their selected collocation stages in one common tube, a state Lipschitz constant L, and hL∥Q∥∞≤1/2.

[F1]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: U(u)=1u+hQF(U(u)) and Ψh(u)=u+h∑jbjFj(U(u)).

[F3]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes defines ∥Q∥∞=max⁡i∑j∣Qij∣; Collocation quadrature data are well defined proves its entries are finite.

[A1]

Both assumed stage branches exist in the same set where the state-Lipschitz bound in the Statement applies, and all stage values are admissible.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3algebra

Subtract the stage equations in [F1] for u and v. The branches are the ones assumed in the Statement; the block triangle inequality [F2], state Lipschitz bound [A1], and row-sum definition [F3] give ∥U(u)−U(v)∥∞,2≤∥u−v∥2+hL∥Q∥∞∥U(u)−U(v)∥∞,2. Since hL∥Q∥∞≤1/2, moving the last term to the left yields the stated factor 2.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Subtract the endpoint formulas in [F1]. By [F2] and the same state Lipschitz bound, ∥Ψh(u)−Ψh(v)∥2≤∥u−v∥2+hL∑j∣bj∣∥Uj(u)−Uj(v)∥2. Apply step 1.1 and the definition of ∥b∥1 to obtain the asserted one-step bound.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A Gaussian collocation defect has a high-order weighted endpoint bound

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the Lebesgue interval-measure formula. Fix M≥1, the M-node Gauss rule for Lebesgue measure on [0,1], a time t, and an exact IVP solution y on an interval containing [t,t+h0] for some h0>0, with initial state u=y(t). Let D⊆R×Rd be open, let f:D→Rd be an IVP vector field on a neighborhood of a common compact convex tube, let uh be its Gauss collocation polynomial for this exact start, and put gh(s)=f(t+hs,uh(s)). Assume each scalar coordinate of f has continuous partial derivatives through total order 2M+1, all bounded on the tube; vector smoothness and derivatives below are understood componentwise, with scalar Taylor and quadrature results applied coordinatewise. The tube contains the exact path, uh, and every segment joining them, and the collocation branch and tube are uniform for sufficiently small h≤h0. Use the induced Euclidean operator norm ∥A∥op:=sup⁡∥v∥2=1∥Av∥2, and assume ∥Dyf∥op≤L on the tube. Then its endpoint defect satisfies ∥y(t+h)−uh(1)∥2≤Ch2M+1, where C may depend on the fixed nodes and on M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The IVP and exact path, its M-node Gauss collocation polynomial, the common convex tube, and the uniform smoothness hypotheses in the Statement.

[F1]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: uh(0)=y(t), uh′(s)=hIMgh(s), and uh(1) is the collocation endpoint.

[F2]

Collocation polynomial derivatives scale with the step size: gh(j)=O(hj) for 0≤j≤2M, and the collocation defect rh=uh′−hgh satisfies rh=O(hM+1).

[F3]

Gaussian quadrature is exact through degree 2m−1 and has positive weights and Gaussian quadrature has the Hermite mean-value remainder: the Gauss rule is exact through degree 2M−1; for each C2M scalar coordinate function v its quadrature error is bounded by ∥v(2M)∥∞∫01pM(s)2ds/(2M)!.

[F4]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment: the scalar Taylor supplier applies to each coordinate or matrix entry, with remainders bounded by the corresponding uniform derivative bound.

[F5]

Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives: derivatives of finite products and compositions satisfy the chain and Leibniz rules.

[F7]

The uniform limit of continuous real-valued functions on a metric space is continuous: a uniform limit of continuous real functions is continuous, entrywise for finite-dimensional matrix functions.

[F9]

R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R: every Cauchy sequence in the finite-dimensional matrix space, identified with a Euclidean space of entries, converges there.

[F10]

Cardinal-polynomial interpolation and Cardinal interpolation functions are polynomials of the stated degrees: IMgh is the cardinal polynomial sum of degree at most M−1 and matches gh at every Gauss node.

[F11]

The m-node Gaussian quadrature rule for a positive measure and Lebesgue measure on the unit interval supplies Gaussian moment data: the Gauss weights are wj=∫ℓj dλ for valid order-2M Lebesgue moment data on [0,1]; that same measure also meets the lower order-2M−1 moment branch because its moments through degree 2M−1 are finite.

[F12]

Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree for continuous data on [0,1]: continuous node polynomials have equal Riemann and Lebesgue integrals on [0,1].

[F13]

First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: the exact path satisfies y′=f(t,y).

[F14]

Monic orthogonal polynomials exist uniquely through the quadrature order: the monic degree-M orthogonal polynomial is uniquely determined by the same moments in either moment-data branch.

[F15]

Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: the one-variable coordinate paths and composites use the scalar Ck convention; the multivariable smoothness of each component of f is the partial-derivative assumption in the Statement.

[A2]

Countable Choice, through the Lebesgue interval-measure formula needed to identify the Gauss measure and its moments.

[A1]

All partial derivatives of f through order 2M+1 are bounded on the compact tube. The induced Euclidean operator norm is submultiplicative by its definition.

Proof

1.1givenA1A2F1F2F8F13algebra

Let yh(s)=y(t+hs) and e(s)=yh(s)−uh(s). Define the averaged Jacobian A(s)=∫01Dyf(t+hs,uh(s)+θe(s)) dθ and B(s)=hA(s). For each unit vector v∈Rd, the vector integral inequality [F8] gives ∥A(s)v∥2≤∫01∥Dyf(t+hs,uh(s)+θe(s))v∥2 dθ≤L. Taking the supremum over unit v proves ∥A(s)∥op≤L and hence ∥B(s)∥op≤hL. Applying the scalar FTC to each coordinate along the segment gives f(t+hs,yh(s))−f(t+hs,uh(s))=A(s)e(s). With rh=uh′−hgh, [F13] and [F1] give e′=Be−rh, e(0)=0.

2.1A1F6F7F8F9step 1.1inductionconstructalgebra

For a continuous matrix function X set ∥X∥∞:=sup⁡s∈[0,1]∥X(s)∥op. Define (TX)(s)=∫s1X(τ)B(τ) dτ entrywise. For any unit vector v, the vector integral inequality [F8] and submultiplicativity in [A1] give ∥(TX−TY)(s)v∥2≤∫s1∥(X−Y)(τ)B(τ)v∥2 dτ≤hL∥X−Y∥∞. Taking the supremum over unit v and s proves ∥TX−TY∥∞≤hL∥X−Y∥∞. For hL≤1/2, T is a contraction. Starting with P0=I, set Pn+1=I+TPn. Successive differences are bounded by 2−n∥TP0∥∞, so their entries are uniformly Cauchy; [F9] gives an entrywise limit and the geometric tail bound makes convergence uniform. Each iterate is continuous and [F7] makes the limit P continuous. Passing to the limit in Pn+1=I+TPn gives P=I+TP, hence P′=−PB and P(1)=I by applying [F6] to each matrix entry. If P and P~ both solve it, D=P−P~=TD implies ∥D∥∞≤12∥D∥∞, so D=0; also P=I+TP gives ∥P∥∞≤2.

2.2A1F5F13F15step 1.1inductionalgebra

The normalized exact path satisfies yh′=hf(t+hs,yh(s))=O(h) by [F13] and [A1]. If yh(r)=O(hr) for 1≤r≤j, the chain rule [F5] writes the jth derivative of f(t+hs,yh(s)) as a finite sum whose argument-derivative orders total j; each term is O(hj). Differentiating the IVP identity gives yh(j+1)=O(hj+1). Induction proves yh(j)=O(hj) through order 2M.

3.1A1F2F5F15step 2.2algebra

The path uh+θ(yh−uh) between the collocation polynomial and exact path has normalized derivatives of order j≤M−1 of size O(hj) by [F2] and step 2.2. Repeated chain and product rules for Dyf, then integration over 0≤θ≤1 with uniform remainders on the compact tube, give ∥A(j)∥∞=O(hj) and ∥B(j)∥∞=O(hj+1) for 0≤j<M.

4.1F4F5step 2.1step 3.1inductionalgebra

Differentiating P′=−PB entrywise gives P(j)=−∑k=0j−1(j−1k)P(k)B(j−1−k) for 1≤j≤M. Induction from ∥P∥∞≤2 and step 3.1 yields ∥P(j)∥∞≤Cjhj. Apply the scalar Taylor formula [F4] to every matrix entry to get a matrix polynomial q of degree at most M−1 with ∥P−q∥∞≤ChM and ∥q(j)∥∞≤Cjhj for j<M. Finite dimensionality combines the entrywise bounds in the induced operator norm.

5.1A2F1F2F3F10F11F12F14step 4.1algebra

By [F1], bj=∫01ℓj(s) ds; by [F11] the Gauss weights are wj=∫ℓj dλ. The continuous-integral agreement [F12] gives bj=wj. Uniqueness of the monic orthogonal polynomial [F14] makes the order-2M and order-(2M−1) branch nodes identical, so [F3] applies to this tableau. By [F2], ∥gh−IMgh∥∞=O(hM). The cardinal interpolation [F10] gives degree at most 2M−2 for each coordinate of qIMgh, and [F3] therefore gives, coordinatewise, ∫qIMgh=∑jbjq(cj)gh(cj). Split the weighted defect integral entrywise as ∫01P(gh−IMgh)=∫01(P−q)(gh−IMgh)+(∫01qgh−∫01qIMgh).

6.1F2F3F5step 4.1step 5.1algebra

The first integral in step 5.1 is O(h2M) by step 4.1 and ∥gh−IMgh∥∞=O(hM). For each scalar coordinate, the parenthesized term is the Gauss quadrature error for that coordinate of qgh. Leibniz' rule [F5] and the bounds q(j)=O(hj) and gh(j)=O(hj) show (qgh)(2M)=O(h2M) coordinatewise, so the scalar remainder [F3] bounds every coordinate error by O(h2M). Since there are finitely many coordinates, the vector integral is O(h2M) in Euclidean norm. Hence ∫01P(gh−IMgh)=O(h2M).

7.1F1F2F5F6step 1.1step 2.1step 6.1algebra∎

By step 1.1, e′=Be−rh, and step 2.1 gives P′=−PB, P(1)=I. Apply the product rule entrywise to obtain (Pe)′=−Prh; the scalar FTC on each coordinate and e(0)=0 give e(1)=−∫01Prh=h∫01P(gh−IMgh). Step 6.1 bounds this by O(h2M+1), and [F1] identifies uh(1) as the collocation endpoint. This proves the local defect bound.

PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

One-node Gauss collocation is implicit midpoint of order two

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the Lebesgue interval-measure formula. Let D⊆R×Rd be open and let f:D→Rd be an IVP vector field on a neighborhood of a common compact convex tube; consider an exact solution y of y′=f(t,y) on a fixed interval [0,T] in this tube. Assume each scalar coordinate has continuous partial derivatives through total order two and is Lipschitz in y there. Smoothness and Taylor expansions for vector-valued functions are interpreted componentwise, by applying scalar results to each coordinate. Assume the small-step one-stage collocation branch exists uniquely in this tube and its stages, the exact path, and the segments used in the estimates remain there. For the one-node Gaussian tableau of One-node Gauss data are midpoint data, the method is the implicit midpoint rule and, starting from the exact initial value, has global order two on any fixed interval for which these hypotheses hold uniformly.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An exact IVP solution on [0,T], a common tube, the one-node Gaussian data, and the local branch assumptions in the Statement.

[F1]

One-node Gauss data are midpoint data: c1=1/2, b1=1, and Q11=1/2.

[F2]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: the one-stage equations are U=u+hQ11f(t+c1h,U) and Psih(u)=u+hb1f(t+c1h,U).

[F3]

Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment and Chain sum product and composition rules for Banach derivatives: scalar Taylor expansion to second order has a uniform quadratic remainder on the tube and applies to each coordinate; differentiating each coordinate of y′=f(t,y) gives y′′=ft+Dyf f componentwise.

[F4]

Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C∞: the one-variable coordinate paths use the scalar C2 convention; multivariable smoothness of the components of f is the partial-derivative assumption in the Statement.

[F5]

Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable: if hL∥Q∥∞≤1/2, then the one-stage map has Lipschitz constant at most 1+2hL∣b1∣.

[F6]

Global error from uniform one-step defect and stability requires all numerical grid states and stages in its common tube. We establish that containment below, using Finite geometric error bound from a one-step recurrence: an error recurrence en+1≤(1+L0h)en+Ch3 with e0=0 gives a uniform bound en≤CTh2 on every mesh prefix of length at most T.

[F7]

First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals: the exact path satisfies y′=f(t,y) on the stated interval.

[F9]

Small-step implicit Runge–Kutta stages have a unique branch and controlled residual error: a bounded Lipschitz stage field on a closed product ball has a unique stage when h∥Q∥∞B≤R and h∥Q∥∞L<1.

[A1]

The exact path and stage values remain in the common tube, the unique local branch in the Statement is selected, and the segments used in the Lipschitz and Taylor estimates are contained there; all constants are uniform in the starting grid time.

[A2]

Countable Choice, as required by the one-node Lebesgue moment data in [F1].

Proof

1.1A1A2F1F2F3F4algebra

Substituting [F1] under [A2] into [F2] gives U=u+(h/2)f(t+h/2,U) and Ψh(u)=u+hf(t+h/2,U), which is precisely implicit midpoint. Since f is bounded on the compact tube, the stage equation gives U−u=O(h). Taylor expansion of each coordinate at (t,u) then gives U−u=(h/2)f(t,u)+O(h2): first use U−u=O(h) in f(t+h/2,U)=f(t,u)+O(h) and substitute that estimate back into the stage equation.

2.1A1F2F3F7step 1.1algebra

Write f0=f(t,u). Applying the first-order scalar Taylor formula with quadratic remainder [F3] to each coordinate at (t+h/2,U) and using step 1.1 yields f(t+h/2,U)=f0+h2(ft(t,u)+Dyf(t,u)f0)+O(h2) in Euclidean norm. The exact path has y′(t)=f0 by [F7] and y′′(t)=ft(t,u)+Dyf(t,u)f0 by [F3]. Coordinatewise Taylor's formula for y and the endpoint expression in step 1.1 therefore give y(t+h)−Ψh(u)=O(h3) uniformly.

3.1A1F1F3F5F8F9step 1.1step 2.1choosealgebra

Let K be the compact convex time-state tube in the Statement, and let V be its open neighborhood where f is componentwise C2. By [F8] choose r>0 such that the closed 4r-neighborhood K+ lies in V⊆D. This neighborhood is compact and convex, and [F8] gives uniform bounds B+ for f, L+ for Dyf, and bounds for the second partial derivatives there. If ∥u−y(tn)∥2≤r and h≤2r, every stage point (tn+h/2,Y) with ∥Y−u∥2≤r is within 3r of (tn,y(tn))∈K, hence lies in K+. For hB+/2≤r and hL+/2≤1/2, [F9] supplies the unique midpoint stage in that ball. Any other midpoint stage in K+ equals it by subtracting the equations and using hL+/2<1; thus it agrees with the branch assumed in the Statement whenever that branch lies in K. The Taylor estimates of steps 1.1–2.1 and stability [F5] apply uniformly on K+, with endpoint Lipschitz bound 1+2L+h.

4.1F6step 2.1step 3.1chooseinductionalgebra∎

Set y0=y(0) and compute on h=T/N. As long as en:=∥yn−y(tn)∥2≤r, step 3.1 defines the next stage and endpoint. Inserting the exact-start endpoint and using steps 2.1 and 3.1 gives en+1≤(1+2L+h)en+Ch3. On every such mesh prefix [F6] bounds all errors, including the newly computed endpoint error, by CTh2, with CT independent of the prefix length because that length is at most T. Choose h small enough that CTh2<r. Starting with e0=0, induction now continues every step and keeps every grid state within r of the exact path. All grid states and stages therefore lie in K+, and the same recurrence gives max⁡0≤n≤Nen≤CTh2. This proves global order two without assuming endpoint containment in the original tube.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

M-node collocation has global order M

Statement

Let M≥1 and suppose the hypotheses of M-node collocation has local defect order M and Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable hold uniformly on a fixed interval [0,T]. Starting with the exact initial value and using the collocation endpoint map on a uniform mesh, the maximum grid error is O(hM) as h=T/N↓0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact IVP solution, a uniform mesh, the M-node collocation endpoint map, and uniform tube and branch hypotheses.

[F1]

M-node collocation has local defect order M: the exact-start one-step defect is uniformly O(hM+1).

[F2]

Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable: for sufficiently small h, the one-step map is Lipschitz with a bound 1+L0h for a fixed L0.

[F3]

Global error from uniform one-step defect and stability: on a fixed interval, exact initial data, local defect O(hp+1) and a (1+L0h) stability bound imply global error O(hp).

[A1]

The exact solution, numerical grid states, stages and comparison segments stay in the common compact tube for every mesh step.

Proof

1.1A1F1F3

By [F1], take a mesh-independent constant C with ∥Ψh,n(y(tn))−y(tn+1)∥2≤ChM+1 for every step. This is the local-defect hypothesis of [F3] with p=M.

2.1A1F2F3step 1.1∎

By [F2] the same endpoint maps satisfy the fiberwise stability bound required in [F3]; the initial error is zero by hypothesis. Applying [F3] with p=M proves max⁡n∥yn−y(tn)∥2=O(hM).

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Each SDC sweep raises the order up to the collocation order

Statement

Fix M≥1 collocation nodes and a nonnegative integer k independent of h. Use the explicit-left-Euler SDC sweep in Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep with constant predictor U0=1u and form the candidate endpoint from Uk, after k completed sweeps. Assume each coordinate of f has continuous partial derivatives through total order M on an open neighborhood of a common compact tube T; assume f is state-Lipschitz with constant L and bounded by B on T, which contains the exact path, all iterates, and the comparison segments. Also assume the exact-path integrand has the derivative bound required by M-node collocation has local defect order M. At each mesh time tn, let Un⊆Ttn:={u:(tn,u)∈T} be a set of starting states containing the exact and numerical grid states used in the global-error comparison. For every u∈Un, assume the constant predictor U0=1u belongs to a nonempty closed product ball Cn,u used in Contraction and residual error bound for the SDC sweep, and each inner stage map and sweep preserves Cn,u. Assume the contraction theorem holds uniformly with a=hL∥QΔ∥∞≤1/2 and q≤Cqh<1. For the global-order assertion, initialize the numerical grid solution exactly, y0=y(0). For fixed k, the Uk endpoint map has exact-start defect O(hp+1) and global order p=min⁡(M,k+1) on any fixed interval, provided all grid states stay in T. The claim is local-step and fixed-k; it asserts no uniform constants as M or k grows.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed uniform mesh, an IVP, its collocation stages and endpoint, the constant SDC predictor, and the uniform tube and contraction hypotheses.

[F1]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: U∗=1u+hQF(U∗) and the collocation endpoint is u+h∑jbjFj(U∗).

[F2]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: each iterate satisfies Uj+1=1u+hQΔF(Uj+1)+h(Q−QΔ)F(Uj), and its candidate endpoint is u+h∑jbjFj(Uk).

[F3]

Contraction and residual error bound for the SDC sweep: there is a unique collocation stage vector U∗∈C; when U0∈C, the iterates converge to it and ∥Uk−U∗∥∞,2≤qk∥U0−U∗∥∞,2.

[F4]

M-node collocation has local defect order M: the exact-start collocation defect is uniformly O(hM+1).

[F5]

Finite geometric error bound from a one-step recurrence: if e0=0 and en+1≤(1+Csh)en+Chp+1 uniformly, then the maximum grid error is O(hp) on a fixed interval.

[A1]

The numerical grid solution starts at y0=y(0). The field satisfies ∥F(U)∥∞,2≤B and ∥F(U)−F(V)∥∞,2≤L∥U−V∥∞,2 on the common invariant tube. The fixed nodes make Q,QΔ,b finite and independent of h.

Proof

1.1A1F1F3algebra

The stage points of the contraction limit U∗ lie in the compact set T, since all iterates do and they converge by [F3]. The constant predictor gives ∥U0−U∗∥∞,2=∥hQF(U∗)∥∞,2≤h∥Q∥∞B by [F1] and the row-sum norm. Since q≤Cqh, [F3] gives ∥Uk−U∗∥∞,2≤Cqk∥Q∥∞Bhk+1 for fixed k (with the same O(h) bound when k=0).

1.2A1F2algebrainduction

To bound dependence on the input, let Dj=∥Uj(u)−Uj(v)∥∞,2 for two starts u,v∈Un, and put δ=hL∥Q−QΔ∥∞. Subtracting the stage equations [F2] and using the row-sum norm gives (1−a)Dj+1≤∥u−v∥2+δDj. Since a≤1/2 and δ=O(h), D0=∥u−v∥2 and induction for the fixed number k gives Dk≤Ck∥u−v∥2 with Ck independent of h.

1.3givenconstruct

Let Ω be the open neighborhood of T on which the stated smoothness holds, within the IVP domain. There is ρ>0 such that the closed 3ρ-neighborhood N of T lies in Ω: cover T by finitely many balls whose concentric doubled balls lie in Ω, and take 3ρ smaller than the minimum of their radii. The set N is compact, so all partial derivatives through order M are bounded there. In particular, since M≥1, the state Jacobian has a uniform bound L^; applying the scalar mean-value estimate along state segments gives a state Lipschitz bound L^ on each convex cylinder contained in N. For an exact start u=y(t), the fixed cylinder Kt=[t,t+ρ]×B‾(u,ρ) is compact, convex, and contained in N, because its points have distance at most 2ρ from (t,u)∈T. These bounds are uniform in t and independent of h.

2.1givenA1F1F3F4step 1.1step 1.3algebra

For an exact start, [F1] and step 1.1 give sup⁡0≤τ≤1∥uh(τ)−u∥2≤hΛMB. The exact path has speed at most B, hence sup⁡0≤τ≤1∥y(t+τh)−u∥2≤hB. Thus for h≤ρ and hBmax⁡{1,ΛM}≤ρ, both paths, the stages, and their comparison segments lie in Kt. Any two collocation solutions V,W with stage points in Kt satisfy ∥V−W∥∞,2≤hL^∥Q∥∞∥V−W∥∞,2 by subtracting [F1]. Taking hL^∥Q∥∞<1 proves uniqueness there; existence follows from [F3] and the containment of U∗. Together with the assumed exact-path derivative bound, step 1.3 now verifies every tube, smoothness, and branch hypothesis of [F4], with uniform constants.

2.2A1F2step 1.2algebra

Applying the endpoint formula [F2] to the two stage vectors gives ∥Ψh(k)(u)−Ψh(k)(v)∥2≤∥u−v∥2+hL∥b∥1Dk≤(1+Csh)∥u−v∥2 for u,v∈Un.

3.1A1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The endpoint formula in [F2], the state Lipschitz bound, and step 1.1 give a difference from the exact collocation endpoint of at most hL∥b∥1∥Uk−U∗∥∞,2=O(hk+2). Adding the exact collocation defect [F4], whose hypotheses were checked in step 2.1, gives an exact-start defect O(hM+1)+O(hk+2)=O(hp+1), since p+1=min⁡(M+1,k+2) and h≤1.

4.1A1F4F5step 3.1step 2.2algebra∎

Let en=∥yn−y(tn)∥2. Both starts lie in Un by the Statement. Insert and subtract the exact-start one-step output to obtain, using step 2.2 and step 3.1, en+1≤(1+Csh)en+Chp+1 with p=min⁡(M,k+1) and a uniform C. The initial error is e0=0, so [F5] gives global order p.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A stage residual tolerance preserves collocation order

Statement

Fix M nodes and an integer 1≤p≤M. On a fixed interval use exact collocation stages Un∗ and the collocation endpoint map Ψh,n of Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes. Assume the hypotheses of Contraction and residual error bound for the SDC sweep hold uniformly, with contraction constants qn≤q0<1, the common field Lipschitz constant is L, and all exact and approximate stages and grid states stay in one compact tube. Assume also that the hypotheses of M-node collocation has local defect order M and Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable hold uniformly at all mesh times for the exact and numerical starting states, including the bounded componentwise smoothness, exact-path derivative bound, and common branch and tube requirements. Let Un∗ be the collocation stage vector for the numerical start yn, and suppose the SDC stage vector Vn belongs to its invariant product ball Cn and satisfies ∥Sn(Vn)−Vn∥∞,2≤(1−qn)Cτhp+1. Starting from the exact initial value and setting yn+1=yn+h∑jbjf(tn+cjh,(Vn)j), the inexact method has global error O(hp). Thus a fixed residual constant and a stage target O(hp+1) preserve any collocation order p≤M; the bound is conditional on the stated local contraction and tube assumptions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A uniform mesh h=T/N, the exact IVP solution, the collocation tableau and branch, and the uniform local-defect and stability hypotheses, and the inexact stage vectors satisfying the Statement.

[F1]

Contraction and residual error bound for the SDC sweep: for every stage vector V in the invariant product ball Cn, ∥V−Un∗∥∞,2≤∥Sn(V)−V∥∞,2/(1−qn); this estimate does not require V to be an iterate.

[F2]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes: the exact collocation endpoint is Ψh,n(u)=u+h∑jbjf(tn+cjh,Uj∗(u)).

[F3]

Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable: exact collocation endpoints from two inputs in the tube differ by at most (1+Lsh) times the input difference, for a uniform Ls.

[F4]

M-node collocation has local defect order M: the exact-start collocation defect is bounded by C0hM+1 uniformly. For h≤1 and p≤M, this is also at most C0hp+1.

[L1]

Finite geometric error bound from a one-step recurrence: if en+1≤(1+Lsh)en+Chp+1 and e0=0, then max⁡nen≤C′hp on the fixed interval.

[A1]

For every n, Vn and Un∗ lie in the corresponding invariant product ball Cn; the segments joining corresponding stages lie in the tube, so the state Lipschitz estimate applies componentwise.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

Applying [F1] to the residual inequality in the Statement gives ∥Vn−Un∗∥∞,2≤Cτhp+1. By [F2], the same-input endpoint difference is ∥yn+h∑jbjf(tn+cjh,(Vn)j)−Ψh,n(yn)∥2≤hL∑j∣bj∣∥Vn−Un∗∥∞,2≤LCτ∥b∥1hp+2, where ∥b∥1=∑j∣bj∣ is finite because the tableau has finitely many finite entries.

2.1A1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Let en=∥yn−y(tn)∥2. Insert and subtract the exact collocation output from yn and the exact-start collocation output. By the triangle inequality, [F3] and [F4], en+1≤(1+Lsh)en+C0hp+1+LCτ∥b∥1hp+2≤(1+Lsh)en+C1hp+1, for h≤1, where C1=C0+LCτ∥b∥1 is independent of n,h.

3.1F1L1step 2.1∎

The initial error is zero. Apply [L1] to the recurrence in step 2.1 to obtain max⁡0≤n≤Nen≤C′hp. This proves the claimed order and makes no claim for a residual threshold that fails the stated O(hp+1) stage target.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

M-node Gauss collocation has local defect order 2M

Statement

Assume Countable Choice for the Lebesgue interval-measure formula. Let M≥1, fix a time t and an exact IVP solution y on an interval containing [t,t+h0] for some h0>0, and put u=y(t). Let D⊆R×Rd be open and let f:D→Rd be an IVP vector field on a neighborhood of a common compact convex tube along this exact path, its collocation branch, and connecting segments. Assume each scalar coordinate of f has continuous partial derivatives through total order 2M+1, bounded on the tube; vector smoothness and derivative estimates are componentwise, using scalar Taylor results coordinatewise. Use the M-node Gaussian rule for Lebesgue measure on [0,1], assume ∥Dyf∥op≤L there, and assume the stage branch is uniquely defined in the tube for all sufficiently small h≤h0. Then the exact-start local defect of the collocation endpoint is O(h2M+1) as h↓0. Its constant depends on the fixed nodes and M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Gaussian moment data, its quadrature rule, the matching collocation tableau, and the exact-start IVP and local branch in the Statement.

[F1]

Positive-measure Gaussian quadrature moment data and The m-node Gaussian quadrature rule for a positive measure: for Lebesgue measure on [0,1], the Gauss nodes and weights are defined from the monic orthogonal polynomial and cardinal integrals.

[F2]

Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree for continuous data on [0,1]: for continuous integrands on [0,1], the Lebesgue and Riemann integrals agree.

[F3]

A Gaussian collocation defect has a high-order weighted endpoint bound: under the stated smoothness, convex-tube and branch assumptions, the Gauss collocation endpoint defect is bounded by Ch2M+1.

[F4]

Collocation tableau from distinct quadrature nodes and Collocation quadrature data are well defined: the resulting collocation coefficients and endpoint map are finite and defined.

[F5]

Lebesgue measure on the unit interval supplies Gaussian moment data: for every M, Lebesgue measure on [0,1] satisfies the order-2M moment-data assumptions used in [F1].

[A1]

Countable Choice, as required by the Lebesgue moment-data verification in [F5].

[A2]

The selected stages and exact path remain in the common tube, including every segment used in the weighted-defect proof; the local branch hypotheses are uniform for sufficiently small h.

Proof

1.1A1F1F4F5construct

By [F5] under [A1] the chosen Gaussian rule has admissible Lebesgue moment data. Fact [F1] gives its nodes and cardinal-integral weights, and [F4] makes the matching collocation tableau finite and defined.

2.1A2F2F3step 1.1∎

The smoothness, common-tube, and branch hypotheses of [F3] are precisely those in the Statement and [A2]. The lemma therefore gives ∥y(t+h)−Ψh(y(t))∥2≤Ch2M+1, which is the claimed exact-start local defect estimate. Agreement of the integral conventions is [F2].

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

M-node Gauss collocation has global order 2M

Statement

Assume Countable Choice as required by M-node Gauss collocation has local defect order 2M. Let M≥1 and suppose the hypotheses of that theorem and Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable hold uniformly on a fixed interval [0,T]. Starting with the exact initial value and using the M-node Gauss collocation endpoint map on a uniform mesh, the maximum grid error is O(h2M) as h=T/N↓0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact IVP solution, a uniform mesh, the M-node Gauss collocation endpoint map, and the common-tube and branch hypotheses.

[F1]

M-node Gauss collocation has local defect order 2M: the exact-start defect is uniformly O(h2M+1).

[F2]

Small-step collocation maps are Lipschitz stable: for sufficiently small h, the endpoint map has a uniform Lipschitz bound 1+L0h.

[F3]

Global error from uniform one-step defect and stability: a uniform exact-start O(hp+1) defect and (1+L0h) stability on a fixed interval imply global error O(hp) from exact initial data.

[A1]

The exact solution, numerical grid states, stages and comparison segments remain in the common tube on every mesh step.

Proof

1.1A1F1F3

By [F1], for a constant independent of the mesh and step index, ∥Ψh,n(y(tn))−y(tn+1)∥2≤Ch2M+1. This is the local-defect hypothesis of [F3] with p=2M.

2.1A1F2F3step 1.1∎

By [F2] the stability premise of [F3] holds uniformly; the starting value is exact. Applying [F3] with p=2M gives max⁡n∥yn−y(tn)∥2=O(h2M).

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources