How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a commutative ring,
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let , let be the free -module on an -element set with standard basis (The free module on a set and its standard basis), and let be an -module. Write for the direct sum of copies of (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules), which for a finite index set is the coordinatewise product. Then
is an isomorphism of -modules, the source carrying the module structure of Over a commutative ring the homomorphism group is an -module.
At both sides are the zero module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a natural number , the free module with standard basis , and an -module .
Every set map extends uniquely to an -module homomorphism with , given by (Universal property of the free module on a set).
In the standard basis vector has coordinate at and zero elsewhere, and every element has a unique expression with finite; for the module is (The free module on a set and its standard basis).
For a family of left -modules the direct sum is the submodule of the coordinatewise product consisting of the families of finite support; for both product and direct sum are the zero module (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
For a commutative ring and -modules , the abelian group is an -module under , with the published addition unchanged (Over a commutative ring the homomorphism group is an -module).
Proof
is a bijection. It is injective: two homomorphisms agreeing on are the unique extension of the same set map on the index set, hence equal. It is surjective: given , the set map extends to a homomorphism with , so .
is -linear. Addition in and in is pointwise and coordinatewise respectively, so ; and the scalar action on the source is pointwise, so .
A bijective -module homomorphism is an isomorphism of -modules, so is one. At the index set is empty: , the only homomorphism is the zero map, and is the zero module, so both sides are zero and is the unique map between them.
Remarks
-
The isomorphism depends on the chosen basis. A different ordered basis of gives a different ; what is canonical is that is isomorphic to , not any particular isomorphism.
-
Finiteness of the index set is what makes the target a direct sum. For an infinite index set the same argument identifies with the coordinatewise product of copies of , not with the direct sum, because a homomorphism may be nonzero on infinitely many basis vectors.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)