How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Over a commutative ring the homomorphism group is an -module
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be -modules. Then the abelian group of The abelian group and maps induced by pre- and postcomposition becomes an -module under the pointwise scalar action
The underlying additive group is the published one, unchanged: this extends the abelian-group structure rather than replacing it. Commutativity of is used, and is used only to see that is again -linear.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and -modules .
For left -modules , the set of module homomorphisms is an abelian group under pointwise addition, with zero the zero homomorphism and inverse (The abelian group and maps induced by pre- and postcomposition).
A ring is commutative when its multiplication is commutative, for all (Commutative ring).
A left -module is an abelian group with an action satisfying , , and (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
A function between left -modules is an -module homomorphism if and for all and (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
Proof
The set already carries the pointwise addition making it an abelian group, with the zero homomorphism as neutral element and as inverse. Nothing below alters that addition.
For and the function defined by is again an -module homomorphism. Additivity is pointwise: . Homogeneity is where commutativity enters: for , .
The module axioms hold pointwise, each being an identity in evaluated at an arbitrary : , , and .
So with the addition of step 1.1 and the action of step 2.1 satisfies the definition of an -module, and its additive group is the published abelian group unchanged.
Remarks
-
Commutativity is not decoration here. Over a noncommutative the function need not be -linear, since the computation in step 2.1 turns on . That is why The abelian group and maps induced by pre- and postcomposition gives only an abelian group in general, and why the module structure is recorded separately rather than being read into the definition.
-
The induced maps are -linear for this structure. For and the maps and of The abelian group and maps induced by pre- and postcomposition satisfy and , both by evaluating at a point, so nothing about the published functoriality has to be revisited.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., §4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)