How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The localised Hom map is an isomorphism for finite free sources
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let be multiplicative, let be a finite free -module, and let be a left -module. Then the natural map
from There is a natural localisation map on Hom is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a multiplicative subset , a finite free -module with basis , and a left -module .
The natural map satisfies (There is a natural localisation map on Hom).
A basis means that every element of has a unique finite linear combination in the basis elements (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
A homomorphism from a finite free module is uniquely determined by its basis values, and every tuple of target values occurs as those basis values (For a commutative ring, ).
A localised fraction is zero exactly when one element of kills its numerator (A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator).
The group is an -module (Over a commutative ring the homomorphism group is an -module).
In , addition and scalar multiplication satisfy whenever in (Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset).
Proof
By [L2] and [L6], every element of is an -linear combination of , so two -linear maps that agree on all are equal.
If , then for each , so [L4] gives with . Let . Then for every , hence by [L3]. Since is an -module by [L5], [L4] applied there gives . Thus is injective.
Let be -linear. Write with and , set , and set . By [L3], there is a unique -linear map with for all .
For each basis vector, , so step 1.1 gives . Thus is surjective.
Steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove that is an isomorphism.
Depends on
- There is a natural localisation map on Hom
- For a commutative ring, $\operatorname{Hom}_R(R^n,N)\cong N^n$
- A localised module fraction is zero exactly when one denominator kills its numerator
- Over a commutative ring the homomorphism group $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,N)$ is an $R$-module
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
- Localisation of a module at a multiplicative subset
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Proposition 12.25 (standard reference, not scraped)