Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A quasi-isometry of hyperbolic three-space has a quasiconformal boundary map

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. On H3={(z,s):z∈C, s>0} use the metric s−2(∣dz∣2+ds2). Suppose f:H3→H3 is a quasi-isometry with constants λ≥1, ε≥0: λ−1d(x,y)−ε≤d(f(x),f(y))≤λd(x,y)+ε, and with coarsely dense image. Then it induces an ideal-boundary homeomorphism h:C^→C^. There is H=H(λ,ε)<∞ such that, after postcomposition by any Möbius transformation carrying h(∞) to ∞, its plane restriction satisfies max⁡∣a−z∣=r∣h(a)−h(z)∣≤Hmin⁡∣a−z∣=r∣h(a)−h(z)∣(z∈C, r>0). Here h in that inequality denotes the normalized map. If the boundary homeomorphism preserves orientation, it is analytically quasiconformal in sphere charts, with constant at most H. If it reverses orientation, postcomposition with complex conjugation is quasiconformal with that constant. If f is equivariant for a homomorphism between groups of hyperbolic isometries, its boundary map is equivariant for their boundary actions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, upper-half-space metric, quasi-isometry and its constants and coarse density.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is retained for the local Morse, boundary extension and planar Sobolev suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

In a geodesic δ-slim space, finite-interval (λ,ε)-quasi-geodesics are within Hausdorff distance M=92λ2(ε+3δ) of every specified endpoint geodesic. Morse stability with explicit parameter dependence

[F2]

A quasi-isometry of geodesic hyperbolic spaces induces a boundary homeomorphism, bounded-distance maps give the same map, and extensions commute with composition. In a proper geodesic hyperbolic space every sequence-boundary class has a ray representative and its topology is the quotient of uniform convergence on bounded ray intervals. Quasi isometries extend to boundary homeomorphisms, Hg toolkit proper ray compactness and sequence comparison

[F3]

The Levi–Civita symbols are Γijk=12gkℓ(∂igjℓ+∂jgiℓ−∂ℓgij). For a positively oriented compact regular geodesic triangular disk in a frameable surface neighbourhood, AC gives ∫TK dA=α+β+γ−π. Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection, Gauss-Bonnet for a geodesic triangle

[F4]

An orientation-preserving plane homeomorphism with a fixed all-circle ratio bound H is analytically H-quasiconformal. This local supplier proves Sobolev regularity by difference quotients and total differentiability by the independent general-homeomorphism interface; it does not invoke an unproved qualitative metric criterion. Uniform circular distortion gives planar quasiconformality by difference quotients

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

We first give the model geometry used below. Translations, complex rotations and positive dilations act by (z,s)↦(az+b,∣a∣s) and preserve the metric by substitution. Euclidean inversion in the unit sphere, followed by reflection in a vertical plane, is (z,s)↦(−z‾/(∣z∣2+s2),s/(∣z∣2+s2)) and extends z↦−1/z. Its Euclidean differential scales lengths by (∣z∣2+s2)−1, while its height scales by the same factor, so it also preserves the hyperbolic metric. These maps generate all Möbius transformations: a matrix with nonzero lower-left entry gives a translation, an inversion, a complex dilation and a translation by elementary fraction division; a zero lower-left entry gives an affine map. Thus every boundary Möbius transformation extends to an isometry. The Cayley map T(z,s)=(2Re⁡z,2Im⁡z,∣z∣2+s2−1)/(∣z∣2+(s+1)2) is a bijection onto the unit ball, with inverse z=2(u1+iu2)/Q, s=(1−∣u∣2)/Q, Q=u12+u22+(1−u3)2. It carries (0,1) to the origin and gives metric 4∣du∣2/(1−∣u∣2)2: its Euclidean length factor is 2/(∣z∣2+(s+1)2) and 1−∣T∣2=4s/(∣z∣2+(s+1)2). Radial integration in the ball, together with ∣(∣u∣)′∣≤∣u′∣ on every competing path, gives distance 2artanh⁡∣u∣ from the origin. Applying the affine normalization of a general basepoint yields cosh⁡d((z,s),(w,t))=∣z−w∣2+s2+t22st. Equality in that radial length argument characterizes the radial segment. Its inverse Cayley image shows that geodesics are the vertical lines and the Euclidean semicircles orthogonal to the boundary. In particular geodesics are unique, closed bounded hyperbolic balls are compact by the displayed formula, and the ideal endpoints of a complete geodesic are its distinct Euclidean boundary endpoints. A complete geodesic is uniquely determined by those endpoints. Consequently an isometry with identity boundary action preserves every complete geodesic and fixes the intersection of two distinct complete geodesics through each point; it is the identity. Thus the Möbius extension constructed above is unique.

2.1A1F3step 1.1algebra

Every geodesic triangle lies in a totally geodesic hyperbolic plane. To see this, send one vertex to the center of the ball by the isometries in step 1.1; the two other vertices and that center lie in a Euclidean plane through the center. Reflection in that plane is a ball isometry, and uniqueness of geodesics makes its fixed plane totally geodesic. In its upper-half-plane coordinates (x,y), the Christoffel formula [F3] gives Γxyx=Γyxx=−1/y, Γxxy=1/y, Γyyy=−1/y, and all other symbols zero. Thus for the global positive orthonormal frame e1=y∂x, e2=y∂y, one has ∇e1e1=e2, ∇e1e2=−e1, ∇e2e1=∇e2e2=0 and [e1,e2]=−e1. Consequently R(e1,e2)e2=−e1 and K=−1. A noncollinear finite triangle bounds a compact regular disk with three embedded geodesic edges and ordinary corners: its sides are the unique segments in the three geodesic half-planes, and distinct sides meet transversely at their vertices. The global frame supplies the neighbourhood required by [F3]. Gauss–Bonnet therefore gives its area A=π−(α+β+γ)<π, since all three interior angles are positive. The area density of the displayed metric is y−2dx dy. On this plane a radius-r hyperbolic disk has area 2π(cosh⁡r−1): in the disk metric the Euclidean radius is R=tanh⁡(r/2), and integrating 4ρ(1−ρ2)−2 dρ dθ gives 4πR2/(1−R2)=2π(cosh⁡r−1). Fix a point p on one side of a nondegenerate finite triangle, and let d0 be its distance to the union of the other sides. If r<d0, the half-disk of radius r on the interior side of the first edge is contained in the triangle. Indeed, a radial geodesic from p to a point of that half-disk stays in the interior edge half-plane and would otherwise first exit across one of the other two actual edges at distance less than d0. Its area is π(cosh⁡r−1), while the triangle has area less than π by [F3]. Hence r≤arcosh⁡2 for every r<d0, giving d0≤δ:=arcosh⁡2. Degenerate triangles are 0-slim. This proves uniform δ-slimness of H3 locally, without using an external hyperbolicity assertion.

3.1A1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By [F2] and step 2.1, f induces a homeomorphism of sequence boundaries. In this model that boundary is the ordinary ideal sphere. For precision, in the ball every geodesic ray from the origin is radial by step 1.1 and is parameterized as u(r)=tanh⁡(r/2)ω, ∣ω∣=1. Substitution in the distance formula gives the product limit (ω∣ω′)0=−log⁡(∣ω−ω′∣/2) for distinct unit vectors and infinity for equal ones. Thus its product topology is the ordinary sphere topology, and finite-distance asymptotic rays have the same endpoint. By properness and [F2], every sequence-boundary class has a ray representative, and the uniform-on-bounded-interval topology of the radial rays is the ordinary topology of their unit endpoints. Consequently [F2]'s extension is exactly the ideal-boundary homeomorphism, and xn→a ideally implies f(xn)→h(a) whenever (xn) runs to infinity along a geodesic ray.

4.1A1F1step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Put M=92λ2(ε+3δ). If ℓ is a complete source geodesic with endpoints a,b, then f(ℓ) lies within distance M of the target complete geodesic ℓ′ with endpoints h(a),h(b). Fix a point x=ℓ(0) and apply [F1] to f∘ℓ on [−n,n]. There is a point yn of the target endpoint segment within M+1/n of f(x). Properness from step 1.1 gives a convergent subsequence of these witnesses. By step 3.1, the segment endpoints tend ideally to h(a),h(b). The orthogonal-circle or vertical-line formulas from step 1.1 show that these segments converge on compact subsets to ℓ′: an orthogonal circle is determined continuously by its two endpoints and its Euclidean plane, with a vertical line the limit when one endpoint is infinite. Equivalently normalize the two limiting endpoints to 0,∞ and use their orthogonal-circle formulas there. The witness limit therefore belongs to ℓ′, proving the distance bound. The same argument applies to every fixed x∈ℓ.

5.1step 1.1step 4.1constructalgebra

For an ordered ideal triangle τ=(a,b,c) define cτ by applying the unique boundary Möbius transformation taking (0,1,∞) to (a,b,c) to c0=(1/2,3/2) in the real vertical plane; use its isometric extension from step 1.1. Existence and uniqueness follow explicitly from the fractional linear expression sending a,b,c to 0,1,∞. The center c0 is at distance r0=log⁡3 from each of its three complete sides: for the vertical lines the distance formula minimizes to arsinh⁡((1/2)/(3/2))=log⁡3, and for the semicircle with endpoints 0,1 the normal is the vertical line through 1/2, giving log⁡((3/2)/(1/2))=log⁡3. Thus every cτ has distance r0 from each side. By step 4.1 and the upper quasi-isometry bound, f(cτ) is within D=max⁡{1,λr0+ε+M} of each side of the target triangle hτ.

6.1step 1.1step 5.1algebra

There is C(D)<∞ such that every point within D of all three complete sides of an ideal triangle is within C(D) of its specified center. Normalize to (0,1,∞) by an isometry. For a point (w,s), the distances to the vertical sides over 0 and 1 are arsinh⁡(∣w∣/s) and arsinh⁡(∣w−1∣/s): minimize the distance formula over the target height. Hence 1≤∣w∣+∣w−1∣≤2ssinh⁡D and s≥(2sinh⁡D)−1. The remaining side is the semicircle with endpoints 0,1, whose height is at most 1/2. Along every path, change in log⁡s has absolute value at most path length, directly from the metric. Its distance bound therefore gives s≤eD/2. Also ∣w∣≤ssinh⁡D≤eDsinh⁡D/2. These inequalities place (w,s) in a fixed Euclidean compact subset of upper half-space. The distance formula in step 1.1 is continuous there, so its maximum distance to c0 is a finite number C(D). By normalization this number works for every ordered ideal triangle. Step 5.1 now gives d(f(cτ),chτ)≤C(D).

7.1step 1.1step 6.1algebra

Postcompose f by the isometry extending a Möbius transformation that sends h(∞) to ∞; its quasi-isometry constants do not change. The normalized boundary map restricts to a plane homeomorphism. For distinct finite z,a, the center of (z,a,∞) is c(z,a)=((z+a)/2,3∣a−z∣/2), by the affine isometry in step 1.1. If ∣a−z∣=∣b−z∣=r, these two source centers have equal height 3r/2 and horizontal separation at most r. Their distance is at most arcosh⁡(5/3)=log⁡3 by the distance formula. Step 6.1 and the quasi-isometry inequality give d(c(hz,ha),c(hz,hb))≤2C(D)+λlog⁡3+ε. Height logarithms differ by at most hyperbolic distance, so ∣log⁡∣h(a)−h(z)∣∣h(b)−h(z)∣∣≤2C(D)+λlog⁡3+ε. The compact source circle maps injectively to a compact curve missing h(z), so its maximum and positive minimum exist. Taking them in this inequality proves the claimed all-circle bound with H=exp⁡(2C(D)+λlog⁡3+ε). This establishes a bounded equal-radius distortion, not merely a Hölder bound.

8.1A1F2F4step 1.1step 3.1step 7.1algebra∎

If h preserves orientation, apply [F4] to the plane map in step 7.1 to obtain analytic H-quasiconformality. To cover the omitted source point as well, choose a different omitted point q and choose Möbius transformations S,T taking q,h(q) respectively to ∞, and replace f by T∘f∘S−1. The isometries in step 1.1 preserve the same quasi-isometry constants, so steps 4.1–7.1 and [F4] apply in this second plane chart with the same H. The two charts cover the sphere. If h reverses orientation, postcompose by complex conjugation; its upper-half-space extension is a reflection isometry, and its composition with h preserves orientation, so the same argument applies. Finally equivariance follows either by taking ideal limits along rays or by the composition property in [F2]; the exact equality fγ=θ(γ)f implies hγ=θ(γ)h.

Source and supplier reading

The complete local Morse supplier and the complete local quasi-isometry boundary-homeomorphism supplier were read, including their actual hypotheses and arguments. The local planar circular-distortion supplier used here proves its Sobolev step independently of the published circular-dilatation item's external qualitative Gehring citation. The proof above also supplies hyperbolic three-space slimness, ideal-triangle center control and the equal-circle comparison locally; none is inferred from a Hölder boundary estimate. Prasad's full cached 32-page text was read in the earlier boundary-rigidity task. This item supplies no cusp or peripheral-group theorem and does not by itself establish Mostow–Prasad rigidity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources